Yes, You're A Communist

[PoliticalChic]

Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.

But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.

How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."


In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:

"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales

Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.

It follows:



1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.

a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.

b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.



2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:

a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.

b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981

c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.




And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society



Read more- if you dare, Liberals.

Communists, Socialists, Liberals and Progressives........as much relation to each other as.......Fascists, Nazis, Tea Partiers, Birthers, and Trump followers.

OMG!

Yet another moron with an "is not, is noooootttttttt!" post!

Shocker.

Have you ever had a substantial thought of your own? Or are all your best ideas simply links to other people's words?

All the time.

That's the reason

a. you came to try to rebut them...

and

b. you found you couldn't.

There's nothing to rebut, you haven't made an argument.

Earlier, I thought you produced the most inept post.

You've managed to top it.

 

[Mac1958]

I'd like to see Cruz come out and run with this. Trump can't, since he's a RINO, obviously.

But Cruz could declare that he's against any government involvement not explicitly delineated in the Constitution. Let's shit-can the whole thing, from Medicare to all of the various departments. His slogan could be "Bring Back the Old West!"

Pick a veep who agrees, and run on a platform of "let's see who can survive on what's left".
.

 

[Dovahkiin]

Political chic, you believe all liberals are comminists. Joe Biden is without a doubt a liberal person. Is he a communist? I'm pretty sure all republicans support keeping social security and not completely removing Medicaid/Medicare, are they communists?

Are you denying this?

" The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’"
Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism."

What does that have to do with what I posted? Just admit you're wrong.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Political chic, you believe all liberals are comminists. Joe Biden is without a doubt a liberal person. Is he a communist? I'm pretty sure all republicans support keeping social security and not completely removing Medicaid/Medicare, are they communists?

Are you denying this?

" The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’"
Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism."

What does that have to do with what I posted? Just admit you're wrong.

"Political chic, you believe all liberals are comminists (sic). "


And I proved it with this:
" The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’"
Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism."


Interesting that you didn't deny it.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Communists, Socialists, Liberals and Progressives........as much relation to each other as.......Fascists, Nazis, Tea Partiers, Birthers, and Trump followers.

OMG!

Yet another moron with an "is not, is noooootttttttt!" post!

Shocker.

Have you ever had a substantial thought of your own? Or are all your best ideas simply links to other people's words?

All the time.

That's the reason

a. you came to try to rebut them...

and

b. you found you couldn't.

You said Joe Biden and Andrew Cuomo were Communists, but you couldn't provide an iota of evidence to support it.

Your wild accusations are humorous, to say the least.

Each and every day you prove to be a low-life, gutter-dwelling serial liar.

Today is no different.


"You said Joe Biden and Andrew Cuomo were Communists,..."

No such thing ever occurred.

You simply made that up.

You're pretty scummy.....

Let me walk your toddler level intellect through it.

1. Your opening statement:

There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism.


2. From there we can construct this:

a. Liberals are Communists

b. Joe Biden is a Liberal

c. Therefore, Joe Biden is a Communist

or

a. Progressives are Communists

b. Andrew Cuomo is a Progressive

c. Therefore, Andrew Cuomo is a Communist



So, still want to deny you called Joe Biden and Andrew Cuomo Communists?

Or, you could admit your opening statement was idiocy.

Take your pick.


And if you won't admit your opening statement was idiocy, prove that Joe Biden and Andrew Cuomo are Communists.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Political chic, you believe all liberals are comminists. Joe Biden is without a doubt a liberal person. Is he a communist? I'm pretty sure all republicans support keeping social security and not completely removing Medicaid/Medicare, are they communists?

Are you denying this?

" The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’"
Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism."

What does that have to do with what I posted? Just admit you're wrong.

"Political chic, you believe all liberals are comminists (sic). "


And I proved it with this:
" The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’"
Goldberg, "Liberal Fascism."


Interesting that you didn't deny it.

Does a person who is pro-choice want to control every aspect of a person's life?

