You Republicans Are Crazy

Notice the frivolous crap that passes for political analysis in the minds of the low information left and ignorant Euros? Instead of posting legitimate arguments, they post junk that a grammar school kid wouldn't even attempt on a school paper. "We laughed at Trump" passes for political analysis in their small minds while the jihad is overrunning Europe and the kings and queens they keep electing ain't got a clue.
Don't forget Canadians are laughing at Republicans too. Meanwhile Rome isn't actually burning. Relax.

What do you and trump know that the generals don't?

Oh, and the rest of the world agrees with us bush lied us into Iraq and he created isis. Or did you forget Canada knew bush was lying from the beginning and didn't participate. American Republicans were mad at Canada and the Dixie chics.

Today even England understands bush Blair lie us into Iraq.

The media ain't liberal if you don't know it


I keep saying when Rome's burned to the ground is when the subjects became the servants...just like you became today. You are willing to let the democrats tax you out of exsistance
I have hundreds of thousands saved and I've never made 6 figures

So this is about you now? I thought you cared for the workers in your state , what about the poor snuck making $10 bucks an hour and a $100 bucks he has he can only buy $80 dollar of goods compared to a red state workers $100 bucks of goods is a $100 bucks worth?
Huh? The point is this isn't about me. Democrats are about we. I realize it's better when we all do better. Not just the rich.

We do better when demand is high. More money in our pockets. Being able to save and retire at 65. And not go broke when we get sick.

You worry for the rich who are fine btw
Bullshit I worry about myself and my bottom line. Policies that bring jobs and low taxes is who I vote for. That's republicans.

How is city, states and company's like GM going to fund those huge trillions of dollar unfunded pension programs with out cutting those pension programs and raise taxes?

You raise taxes anymore you screw the little guy , the worker in those states and the people who are retired..

Btw that's the only good point in obama care...
 
I'm laughing at Europeans taking Muslims and dying in droves......now who's fucking stupid?

Thread end right here. OP just got punked.

/CLOSE
Are we dying in droves? More white American mass murders than Muslim Americans.

We don't pass gun control even though Americans are "dying in droves"

Blacks in the liberal run inner cities are dying in droves, which is one more reason to vote Trump/Pence.
 
Today even England understands bush Blair lie us into Iraq.

The media ain't liberal if you don't know it
Sure booboo, you keep running with that. Just don't run with scissors. Iraq wasn't a lie though and Hillary voted for it too so there is that.
Hillary voted for it too! You Republicans are really really pathetic. Your party plans the 2003 invasion in 1999 and your comeback is hillary fell for it too?

Are you suggesting hillary knew it was a lie? Or was she lied to too? Because I was for invasion too. I believed Bush's bad Intel. You guys want to pretend it was a mistake not intentional?
The party planned the invasion in '99? Where's your proof? And you are saying Hillary was too stupid to understand what was going on? As far as intel goes, it's been discussed for two decades, no one can understand it for you.
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
 
Today even England understands bush Blair lie us into Iraq.

The media ain't liberal if you don't know it
Sure booboo, you keep running with that. Just don't run with scissors. Iraq wasn't a lie though and Hillary voted for it too so there is that.
Hillary voted for it too! You Republicans are really really pathetic. Your party plans the 2003 invasion in 1999 and your comeback is hillary fell for it too?

Are you suggesting hillary knew it was a lie? Or was she lied to too? Because I was for invasion too. I believed Bush's bad Intel. You guys want to pretend it was a mistake not intentional?
The party planned the invasion in '99? Where's your proof? And you are saying Hillary was too stupid to understand what was going on? As far as intel goes, it's been discussed for two decades, no one can understand it for you.
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
 
Today even England understands bush Blair lie us into Iraq.

The media ain't liberal if you don't know it
Sure booboo, you keep running with that. Just don't run with scissors. Iraq wasn't a lie though and Hillary voted for it too so there is that.
Hillary voted for it too! You Republicans are really really pathetic. Your party plans the 2003 invasion in 1999 and your comeback is hillary fell for it too?

Are you suggesting hillary knew it was a lie? Or was she lied to too? Because I was for invasion too. I believed Bush's bad Intel. You guys want to pretend it was a mistake not intentional?
The party planned the invasion in '99? Where's your proof? And you are saying Hillary was too stupid to understand what was going on? As far as intel goes, it's been discussed for two decades, no one can understand it for you.
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
 
Sure booboo, you keep running with that. Just don't run with scissors. Iraq wasn't a lie though and Hillary voted for it too so there is that.
Hillary voted for it too! You Republicans are really really pathetic. Your party plans the 2003 invasion in 1999 and your comeback is hillary fell for it too?

