Darkwind
Diamond Member
- Jun 18, 2009
- 34,980
- 19,549
- 1,915
Oh, so you could have just ignored the entire thread, but instead chose to impose your own bullshit, self-serving hypothetical as a standard.The OP asked if this standard was being applied.ABC: New Jersey Sen. Menendez bribery trial begins with possible political implications
NBC: Sen. Menendez 'sold his office' for ritzy trips, prosecutors say
CBS: Senator Robert Menendez, New Jersey Democrat, "sold his office" prosecutor says at corruption trial - CBS News
CNN: Sen. Bob Menendez's bribery trial: Five things to watch - CNNPolitics
You were saying?
Blog: Did anyone in the media hear that a US senator is on trial?
unless of course the Senator in question happened to be a Republican then it would be covered like it was the end of the world. And the board left wingers would be all over it like flies on sh**. But we hear crickets since its a liberal democrat.
So, is it being covered as if it were the end of the world? You see, he has a point. A half-inch on page 35, or 20 seconds on TV is not the standard that would be used if it were a Republican. It would be multiple articles, above the fold, front page or it would dominate the TV news to the order of 15 minutes as a lead, and at least five minutes at the end of the program.
Is that being done?
I don't accept bullshit self-serving hypotheticals as "standards".
Gotcha.