Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
real scientists
Empirical evidence tells us we can have an impact locally but there is no evidence to suggest it is a global impact.
It's too late now....our children and their children will curse those who could have done something and did nothing.
do what?It's too late now....our children and their children will curse those who could have done something and did nothing.
to do what?It's too late now....our children and their children will curse those who could have done something and did nothing.
I think future technology may mitigate a lot of it.
dishonest about what? what could we have affected that would be considered dishonest exactly? Have you been using other electricity and cars than the rest of us? how are you exempt from blame exactly? of what you have no fking clue, but what?real scientists
Do the real scientists doing the work agree with what you said?
Empirical evidence tells us we can have an impact locally but there is no evidence to suggest it is a global impact.
Science is self-correcting. Humans make mistakes and mistakes are sought out and corrected. That's why you read about things like this. Scientists that believe AGW is happening corrected a miscalculation and then WUWT used that work to make AGW look like an unraveling hoax. You people are either unbelievably ignorant or insidiously dishonest.
why did they lie?didn't he say that?Oh..You mean the political hacks in the front office who wouldn't know science if it bit them on the ass?I do... I talk with three of them on a regular basis during conference calls on NH weather patterns and modeling output. You would be surprised what their real positions are.
Those three people are not the people we were talking about.
No, I mean the scientists that did the report this thread is based on.
The people that did the report wouldn't know science if it bit them on the ass?
why did they lie?didn't he say that?Oh..You mean the political hacks in the front office who wouldn't know science if it bit them on the ass?Those three people are not the people we were talking about.
No, I mean the scientists that did the report this thread is based on.
The people that did the report wouldn't know science if it bit them on the ass?
what is it you think they did wrong?why did they lie?didn't he say that?Oh..You mean the political hacks in the front office who wouldn't know science if it bit them on the ass?
No, I mean the scientists that did the report this thread is based on.
The people that did the report wouldn't know science if it bit them on the ass?
Maybe they were just wrong. And I was talking about the people that contradicted them. You know, the scientists this thread is propping up as the real ones taking it to the AGW lunatics. Oh wait! They are AGW lunatics too!
what will they ask exactly? since you can't say what it is they'd be short on. funny, you ain't evha got an answer.That will be a wonderful answer to give the next generation.do what?It's too late now....our children and their children will curse those who could have done something and did nothing.
The real tragedy will be; why did you not prepare for the coming ice age? Why did you not prepare a way to feed us? As millions die of starvation they will realize that AGW was a scam that cost them their very lives..what will they ask exactly? since you can't say what it is they'd be short on. funny, you ain't evha got an answer.That will be a wonderful answer to give the next generation.do what?It's too late now....our children and their children will curse those who could have done something and did nothing.
nope, they'd be, like duh, where's my money?The real tragedy will be why did you not prepare for the coming ice age? Why did you not prepare a way to feed us?what will they ask exactly? since you can't say what it is they'd be short on. funny, you ain't evha got an answer.That will be a wonderful answer to give the next generation.do what?It's too late now....our children and their children will curse those who could have done something and did nothing.
Only the indoctrinated, well to do idiots will be alive to ask this question.nope, they'd be, like duh, where's my money?The real tragedy will be why did you not prepare for the coming ice age? Why did you not prepare a way to feed us?what will they ask exactly? since you can't say what it is they'd be short on. funny, you ain't evha got an answer.That will be a wonderful answer to give the next generation.do what?It's too late now....our children and their children will curse those who could have done something and did nothing.
The AGW hypothesis is falsified and they admit it..
Why do they think AGW is happening regardless of this report? They are qualified scientists reporting facts.
Grow up, the premise of the thread is they were caught supplying false data and they did.
Even if that's true it doesn't change anything about what the most qualified people believe based on the evidence we have.
Do climate scientists think it is happening? Some I suppose.
group think.
error cascade
Grow up, the premise of the thread is they were caught supplying false data and they did.
Even if that's true it doesn't change anything about what the most qualified people believe based on the evidence we have.
What evidence is that? I constantly ask for a single piece of observed measured evidence which supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability..and no such evidence is ever forthcoming because no such evidence exists...
I ask for a single piece of observed, measured evidence which establishes a coherent relationship between the absorption of infrared radiation by a gas and warming in the atmosphere...again..no such evidence will ever be forthcoming because no such evidnence exists...
And I point out that there has never been a paper published in which the claimed warming, due to our production of greenhouse gasses has been empirically measured, quantified, and blamed on those greenhouse gasses. Not a single paper...Lacking such fundamental evidence, what sort of evidence do you believe exists that supports the hypothesis over natural variably?
They believe as I do that man has an impact
Hmm...
So AGW is real to some extent in your opinion?
but the current modeling and hypotheses is failed.
Oh? Could you link me to some stuff where they go into depth about their position on AGW and how they disagree with the current modeling and hypotheses?
How many would you like...paper after paper has been published calling climate models into question when their output is compared to reality...
Do climate scientists think it is happening? Some I suppose.
Bullshit dude. You saying "some of them" after all of the hours of conversation you've had with me and others shows definitively that for some reason you're not interested in having an open and honest conversation about this. You bob and weave and mitigate reality. Why?
group think.
error cascade
If you've figured out something significant you should be able to demonstrate it to scientists and change their mind.