Are you suggesting hillary knew it was a lie? Or was she lied to too? Because I was for invasion too. I believed Bush's bad Intel. You guys want to pretend it was a mistake not intentional?
The party planned the invasion in '99? Where's your proof? And you are saying Hillary was too stupid to understand what was going on? As far as intel goes, it's been discussed for two decades, no one can understand it for you.
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
More excuses, you inbred fuck?
Lol
 
Sure booboo, you keep running with that. Just don't run with scissors. Iraq wasn't a lie though and Hillary voted for it too so there is that.
Hillary voted for it too! You Republicans are really really pathetic. Your party plans the 2003 invasion in 1999 and your comeback is hillary fell for it too?

Are you suggesting hillary knew it was a lie? Or was she lied to too? Because I was for invasion too. I believed Bush's bad Intel. You guys want to pretend it was a mistake not intentional?
The party planned the invasion in '99? Where's your proof? And you are saying Hillary was too stupid to understand what was going on? As far as intel goes, it's been discussed for two decades, no one can understand it for you.
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
Tony Blair knew. Tony Blair's emails tell us him and bush were going to invade Iraq long before hillary voted.

But Republicans don't care about those emails. Emails that prove bush is a lying mass murderer.

But they want to "lock her up". Lol
 
Hillary voted for it too! You Republicans are really really pathetic. Your party plans the 2003 invasion in 1999 and your comeback is hillary fell for it too?

Are you suggesting hillary knew it was a lie? Or was she lied to too? Because I was for invasion too. I believed Bush's bad Intel. You guys want to pretend it was a mistake not intentional?
The party planned the invasion in '99? Where's your proof? And you are saying Hillary was too stupid to understand what was going on? As far as intel goes, it's been discussed for two decades, no one can understand it for you.
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
More excuses, you inbred fuck?
Lol
If the excuse is legit
 
Hillary voted for it too! You Republicans are really really pathetic. Your party plans the 2003 invasion in 1999 and your comeback is hillary fell for it too?

Are you suggesting hillary knew it was a lie? Or was she lied to too? Because I was for invasion too. I believed Bush's bad Intel. You guys want to pretend it was a mistake not intentional?
The party planned the invasion in '99? Where's your proof? And you are saying Hillary was too stupid to understand what was going on? As far as intel goes, it's been discussed for two decades, no one can understand it for you.
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
Tony Blair knew. Tony Blair's emails tell us him and bush were going to invade Iraq long before hillary voted.

But Republicans don't care about those emails. Emails that prove bush is a lying mass murderer.

But they want to "lock her up". Lol
I was not for the war, but talk about going back and rehashing. Get a grip you silly fuck.
Water under the bridge

Cry me a River bed wetter...
 
The party planned the invasion in '99? Where's your proof? And you are saying Hillary was too stupid to understand what was going on? As far as intel goes, it's been discussed for two decades, no one can understand it for you.
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
Tony Blair knew. Tony Blair's emails tell us him and bush were going to invade Iraq long before hillary voted.

But Republicans don't care about those emails. Emails that prove bush is a lying mass murderer.

But they want to "lock her up". Lol
I was not for the war, but talk about going back and rehashing. Get a grip you silly fuck.
Water under the bridge

Cry me a River bed wetter...
Tell that to the families of the 5000 dead and thousands injured.

It just puts Benghazi into perspective. Benghazi is water under the bridge too right?
 
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
Tony Blair knew. Tony Blair's emails tell us him and bush were going to invade Iraq long before hillary voted.

But Republicans don't care about those emails. Emails that prove bush is a lying mass murderer.

But they want to "lock her up". Lol
I was not for the war, but talk about going back and rehashing. Get a grip you silly fuck.
Water under the bridge

Cry me a River bed wetter...
Tell that to the families of the 5000 dead and thousands injured.

It just puts Benghazi into perspective. Benghazi is water under the bridge too right?
Career politicians getaway with whatever they want, they own the federal government.

Dip shit, there is reason soldiers and their families overwhelmingly support conservatives... It's a military thing you may not understand. LOL
 
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
Tony Blair knew. Tony Blair's emails tell us him and bush were going to invade Iraq long before hillary voted.

But Republicans don't care about those emails. Emails that prove bush is a lying mass murderer.

But they want to "lock her up". Lol
I was not for the war, but talk about going back and rehashing. Get a grip you silly fuck.
Water under the bridge

Cry me a River bed wetter...
Tell that to the families of the 5000 dead and thousands injured.

It just puts Benghazi into perspective. Benghazi is water under the bridge too right?
Career politicians getaway with whatever they want, they own the federal government.

Dip shit, there is reason soldiers and their families overwhelmingly support conservatives... It's a military thing you may not understand. LOL
If that's even still true. It was before bush. Democrats definitely spend less on the military. But it turns out dems support the troops more than Republicans. At least that was true when Obama beat McCain. The GOP supports the military, not the troops.

And troops are brainwashed by conservative generals.

