Yet Another Toddler Accidentally Shot And Killed His Mother

you care more about gun
A 2-year-old boy accidentally shot and killed his mother on Tuesday while she was driving in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. It adds to a growing list of accidental shootings by toddlers.

Patrice Price, 26, was driving her security guard boyfriend’s car on Highway 175 when the 2-year-old fatally shot her in the back with a single bullet.

At least 69 children aged 17 and younger had picked up a gun and accidentally shot someone so far this year, according to data from gun control advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety, issued before this latest tragedy. At least 265 kids were responsible for accidental shootings in 2015.

Yet Another Toddler Accidentally Shot And Killed His Mother
And these extremely rare random happenings must mean that nobody should be allowed to defend themselves and their family.

Is that right, bitch?

When you're done bitching, why don't you get on your knees like a bitch
That is some impressive nonsense.
Why don't you whine some more Ms. pathetic bitch?

Ah yes, caring about children is so pathetic. Sorry but that is just something real men do. You obviously are some lower life form.
you care more about controlling guns than you do children because the only time you mention kids is in gun related threads

They don't come up much in economics which I like to debate. I do say it is crazy to let a child think they should change sexes. Where else do they come up?
 
You're typical of a do-gooder that gets nothing done, more laws does not make the country safer. dumbass

And you sell guns for a living. I'm sure the answer to every problem is gun for you. You care about $$$$$.
My answer is firearms are absolutely harmless on their own, current laws are not being enforced thus criminal control is out of control.
BTW do I make a lot of money by selling guns and ammo? yes... I do have the all time world's best gun salesman... Lol
obama-gun-salesman-of-the-year-fast-and-furious-black.jpg

Has it occurred to you that smart guns would be additional sales?
As soon as they work properly, affordable... But to be honest I don't see that happening, if huge companies such as Apple and Samsung can't get a simple fingerprint reader to work worth a shit, I don't see any point in it.

But they do work. All guns fail.

Robert Spitzer, a SUNY Cortland political science professor and author of The Politics of Gun Control (whom Hayes brought in after Pratt to talk about the issue), said in order for the Armatix iP1 gun to be sold in California, it had to pass a reliability test.

"The standard was a 99 percent successful fire rate, which it met (fire 600 times with 6 or fewer failed discharges)," Spitzer said.

Others stressed that all guns are prone to failure at some point. The mechanical failure rate is often given as 1 in 1,000, and a military weapon’s failure rate is closer to 1 in 10,000, Sebastian said.

"Misfire is embedded in our language," he said.
Have you looked at these guns firsthand?? I have, they are just a 22 Long rifle cartridge. Not acceptable for self-defense. Sure they are in the developmental stage but that's unacceptable right now.
The smart gun function is just another part to fail on the mechanical device, I really don't see any point for it.
I will stick to the traditional firearm.
If it ain't broke don't fix it...
 
My answer is firearms are absolutely harmless on their own, current laws are not being enforced thus criminal control is out of control.
BTW do I make a lot of money by selling guns and ammo? yes... I do have the all time world's best gun salesman... Lol
obama-gun-salesman-of-the-year-fast-and-furious-black.jpg

Has it occurred to you that smart guns would be additional sales?
As soon as they work properly, affordable... But to be honest I don't see that happening, if huge companies such as Apple and Samsung can't get a simple fingerprint reader to work worth a shit, I don't see any point in it.

But they do work. All guns fail.

Robert Spitzer, a SUNY Cortland political science professor and author of The Politics of Gun Control (whom Hayes brought in after Pratt to talk about the issue), said in order for the Armatix iP1 gun to be sold in California, it had to pass a reliability test.

"The standard was a 99 percent successful fire rate, which it met (fire 600 times with 6 or fewer failed discharges)," Spitzer said.

Others stressed that all guns are prone to failure at some point. The mechanical failure rate is often given as 1 in 1,000, and a military weapon’s failure rate is closer to 1 in 10,000, Sebastian said.

"Misfire is embedded in our language," he said.

all guns do not fail. I have been shooting for over 30 years and have never had a gun malfunction because I keep them maintained.
The fucking fingerprint scanner on my lap top regularly fucks up and I have to swipe my finger 2 or more times.

I can just picture that on a gun grip.