 

[NYcarbineer]

PoliticalChic, the perfect example of that type of paranoid who was often described as seeing Communists under every bush.

 

[JakeStarkey]

composition fallacy begins with "commmunism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism" are all the same thing.

They are not, and PC does not get to redefine traditional terms.

At the end of the day, yes they are because the result is the same. Producers lose out to the non producers in an effort to create equality of outcome.

That is your silly opinion without evidence or stats at all.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Communists, Socialists, Liberals and Progressives........as much relation to each other as.......Fascists, Nazis, Tea Partiers, Birthers, and Trump followers.

OMG!

Yet another moron with an "is not, is noooootttttttt!" post!

Shocker.

Have you ever had a substantial thought of your own? Or are all your best ideas simply links to other people's words?

All the time.

That's the reason

a. you came to try to rebut them...

and

b. you found you couldn't.

You said Joe Biden and Andrew Cuomo were Communists, but you couldn't provide an iota of evidence to support it.

Your wild accusations are humorous, to say the least.

Each and every day you prove to be a low-life, gutter-dwelling serial liar.

Today is no different.


"You said Joe Biden and Andrew Cuomo were Communists,..."

No such thing ever occurred.

You simply made that up.

You're pretty scummy.....

Nice to see you've now admitted you were wrong to call all liberals Communists.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

So? The largest contiguous empire in the world was held by people by China, the Mongols, shouldn't we be fearing them also, I mean, at anytime they could go back to reconquering their old empire...

Speaking of which....

1. Obama releases all the terrorists in Gitmo
2. He pulls out of the 'empty' prison camp
3. His communist pals, the Castros, take it over....
4. ...and sell it to.....guess who. China.
5. Ending of the Monroe Doctrine: transforming the entire hemisphere.


Could be?

Get thee informed, Chica! The US has a perpetual lease on Gitmo, so your idiotic fantasy isn't going to take wing.

And if it happens....will you admit your are a communist dupe?

It won't happen you idiot! Get thee informed!

1. "President Obama Will Close Guantanamo Bay Prison: Aide"

President Obama Will Close Guantanamo Bay Prison: Aide

2. "Castro: Cuba not cashing US Guantanamo rent checks

The ailing Cuban leader, who has not appeared in public for more than a year, said he had refused to cash the checks to protest the "illegal" U.S. occupation of the land which he said was now used for "dirty work".[FONT=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Castro: Cuba not cashing US Guantanamo rent checks


Am I correct in assuming that you believe that Obama will seek to 'defend' gitmo if Cuba takes it over?

Speak up.[/FONT]

AGAIN, it won't happen! The prison may close you twit, or it may not, but US Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, which the prison is but one component, will not. It didn't when Batista was ousted by Castro, it wasn't because of JFK's Bay of Pigs fiasco, it wasn't during JFK's missile crisis in 1962 and it won't now over 53 years later. It will not be "sold" to China you idiot, and there will be no alteration of the status of the Monroe Doctrine as you asserted! We are still making the lease payments and if the Cubans tried to take it by force, it would be an act of war against the US, twit!

Obama or any other President would be REQUIRED to protect our strategic interests in GITMO. That is unless the president was another all talk chicken hawk coward like Ronnie Raygun who forced humiliation on the Marine Corps forcing them to slink away from Beirut after the deaths of 241 US service men in the truck bombing of 1983, or milk toast Jimmy Carter who gave away the Panama Canal and gave us the black-eye Tehran fuck-up! And who cares if Castro isn't cashing the lease checks, that's his loss, fool, and that doesn't change the status of the 1903 Treaty provisions, Chica!

You need to start talking about shit you know like why Ann Coulter's Adam's Apple got to be so damn large or the nutritional benefits of winter kimchi!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Guanatamo will remain.

 

[Liminal]

Communists, Socialists, Liberals and Progressives........as much relation to each other as.......Fascists, Nazis, Tea Partiers, Birthers, and Trump followers.

OMG!