Anyways, I don't think the troops vote GOP like blacks vote overwhelmingly democratic. I think you are assuming.
 
My friends in Europe can't believe trump. My Canadian friend today said they are laughing their asses off at us. Trumps a joke.

Do Americans live in a bubble? Is the so called liberal media hiding this from us? Why don't we know the world is laughing at the fact the Republicans nominated trump? Or they are afraid.

Even Putin is punking trump/us.

If wikileaks finds something bad about hillary we will nominate Tim Kaine. He's got no dirt and a great record. Or biden. Or AL gore
Check Open Primary results. the Democrats helped the Republicans nominate Trump. I know for a fact this has been explained to you, but I suppose Democrats would forget that fact if it helps them shift the blame.
If pure Conservatism is always a winning strategy, why didn't the American Conservatives step up and nominate a true Conservative? If the Tea Party movement is to be taken seriously, why did they fail on the biggest stage in American politics?

Republicans and Republicans alone are to blame for the Trump nomination. I understand the buyer's remorse, but you guys had 17 potential candidates, yet you nominated an incorrigible, reckless, feckless moral Pygmy with disastrous comportment and a distinctly in artful style.

Check the scapegoats at the door. Republicans have only themselves to blame.
. Might not be any blame any longer, as they all are globalist now, and the last throws of America, Americanism & patriotism are being used up in this election like a cheap roll of toilet paper. After this, we will be done as Americans. Deal with it or not.
 
My friends in Europe can't believe trump. My Canadian friend today said they are laughing their asses off at us. Trumps a joke.

Do Americans live in a bubble? Is the so called liberal media hiding this from us? Why don't we know the world is laughing at the fact the Republicans nominated trump? Or they are afraid.

Even Putin is punking trump/us.

If wikileaks finds something bad about hillary we will nominate Tim Kaine. He's got no dirt and a great record. Or biden. Or AL gore
Check Open Primary results. the Democrats helped the Republicans nominate Trump. I know for a fact this has been explained to you, but I suppose Democrats would forget that fact if it helps them shift the blame.
If pure Conservatism is always a winning strategy, why didn't the American Conservatives step up and nominate a true Conservative? If the Tea Party movement is to be taken seriously, why did they fail on the biggest stage in American politics?

Republicans and Republicans alone are to blame for the Trump nomination. I understand the buyer's remorse, but you guys had 17 potential candidates, yet you nominated an incorrigible, reckless, feckless moral Pygmy with disastrous comportment and a distinctly in artful style.

Check the scapegoats at the door. Republicans have only themselves to blame.
. Might not be any blame any longer, as they all are globalist now, and the last throws of America, Americanism & patriotism are being used up in this election like a cheap roll of toilet paper. After this, we will be done as Americans. Deal with it or not.
How far would your isolationism extend? Trade? War? Immigration?
 
My friends in Europe can't believe trump. My Canadian friend today said they are laughing their asses off at us. Trumps a joke.

Do Americans live in a bubble? Is the so called liberal media hiding this from us? Why don't we know the world is laughing at the fact the Republicans nominated trump? Or they are afraid.

Even Putin is punking trump/us.

If wikileaks finds something bad about hillary we will nominate Tim Kaine. He's got no dirt and a great record. Or biden. Or AL gore
Check Open Primary results. the Democrats helped the Republicans nominate Trump. I know for a fact this has been explained to you, but I suppose Democrats would forget that fact if it helps them shift the blame.
If pure Conservatism is always a winning strategy, why didn't the American Conservatives step up and nominate a true Conservative? If the Tea Party movement is to be taken seriously, why did they fail on the biggest stage in American politics?

Republicans and Republicans alone are to blame for the Trump nomination. I understand the buyer's remorse, but you guys had 17 potential candidates, yet you nominated an incorrigible, reckless, feckless moral Pygmy with disastrous comportment and a distinctly in artful style.

Check the scapegoats at the door. Republicans have only themselves to blame.
. Might not be any blame any longer, as they all are globalist now, and the last throws of America, Americanism & patriotism are being used up in this election like a cheap roll of toilet paper. After this, we will be done as Americans. Deal with it or not.
Did you answer his question? If conservativism is always a winning strategy, why didn't the conservative party nominate a conservative?

Republicans are so fucking stupid. They are either free trade or no free trade. Black or white. They can't understand you if you try to explain trade is OK as long as it's regulated and fair for American workers.

So the same idiots who defended free trade for years are now against any and all trade. In fact now they want to build a wall.
 
My friends in Europe can't believe trump. My Canadian friend today said they are laughing their asses off at us. Trumps a joke.

Do Americans live in a bubble? Is the so called liberal media hiding this from us? Why don't we know the world is laughing at the fact the Republicans nominated trump? Or they are afraid.

Even Putin is punking trump/us.