"Oh please Mr Criminal could you wait a second before you stab me and rape my wife? You see I have to scan my fingerprint again so my gun will work"

So you shoot just single shot guns? All semi-automatics fail. Seems you don't know much about guns.

Really? None of mine have ever failed.

I've had some bum ammo on occasion but none of my guns have ever failed

Besides you've never even shot a gun so you're no one to talk
 
you care more about gun
And these extremely rare random happenings must mean that nobody should be allowed to defend themselves and their family.

Is that right, bitch?

When you're done bitching, why don't you get on your knees like a bitch
That is some impressive nonsense.
Why don't you whine some more Ms. pathetic bitch?

Ah yes, caring about children is so pathetic. Sorry but that is just something real men do. You obviously are some lower life form.
you care more about controlling guns than you do children because the only time you mention kids is in gun related threads

They don't come up much in economics which I like to debate. I do say it is crazy to let a child think they should change sexes. Where else do they come up?
Why do people like Adolph Hitler and yourself want to disarm the public?
 
you care more about gun
And these extremely rare random happenings must mean that nobody should be allowed to defend themselves and their family.

Is that right, bitch?

When you're done bitching, why don't you get on your knees like a bitch
That is some impressive nonsense.
Why don't you whine some more Ms. pathetic bitch?

Ah yes, caring about children is so pathetic. Sorry but that is just something real men do. You obviously are some lower life form.
you care more about controlling guns than you do children because the only time you mention kids is in gun related threads

They don't come up much in economics which I like to debate. I do say it is crazy to let a child think they should change sexes. Where else do they come up?

no there are just a hell of a lot more things that accidentally kill children than guns but you don't care abou t those things do you?
 

So what ? Hows about 90 days in the slammer for daddy, plus permanent loss of his 2nd amendment rights.....Daddy is too stupid to own a gun.

I don't have a problem with that but that kid getting shot had nothing to do with me or my guns now did it?
Hence, personal responsibility, more laws will not help with that... Lol
 
And you sell guns for a living. I'm sure the answer to every problem is gun for you. You care about $$$$$.
My answer is firearms are absolutely harmless on their own, current laws are not being enforced thus criminal control is out of control.
BTW do I make a lot of money by selling guns and ammo? yes... I do have the all time world's best gun salesman... Lol
obama-gun-salesman-of-the-year-fast-and-furious-black.jpg

Has it occurred to you that smart guns would be additional sales?
As soon as they work properly, affordable... But to be honest I don't see that happening, if huge companies such as Apple and Samsung can't get a simple fingerprint reader to work worth a shit, I don't see any point in it.

But they do work. All guns fail.

Robert Spitzer, a SUNY Cortland political science professor and author of The Politics of Gun Control (whom Hayes brought in after Pratt to talk about the issue), said in order for the Armatix iP1 gun to be sold in California, it had to pass a reliability test.

"The standard was a 99 percent successful fire rate, which it met (fire 600 times with 6 or fewer failed discharges)," Spitzer said.

Others stressed that all guns are prone to failure at some point. The mechanical failure rate is often given as 1 in 1,000, and a military weapon’s failure rate is closer to 1 in 10,000, Sebastian said.

"Misfire is embedded in our language," he said.
Have you looked at these guns firsthand?? I have, they are just a 22 Long rifle cartridge. Not acceptable for self-defense. Sure they are in the developmental stage but that's unacceptable right now.
The smart gun function is just another part to fail on the mechanical device, I really don't see any point for it.
I will stick to the traditional firearm.
If it ain't broke don't fix it...

Not acceptable? In the vast majority of defenses a shot isn't fired. Caliber doesn't matter unless you are trying to sell more expensive ammo.
 
A 2-year-old boy accidentally shot and killed his mother on Tuesday while she was driving in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. It adds to a growing list of accidental shootings by toddlers.

Patrice Price, 26, was driving her security guard boyfriend’s car on Highway 175 when the 2-year-old fatally shot her in the back with a single bullet.

At least 69 children aged 17 and younger had picked up a gun and accidentally shot someone so far this year, according to data from gun control advocacy group Everytown for Gun Safety, issued before this latest tragedy. At least 265 kids were responsible for accidental shootings in 2015.

Yet Another Toddler Accidentally Shot And Killed His Mother
Shit happens, more laws will never augment personal responsibility...

