Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gee-----there were lots of persons of EasternSpencer is Greek Orthodox and discovered hate sells.
you have serious problems in both history andGenesis 49 has only 33 verses, and none suggest that the other tribes of Israel would become "Jews". Also, in order to establish the monastic rule of a Jew over the other tribes of Israel you must subscribe to "British Israelism" as there is no biblical evidence that Jewish rule continued after the death of Zedekiah and his sons. Worse yet, Zedekiah ruled over the "house of Judah" not the ten-tribe northern kingdom of "the house of Israel". That "David would never 'want a man' to rule over the "house of Israel" has perplexed scholars for centuries.
Semantics----the refuge of desperate apologistsGenesis 49 has only 33 verses, and none suggest that the other tribes of Israel would become "Jews". Also, in order to establish the monastic rule of a Jew over the other tribes of Israel you must subscribe to "British Israelism" as there is no biblical evidence that Jewish rule continued after the death of Zedekiah and his sons. Worse yet, Zedekiah ruled over the "house of Judah" not the ten-tribe northern kingdom of "the house of Israel". That "David would never 'want a man' to rule over the "house of Israel" has perplexed scholars for centuries.
Ancient Israel was both "church and state" and was governed by religious rules, thus "monastic rule". When Christ returns the world will be under his monastic rules.you have serious problems in both history and
language, ??? ''''monastic rule..." ???? ----you even
have a problem with the word "house"
Judah received prophecies pertaining to the rule of David's bloodline, which would culminate in the rule of Jesus Christ...Shiloh. David's descendants ruled Israel until the time of Jeroboam and Rehoboam when the house of Judah and the house of Israel were divided into two kingdoms. At that time the "throne of David" no longer ruled over the house of Israel.Semantics----the refuge of desperate apologists
in the mode of Josef Goebbels. For the benefit
of the intellectually intact: Judah was Jacob's
(aka Israel's) fouth Son. On his deathbed----
Jacob named Judah his "HEIR" with rights to rule
over the whole group----aka "the children of "Israel" " ------
I didn't have to be. I was a lower down(in high demend) in a previous life.
New International Version
There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.
Funny. Some things never change
rarebible.wordpress.com
If I may ask, who/what are you responding to here???I didn't have to be. I was a lower down(in high demend) in a previous life.
New International Version
There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.
Funny. Some things never change
Ivan-----you are lame in the gameI'm late in the game.
Regarding those people who said they were never slaves, they were correct.
About 125 BC the King of Yehuda (judah), Iohn Hyrcanus I, 134-104 B.C. invaded Edom and conquered them. Many were brought back because they "converted". By the time of Christ, these converted Edomites had taken over the kinship, priesthood, temple, scribes and lawers. So when these Edomites said they were never slaves, they told the truth; And when they said that, they confessed that they were Edomites pretending to be Yehuda.
the first bit of your intellect that I can recall reading on these boards was your contention that the wordirosie91 Thank You for your judgment, but I don't know your logic in making that judgement. Maybe irosie 91 explain?
Jesus did not speak englishAncient Israel was both "church and state" and was governed by religious rules, thus "monastic rule". When Christ returns the world will be under his monastic rules.
The terms "house of Judah" and "house of Israel" are common references in the OT. Even Jesus used the term "house of Israel" (as distinct from Jewry) when revealing his true ministry.
Ivan-----you are lame in the game
yes it did----the romans exploited that situation to their advantage just as they exploited the 'jesus myth'The forced conversion of the Edomites did change things.. you had Herod and queen Beatrice.
what are you calling "JUDAH" ?Judah received prophecies pertaining to the rule of David's bloodline, which would culminate in the rule of Jesus Christ...Shiloh. David's descendants ruled Israel until the time of Jeroboam and Rehoboam when the house of Judah and the house of Israel were divided into two kingdoms. At that time the "throne of David" no longer ruled over the house of Israel.
the last time I was in a mosque----the "NEW" testament was described as a FRAUD----written
by LIARS-----THE "ENEMEEEEES OF ISLAAAAAM"
(it was a "GOOD FRIDAY" many years ago)
Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over ...
"NEW" testament was described as a FRAUD
yes it did----the romans exploited that situation to their advantage just as they exploited the 'jesus myth'
which is why PHARISEES like Jesus and John (the baptist) were so disgusted with persons like Herod and his whole perverted family and other Roman
appointees like Caiaphas
^^^ non sequitur and diversion typical of theThe Romans didn't force the Edomites to convert to Judaism.