Yet another moron with an "is not, is noooootttttttt!" post!

Shocker.

Have you ever had a substantial thought of your own? Or are all your best ideas simply links to other people's words?

All the time.

That's the reason

a. you came to try to rebut them...

and

b. you found you couldn't.

There's nothing to rebut, you haven't made an argument.

Earlier, I thought you produced the most inept post.

You've managed to top it.

You are certainly the resident expert on ineptitude.

 

[Liminal]

Communists, Socialists, Liberals and Progressives........as much relation to each other as.......Fascists, Nazis, Tea Partiers, Birthers, and Trump followers.

Here is the perfect example of Communist propaganda! Although you missed one...
Communists, Socialists, Liberals and Progressives
DEMOCRATS at the end!

Or how about this one.....dupe, hoodwink, hoax, swindle, pawn, puppet, Trump follower.

For the education you are so desperately crying out for:

Error | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

I don't recognize your dim witted politically motivated revisionist definitions.

Sums it up....

Summing up is about as much as you can manage anyway.

 

[Liminal]

You say COmmunism, then at the bottom it says Socialism. Er...

Clean off your specs.

The OP explains:

Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.

But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.

How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."


In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:

"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales

Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.

It follows:



1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.

a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.

b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.



2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:

a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.

b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981

c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.




And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society



Read more- if you dare, Liberals.

You're running out of original crackpot ideas.

There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.


Meaning you have to admit that the OP is 100% accurate.

Gracias.

Are you a real person? Or just an automated response?

 

[NYcarbineer]

You say COmmunism, then at the bottom it says Socialism. Er...

Clean off your specs.

The OP explains:

Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.

But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.

How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."


In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:

"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales

Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.

It follows:



1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.

a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.

b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.



2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:

a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.

b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981

c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.




And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society



Read more- if you dare, Liberals.

You're running out of original crackpot ideas.

There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.


Meaning you have to admit that the OP is 100% accurate.

Gracias.

Are you a real person? Or just an automated response?

She is the perfect example of modern American Conservatism.

She is the single best piece of evidence to prove that conservatism will never win.

 

[frigidweirdo]

You say COmmunism, then at the bottom it says Socialism. Er...

Clean off your specs.

The OP explains:

Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.

But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.

How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."


In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:

"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales

Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.

It follows:



1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.

a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.

b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.



2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:

a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.

b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981

c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.




And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society



Read more- if you dare, Liberals.

You're running out of original crackpot ideas.

There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.


Meaning you have to admit that the OP is 100% accurate.

Gracias.

How many Communist countries can you name where private property, private business, capitalism, and free enterprise still thrive?

China......

China abandoned Communism as a failed economic system that only lead to poverty and starvation. 'What was your point?

You asked for a Communist country that has private property etc. I showed you one. That's my point.

What was your point in asking the question?

China has a Communist Party at the head of its government, does it not?

Also under Mao it wasn't really Communist, yes he claimed to be a Communist, but the reality was something rather different, it was Maoism, which was basically whatever Mao wanted at any time in order to keep himself in power.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Obama has been called a Marxist for over 8 years and PoliticalChic is just now having a rightwing delusional Eureka moment.

too funny.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I wonder if PC, our unvetted Korean immigrant, thinks the liberals in South Korea are Communists...

I'd pose that as a question to her, but as we've all learned, her tragic handicap is that she is incapable of giving a straight answer to a direct question.

 

[frigidweirdo]

You say COmmunism, then at the bottom it says Socialism. Er...

Same thing.

It clearly isn't.

Or is this simplified politics for people who don't want to spend the time and brain power to understand things?

 

[American_Jihad]

You say COmmunism, then at the bottom it says Socialism. Er...

I know liberals only remember the last thing they see, But at the top it says:

There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.

Your a frigid weirdo, Moron...

And your whole argument is an insult. Wow, takes a man to insult... right?

Yo cock bite buddy says yes, Salunsky’s 12 Rules for Radicals I likes rules 5 & 6, frigid moron...