Shit happens, terrorists kill people, more laws will never augment personal responsibility.

Toddlers kill more than terrorists in this country. I guess all that stuff about keeping Moslems out is BS then. Thanks.

Really? So now list over 3000 people toddlers with guns have killed
We have tsa now, no worries.
SO you can't back up your claim that toddlers kill more people than terrorists

got it
 
Has it occurred to you that smart guns would be additional sales?
As soon as they work properly, affordable... But to be honest I don't see that happening, if huge companies such as Apple and Samsung can't get a simple fingerprint reader to work worth a shit, I don't see any point in it.

But they do work. All guns fail.

Robert Spitzer, a SUNY Cortland political science professor and author of The Politics of Gun Control (whom Hayes brought in after Pratt to talk about the issue), said in order for the Armatix iP1 gun to be sold in California, it had to pass a reliability test.

"The standard was a 99 percent successful fire rate, which it met (fire 600 times with 6 or fewer failed discharges)," Spitzer said.

Others stressed that all guns are prone to failure at some point. The mechanical failure rate is often given as 1 in 1,000, and a military weapon’s failure rate is closer to 1 in 10,000, Sebastian said.

"Misfire is embedded in our language," he said.

all guns do not fail. I have been shooting for over 30 years and have never had a gun malfunction because I keep them maintained.
The fucking fingerprint scanner on my lap top regularly fucks up and I have to swipe my finger 2 or more times.

I can just picture that on a gun grip.

"Oh please Mr Criminal could you wait a second before you stab me and rape my wife? You see I have to scan my fingerprint again so my gun will work"

So you shoot just single shot guns? All semi-automatics fail. Seems you don't know much about guns.

Really? None of mine have ever failed.

I've had some bum ammo on occasion but none of my guns have ever failed

Besides you've never even shot a gun so you're no one to talk

Now you are just blatantly dishonest.
 
My answer is firearms are absolutely harmless on their own, current laws are not being enforced thus criminal control is out of control.
BTW do I make a lot of money by selling guns and ammo? yes... I do have the all time world's best gun salesman... Lol
obama-gun-salesman-of-the-year-fast-and-furious-black.jpg

Has it occurred to you that smart guns would be additional sales?
As soon as they work properly, affordable... But to be honest I don't see that happening, if huge companies such as Apple and Samsung can't get a simple fingerprint reader to work worth a shit, I don't see any point in it.

But they do work. All guns fail.

Robert Spitzer, a SUNY Cortland political science professor and author of The Politics of Gun Control (whom Hayes brought in after Pratt to talk about the issue), said in order for the Armatix iP1 gun to be sold in California, it had to pass a reliability test.

"The standard was a 99 percent successful fire rate, which it met (fire 600 times with 6 or fewer failed discharges)," Spitzer said.

Others stressed that all guns are prone to failure at some point. The mechanical failure rate is often given as 1 in 1,000, and a military weapon’s failure rate is closer to 1 in 10,000, Sebastian said.

"Misfire is embedded in our language," he said.
Have you looked at these guns firsthand?? I have, they are just a 22 Long rifle cartridge. Not acceptable for self-defense. Sure they are in the developmental stage but that's unacceptable right now.
The smart gun function is just another part to fail on the mechanical device, I really don't see any point for it.
I will stick to the traditional firearm.
If it ain't broke don't fix it...

Not acceptable? In the vast majority of defenses a shot isn't fired. Caliber doesn't matter unless you are trying to sell more expensive ammo.

A .22 LR does not have much stopping power if you knew anything about guns you would know that
 
Shit happens, more laws will never augment personal responsibility...

Shit happens, terrorists kill people, more laws will never augment personal responsibility.

Toddlers kill more than terrorists in this country. I guess all that stuff about keeping Moslems out is BS then. Thanks.

Really? So now list over 3000 people toddlers with guns have killed
We have tsa now, no worries.
SO you can't back up your claim that toddlers kill more people than terrorists

got it

In the last 5 years. Make you feel better?
 
As soon as they work properly, affordable... But to be honest I don't see that happening, if huge companies such as Apple and Samsung can't get a simple fingerprint reader to work worth a shit, I don't see any point in it.

But they do work. All guns fail.

Robert Spitzer, a SUNY Cortland political science professor and author of The Politics of Gun Control (whom Hayes brought in after Pratt to talk about the issue), said in order for the Armatix iP1 gun to be sold in California, it had to pass a reliability test.