If wikileaks finds something bad about hillary we will nominate Tim Kaine. He's got no dirt and a great record. Or biden. Or AL gore
FUCK YOUR FRIENDS IN EUROPE. I live in the USA
 
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
Tony Blair knew. Tony Blair's emails tell us him and bush were going to invade Iraq long before hillary voted.

But Republicans don't care about those emails. Emails that prove bush is a lying mass murderer.

But they want to "lock her up". Lol
I was not for the war, but talk about going back and rehashing. Get a grip you silly fuck.
Water under the bridge

Cry me a River bed wetter...
Tell that to the families of the 5000 dead and thousands injured.

It just puts Benghazi into perspective. Benghazi is water under the bridge too right?
Career politicians getaway with whatever they want, they own the federal government.

Dip shit, there is reason soldiers and their families overwhelmingly support conservatives... It's a military thing you may not understand. LOL
If that's even still true. It was before bush. Democrats definitely spend less on the military. But it turns out dems support the troops more than Republicans. At least that was true when Obama beat McCain. The GOP supports the military, not the troops.

And troops are brainwashed by conservative generals.

Anyways, I don't think the troops vote GOP like blacks vote overwhelmingly democratic. I think you are assuming.
Obviously you have no respect for the troops.
Our troops have next to no respect for Barry, Biden and hildabeast...
 
Tony Blair knew. Tony Blair's emails tell us him and bush were going to invade Iraq long before hillary voted.

But Republicans don't care about those emails. Emails that prove bush is a lying mass murderer.

But they want to "lock her up". Lol
I was not for the war, but talk about going back and rehashing. Get a grip you silly fuck.
Water under the bridge

Cry me a River bed wetter...
Tell that to the families of the 5000 dead and thousands injured.

It just puts Benghazi into perspective. Benghazi is water under the bridge too right?
Career politicians getaway with whatever they want, they own the federal government.

Dip shit, there is reason soldiers and their families overwhelmingly support conservatives... It's a military thing you may not understand. LOL
If that's even still true. It was before bush. Democrats definitely spend less on the military. But it turns out dems support the troops more than Republicans. At least that was true when Obama beat McCain. The GOP supports the military, not the troops.

And troops are brainwashed by conservative generals.

Anyways, I don't think the troops vote GOP like blacks vote overwhelmingly democratic. I think you are assuming.
Obviously you have no respect for the troops.
Our troops have next to no respect for Barry, Biden and hildabeast...
Ur an idiot
 
The party planned the invasion in '99? Where's your proof? And you are saying Hillary was too stupid to understand what was going on? As far as intel goes, it's been discussed for two decades, no one can understand it for you.
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
Tony Blair knew. Tony Blair's emails tell us him and bush were going to invade Iraq long before hillary voted.

But Republicans don't care about those emails. Emails that prove bush is a lying mass murderer.

But they want to "lock her up". Lol
I was not for the war, but talk about going back and rehashing. Get a grip you silly fuck.
Water under the bridge

Cry me a River bed wetter...
Then don't bring that stupid mom out at the GOP RNC to say " I blame hillary personally for my son's death". Water under the bridge.

Tell her to stop crying about her one kid. Ask her what about the 5000 deaths bush is responsible for? They're bed wetters too?
 
This is where you nutters go off the rails...

2002, bad Intel means Bush didn't lie and shouldn't be held responsible, as Commander-in-Chief, for invading a country over weapons it turned out they didn't have, which led to the deaths of about 5,000 Americans and more than a hundred thousand Iraqis.

2012, bad Intel means Hillary lied and is responsible for the deaths of 4 Americans who died in a terrorist attack.

:cuckoo:
And they want to blame hillary for voting for the Iraq war, forgetting or ignoring that bush fed her bad Intel.
Not to mention, she didn't vote for any war. How could she? Bush said the resolution she voted for was neither imminent nor unavoidable in terms of going to war. What she and many other Democrats and almost all Republicans voted for was to coerce Hussein to let the weapons inspectors back into Iraq and to make Bush the "decider." Who could have known Bush would pull out the inspectors out before they determined there were no stockpiles of WMDs there; and instead, take us into war?
Tony Blair knew. Tony Blair's emails tell us him and bush were going to invade Iraq long before hillary voted.

But Republicans don't care about those emails. Emails that prove bush is a lying mass murderer.

But they want to "lock her up". Lol
I was not for the war, but talk about going back and rehashing. Get a grip you silly fuck.
Water under the bridge

Cry me a River bed wetter...
Then don't bring that stupid mom out at the GOP RNC to say " I blame hillary personally for my son's death". Water under the bridge.

Tell her to stop crying about her one kid. Ask her what about the 5000 deaths bush is responsible for? They're bed wetters too?
Our troops disagree with you, so it makes your opinion irrelevant
 

Forum List

Back
Top