Yes, You're A Communist

Did you notice that the Communist Party USA no longer has to run their own candidates? They backed Obama and are for Sanders
 
A candidate like Bernie is good for america. It shows there aren't but a few "socialists"
 
But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.

See? This is one of those threads where by the above statement PoliticalChic calls Joe Biden a Communist,

and then hysterically screams LIAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! at anyone who might simply point that out.
 
Surprising how many good Americans have been fooled into accepting, and voting for, communism. And when the truth is revealed, they are startled, incensed, and furious that anyone would say such a thing.

But it's true. There is no essential difference between communism, socialism, Liberalism and/or Progressivism. At the heart of each is a faith and adherence to big, overarching government, the representative of the collective, at the cost of individual liberty and freedom.

How did communism become the public religion of America? The following will explain, ....as we say in science....'its origin and insertion."


In a recent thread, one that illustrated the connections between environmentalists, communists, with the confiscation of private property, a government school graduate demonstrated how offended she was by posting this as part of a scathing disavowal of the above:

"OP tries to connect communism to the moderate left wing democrats." One More Of Those Environmentalist Fairytales

Clearly, an intervention is sorely needed.

It follows:



1. Karl Marx's lethal philosophy is the basis of both communism and of Nazism.

a. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.

b. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

c. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.



2. I don't use "lethal" in a cavalier fashion: Over 100 million men, women, and children were slaughtered by Soviet Communism alone. When that fact was stated, one inveterate Liberal poster laughed, and said 'You sure it wasn't 100 billion?'
And the horrors of Nazism are well known. But both began here:

a. "Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary." George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.

b. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856,
Journal of the History of Idea, 1981

c. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publically advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.





And this is what we find leading the Democrat Party this very day:
"Bernie Sanders Makes His Pitch for Socialism" Bernie Sanders Outlines A Vision for Fixing American Society



Read more- if you dare, Liberals.


Socialism leads to communism. Socialism doesn't work and communism is how they force people to make it work.

The tactics are old ones and it's just incredible that they can use them today. Of course, a whole new generation who hasn't been properly versed in history means a lot of ignorance.

As in the past, the radicals today convince people that they do things for the greater good. If you disagree with them, they accuse you of being uncaring, selfish and intolerant. No one wants to be considered mean and they eventually go with the flow because they don't want to be singled out by often violent protesters.

It's all mind games and people still fall for it.

Whether it's an expanded welfare state or bringing in large numbers of unvetted refugees, people are flat out told that they are heartless if they oppose any of it.

What most oppose isn't helping people, it's the methods by which we aid those in need. One way would help them back on their feet, the other tends to keep them under the wing of nanny government.

If you oppose refugees, you are ridiculed for being afraid of innocent children and widows. Never mind that there are few of those in the groups. The majority are young males and we are quite certain that a percent are radicals who seek to harm us. Simply bringing up a valid concern will cause the loud mouth radicals to target you.

People have rejected the far left ideology and that is why it was never presented honestly. It was sneaked in bit by bit by shaming people into going along.

Sanders is being honest about socialism, something that was never done in the past. What's changed is that liberals involvement in schools changed the way it was presented to students. It's been pushed as the only fair way while capitalism has been painted as evil.

Even with all that, most liberal politicians continue to lie. They have to since so many older people have had the nerve not to die off like they were supposed to. And there are plenty of younger people who reject socialism and , especially communism, because they understand what it means. A few libs in the past have come right out and said that old people have a duty to die. For now, the left is forced to deal with those who do remember history and have good arguments to explain why the left is wrong.

The scary part is that so many indoctrinated idiots have embraced the idea of socialism because they've been taught that anyone who has money has somehow cheated the rest of us.
 
Did you notice that the Communist Party USA no longer has to run their own candidates? They backed Obama and are for Sanders

They will support Hillary when she wins the nomination. What's the point of running your own candidates when their positions are exactly the same as the positions of the Democrats?
 
I'm not quite sure what the end game of this "you're a communist" thing is.

If a part of the electorate (a) looks at things like Medicare and Social Security and progressive tax rates, thinks they're fine, and then (b) sees the hard Right screaming "THAT'S COMMUNISM! THAT'S SOCIALISM!", it's entirely possible that they think, "oh, well, I like those things, so socialism and communism might not be so bad."

Does this obvious possibility not occur to anyone over there?
.
 
NAME A SINGLE FIRST WORLD MODERN POWER THAT DOESN'T HAVE PUBLIC SERVICES. WE HAVE CLEAN AIR, WATER, FOOD AND SOME OF THE BEST INFRASTRUCTURE ON EARTH THANKS TO IT.
 
[


Socialism leads to communism. Socialism doesn't work and communism is how they force people to make it work.

.

Where has that ever happened? In contrast to the places it's never happened...

It happened in the USSR and in Chile.

Communism is just socialism implemented by people who are serious about it and willing to use force to impose it on a populace that doesn't want it. Of course, no population of people has ever voluntarily adopted communism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top