"The standard was a 99 percent successful fire rate, which it met (fire 600 times with 6 or fewer failed discharges)," Spitzer said.

Others stressed that all guns are prone to failure at some point. The mechanical failure rate is often given as 1 in 1,000, and a military weapon’s failure rate is closer to 1 in 10,000, Sebastian said.

"Misfire is embedded in our language," he said.

all guns do not fail. I have been shooting for over 30 years and have never had a gun malfunction because I keep them maintained.
The fucking fingerprint scanner on my lap top regularly fucks up and I have to swipe my finger 2 or more times.

I can just picture that on a gun grip.

"Oh please Mr Criminal could you wait a second before you stab me and rape my wife? You see I have to scan my fingerprint again so my gun will work"

So you shoot just single shot guns? All semi-automatics fail. Seems you don't know much about guns.

Really? None of mine have ever failed.

I've had some bum ammo on occasion but none of my guns have ever failed

Besides you've never even shot a gun so you're no one to talk

Now you are just blatantly dishonest.

Sorry but no but you have never shot a gun and I know you do not know how to maintain them

I have shot thousands of round through my weapons and the gun itself has never failed. I've had some ammo fail due to a bad primer or some other physical reason but it was never the gun itself
 
Has it occurred to you that smart guns would be additional sales?
As soon as they work properly, affordable... But to be honest I don't see that happening, if huge companies such as Apple and Samsung can't get a simple fingerprint reader to work worth a shit, I don't see any point in it.

But they do work. All guns fail.

Robert Spitzer, a SUNY Cortland political science professor and author of The Politics of Gun Control (whom Hayes brought in after Pratt to talk about the issue), said in order for the Armatix iP1 gun to be sold in California, it had to pass a reliability test.

"The standard was a 99 percent successful fire rate, which it met (fire 600 times with 6 or fewer failed discharges)," Spitzer said.

Others stressed that all guns are prone to failure at some point. The mechanical failure rate is often given as 1 in 1,000, and a military weapon’s failure rate is closer to 1 in 10,000, Sebastian said.

"Misfire is embedded in our language," he said.
Have you looked at these guns firsthand?? I have, they are just a 22 Long rifle cartridge. Not acceptable for self-defense. Sure they are in the developmental stage but that's unacceptable right now.
The smart gun function is just another part to fail on the mechanical device, I really don't see any point for it.
I will stick to the traditional firearm.
If it ain't broke don't fix it...

Not acceptable? In the vast majority of defenses a shot isn't fired. Caliber doesn't matter unless you are trying to sell more expensive ammo.

A .22 LR does not have much stopping power if you knew anything about guns you would know that

2aguy has told me many times a shot doesn't need to be fired. Who cares about stopping power? Link where it didn't stop someone.
 
you care more about gun
That is some impressive nonsense.
Why don't you whine some more Ms. pathetic bitch?

Ah yes, caring about children is so pathetic. Sorry but that is just something real men do. You obviously are some lower life form.
you care more about controlling guns than you do children because the only time you mention kids is in gun related threads

They don't come up much in economics which I like to debate. I do say it is crazy to let a child think they should change sexes. Where else do they come up?

no there are just a hell of a lot more things that accidentally kill children than guns but you don't care abou t those things do you?
You probably will not see him marching down your street on some massive crusade against swimming pools anytime soon.

He's an idiot.
 
you care more about gun
That is some impressive nonsense.
Why don't you whine some more Ms. pathetic bitch?

Ah yes, caring about children is so pathetic. Sorry but that is just something real men do. You obviously are some lower life form.
you care more about controlling guns than you do children because the only time you mention kids is in gun related threads

They don't come up much in economics which I like to debate. I do say it is crazy to let a child think they should change sexes. Where else do they come up?

no there are just a hell of a lot more things that accidentally kill children than guns but you don't care abou t those things do you?

Should I suggest banning bathing children?
 
My answer is firearms are absolutely harmless on their own, current laws are not being enforced thus criminal control is out of control.
BTW do I make a lot of money by selling guns and ammo? yes... I do have the all time world's best gun salesman... Lol
obama-gun-salesman-of-the-year-fast-and-furious-black.jpg

Has it occurred to you that smart guns would be additional sales?
As soon as they work properly, affordable... But to be honest I don't see that happening, if huge companies such as Apple and Samsung can't get a simple fingerprint reader to work worth a shit, I don't see any point in it.

