Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They can't afford to have kids, so they should kill them in the womb?
They can't afford to have kids, so they should kill them in the womb?
There is no killing involved.
They can't afford to have kids, so they should kill them in the womb?
There is no killing involved. She has a constitutionally-protected right to do so, and I'm pretty sure the constitution does not protect killing.
If she miscarries, is she guilty of manslaughter? Her body expelled the fetus. Granted it was involuntary, but in your world, a 'death' was the end result.
So human life is just a matter of cash value to you?
So human life is just a matter of cash value to you?
I take it then you're volunteering to pay to support these children? After all, if money really is not the issue, as you claim, then all of your money should be no issue either.
If you're not willing to pay up, you should shut your hypocritical mouth, so that you'd stop embarrassing yourself by spouting such transparent BS.
Back in the real world, one that pro-lifers don't inhabit, money matters. Anyone who says you can't put a price tag on human life is either stupid, deluded or lying. In any of those cases, they're not worth talking to.
So human life is just a matter of cash value to you?
I take it then you're volunteering to pay to support these children? .
Back in the real world, one that pro-lifers don't inhabit, money matters. Anyone who says you can't put a price tag on human life is either stupid, deluded or lying. In any of those cases, they're not worth talking to.
The issue in this case is not whether or not she can have an abortion, the issue is whether she can get an abortion without the consent of her parents or guardian. She presented no evidence that her guardians might abuse her if she consulted them, thus her burden becomes much more difficult to establish a level of maturity entitling her to be an emancipated minor. She failed to meet that burden.
She will now have to seek the consent of her legal guardian.
They can't afford to have kids, so they should kill them in the womb?
That's class warfare, isn't it?
The issue in this case is not whether or not she can have an abortion, the issue is whether she can get an abortion without the consent of her parents or guardian. She presented no evidence that her guardians might abuse her if she consulted them, thus her burden becomes much more difficult to establish a level of maturity entitling her to be an emancipated minor. She failed to meet that burden.
She will now have to seek the consent of her legal guardian.
The issue in this case is not whether or not she can have an abortion, the issue is whether she can get an abortion without the consent of her parents or guardian. She presented no evidence that her guardians might abuse her if she consulted them, thus her burden becomes much more difficult to establish a level of maturity entitling her to be an emancipated minor. She failed to meet that burden.
She will now have to seek the consent of her legal guardian.
Her legal guardians won't let her abort because they are crazy religious anti abortion freaks.
Bataillon rejected the girl's request, saying that for the purpose of her case, her foster parents would serve as her guardians — even though, under Nebraska law, the department is considered the guardian of wards. Bataillon also found that the girl had not shown she was mature enough to make the decision to seek an abortion.
Mahern appealed the girl's case, saying Bataillon failed to recognize the exception for abuse in Nebraska's parental consent law. She also said Bataillon should have recused himself because he was not impartial, as evidenced by his asking the girl if she knew that, "When you have the abortion, it's going to kill the child inside you."
"Probably the most disturbing aspect of this case was the judge's treatment of this young lady, referring to killing her baby," Mahern said Friday. "Who talks to a distressed 16-year-old girl like that?"
Court records found online make reference to a Peter Bataillon who served in the 1980s on a committee for Metro Right to Life, an Omaha anti-abortion group.
Bataillon did not immediately return a message Friday seeking comment on whether he had ever served on a committee for that or any other anti-abortion group.
Under an expedited process, the Nebraska Supreme Court upheld Bataillon's ruling in August but did not issue a public opinion on it until Friday.
The issue in this case is not whether or not she can have an abortion, the issue is whether she can get an abortion without the consent of her parents or guardian. She presented no evidence that her guardians might abuse her if she consulted them, thus her burden becomes much more difficult to establish a level of maturity entitling her to be an emancipated minor. She failed to meet that burden.
She will now have to seek the consent of her legal guardian.
Her legal guardians won't let her abort because they are crazy religious anti abortion freaks.
You keep saying things you don't know.
Her legal guardians won't let her abort because they are crazy religious anti abortion freaks.
You keep saying things you don't know.
So her foster parents are not religious?
The girl, who is not named in the opinion, was living with foster parents this year when a juvenile court terminated the parental rights of her biological parents, who had physically abused and neglected her. In a closed hearing this summer, she told Douglas County District Judge Peter Bataillon she was 10 weeks pregnant and asked for a court order allowing an abortion. She said she would not be able to financially support a child and feared she might lose her foster placement if her foster parents, whom she described as having strong religious beliefs, learned of her pregnancy.
Her legal guardians won't let her abort because they are crazy religious anti abortion freaks.
You keep saying things you don't know.
So her foster parents are not religious?
You keep saying things you don't know.
So her foster parents are not religious?
From my most recent link;
The girl, who is not named in the opinion, was living with foster parents this year when a juvenile court terminated the parental rights of her biological parents, who had physically abused and neglected her. In a closed hearing this summer, she told Douglas County District Judge Peter Bataillon she was 10 weeks pregnant and asked for a court order allowing an abortion. She said she would not be able to financially support a child and feared she might lose her foster placement if her foster parents, whom she described as having strong religious beliefs, learned of her pregnancy.