But they do work. All guns fail.

Robert Spitzer, a SUNY Cortland political science professor and author of The Politics of Gun Control (whom Hayes brought in after Pratt to talk about the issue), said in order for the Armatix iP1 gun to be sold in California, it had to pass a reliability test.

"The standard was a 99 percent successful fire rate, which it met (fire 600 times with 6 or fewer failed discharges)," Spitzer said.

Others stressed that all guns are prone to failure at some point. The mechanical failure rate is often given as 1 in 1,000, and a military weapon’s failure rate is closer to 1 in 10,000, Sebastian said.

"Misfire is embedded in our language," he said.
Have you looked at these guns firsthand?? I have, they are just a 22 Long rifle cartridge. Not acceptable for self-defense. Sure they are in the developmental stage but that's unacceptable right now.
The smart gun function is just another part to fail on the mechanical device, I really don't see any point for it.
I will stick to the traditional firearm.
If it ain't broke don't fix it...

Not acceptable? In the vast majority of defenses a shot isn't fired. Caliber doesn't matter unless you are trying to sell more expensive ammo.
Caliber does not matter in self-defense??:bang3::banghead: You are as stupid as a bag of hammers if you think that.
Please educate yourself on the matter before you speak… Dumbass
 

So what ? Hows about 90 days in the slammer for daddy, plus permanent loss of his 2nd amendment rights.....Daddy is too stupid to own a gun.

I don't have a problem with that but that kid getting shot had nothing to do with me or my guns now did it?
Than you won't mind losing your 2nd amendment rights along with your freedom when the same thing happens to you & yours.
 
Shit happens, terrorists kill people, more laws will never augment personal responsibility.

Toddlers kill more than terrorists in this country. I guess all that stuff about keeping Moslems out is BS then. Thanks.

Really? So now list over 3000 people toddlers with guns have killed
We have tsa now, no worries.
SO you can't back up your claim that toddlers kill more people than terrorists

got it

In the last 5 years. Make you feel better?

So now you are changing the parameters as usual
 
Has it occurred to you that smart guns would be additional sales?
As soon as they work properly, affordable... But to be honest I don't see that happening, if huge companies such as Apple and Samsung can't get a simple fingerprint reader to work worth a shit, I don't see any point in it.

But they do work. All guns fail.

Robert Spitzer, a SUNY Cortland political science professor and author of The Politics of Gun Control (whom Hayes brought in after Pratt to talk about the issue), said in order for the Armatix iP1 gun to be sold in California, it had to pass a reliability test.

"The standard was a 99 percent successful fire rate, which it met (fire 600 times with 6 or fewer failed discharges)," Spitzer said.

Others stressed that all guns are prone to failure at some point. The mechanical failure rate is often given as 1 in 1,000, and a military weapon’s failure rate is closer to 1 in 10,000, Sebastian said.

"Misfire is embedded in our language," he said.
Have you looked at these guns firsthand?? I have, they are just a 22 Long rifle cartridge. Not acceptable for self-defense. Sure they are in the developmental stage but that's unacceptable right now.
The smart gun function is just another part to fail on the mechanical device, I really don't see any point for it.
I will stick to the traditional firearm.
If it ain't broke don't fix it...

Not acceptable? In the vast majority of defenses a shot isn't fired. Caliber doesn't matter unless you are trying to sell more expensive ammo.
Caliber does not matter in self-defense??:bang3::banghead: You are as stupid as a bag of hammers if you think that.
Please educate yourself on the matter before you speak… Dumbass

Ok when has it mattered in your personal self defense?
 

So what ? Hows about 90 days in the slammer for daddy, plus permanent loss of his 2nd amendment rights.....Daddy is too stupid to own a gun.

I don't have a problem with that but that kid getting shot had nothing to do with me or my guns now did it?
Than you won't mind losing your 2nd amendment rights along with your freedom when the same thing happens to you & yours.

It won't happen. No kid will ever get his grimy little paws on any of my weapons so no kid will ever shoot himself with one of them

ANd I am all for draconian prison sentences when it comes to crimes committed with guns the harsher the better
 

Forum List

Back
Top