Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The driver was being a dick. And he needs to learn how to edit a video.
He sure was! Just like the rebels at the Boston Tea Party were being "dicks". Shame on them for not being more polite.
Rebellion is meaningless without a clear purpose. The jackass in the OP was just being a jackass.
Had the cop actually been engaged in unethical behavior, I'd have been in the front row of the cheering section. But being a dickhead for the sake of being a dickhead and then self-promoting such dickheadedness is idiotic, just like the suckers that buy into the garbage.
It was contrived, granted. And the officer who was targeted was "just doing his job". But his job is violating our rights, and it's high time we started making a fuss about it.
Your "rights" extend as far as SCOTUS allows them to extend. These stops have been ruled constitutionally permissible.
The Supreme Court is wrong.
He sure was! Just like the rebels at the Boston Tea Party were being "dicks". Shame on them for not being more polite.
Rebellion is meaningless without a clear purpose. The jackass in the OP was just being a jackass.
Had the cop actually been engaged in unethical behavior, I'd have been in the front row of the cheering section. But being a dickhead for the sake of being a dickhead and then self-promoting such dickheadedness is idiotic, just like the suckers that buy into the garbage.
It was contrived, granted. And the officer who was targeted was "just doing his job". But his job is violating our rights, and it's high time we started making a fuss about it.
Your "rights" extend as far as SCOTUS allows them to extend. These stops have been ruled constitutionally permissible.
The Supreme Court is wrong.
By definition , the Supreme Court can't be wrong about what they rule Constitutional and unconstitutional. I mean they ARE the definition.
You may not like their ruling, but that is irrelevant, they are right no matter how they rule.
[Sure I did, and I figured you'd cherry-pick something irrelevant out of it. It doesn't change the fact that it mentions the supreme court ruling such stops as constitutional. Period.
The cop showed more restraint than I would have, I'd have taken Citizen Dumbass' attitude as probable cause to impound his car for a thorough search at HQ.
Dickheads deserve to be treated like dickheads.
Rebellion is meaningless without a clear purpose. The jackass in the OP was just being a jackass.
Had the cop actually been engaged in unethical behavior, I'd have been in the front row of the cheering section. But being a dickhead for the sake of being a dickhead and then self-promoting such dickheadedness is idiotic, just like the suckers that buy into the garbage.
It was contrived, granted. And the officer who was targeted was "just doing his job". But his job is violating our rights, and it's high time we started making a fuss about it.
Your "rights" extend as far as SCOTUS allows them to extend. These stops have been ruled constitutionally permissible.
The Supreme Court is wrong.
By definition , the Supreme Court can't be wrong about what they rule Constitutional and unconstitutional. I mean they ARE the definition.
You may not like their ruling, but that is irrelevant, they are right no matter how they rule.
Nonsense. They're human beings, and inherently fallible. Take off your blinders.
[Sure I did, and I figured you'd cherry-pick something irrelevant out of it. It doesn't change the fact that it mentions the supreme court ruling such stops as constitutional. Period.
The cop showed more restraint than I would have, I'd have taken Citizen Dumbass' attitude as probable cause to impound his car for a thorough search at HQ.
Dickheads deserve to be treated like dickheads.
I didn't see the video - i block videos. I am going on the comments here.
BUT if a cop abuses his position to impound a car because he doesn't like it that a peasant knows his rights, then that person should not be a cop.
Police should have no powers beyond that which citizens have in a free nation. Equipment violations are valid, random checkpoints are not - regardless of court rulings.
As the nation becomes a police state, the cops have gotten out of control. I am far more concerned with my personal safety when a cop gets on the train I ride than when gang members do. I mean, both are gang members - but cops are more likely to be violent and murder someone innocent than the crips or bloods. The Mongols and Hells Angels were shooting each other in Corona the other night - key phrase - each other.
Cops kick random homeless people to death in Fullerton - which of these gangs poses the most real threat to me and my family? I'm not in the Mongols or Hells Angels - so clearly it is the cops.
Your "rights" extend as far as SCOTUS allows them to extend. These stops have been ruled constitutionally permissible.
Your "rights" extend as far as SCOTUS allows them to extend. These stops have been ruled constitutionally permissible.
Under the right circumstances.
Random checkpoint - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Impounding a vehicle isn't arresting the person, Judge Dipshit.
[Sure I did, and I figured you'd cherry-pick something irrelevant out of it. It doesn't change the fact that it mentions the supreme court ruling such stops as constitutional. Period.
The cop showed more restraint than I would have, I'd have taken Citizen Dumbass' attitude as probable cause to impound his car for a thorough search at HQ.
Dickheads deserve to be treated like dickheads.
I didn't see the video - i block videos. I am going on the comments here.
BUT if a cop abuses his position to impound a car because he doesn't like it that a peasant knows his rights, then that person should not be a cop.
Police should have no powers beyond that which citizens have in a free nation. Equipment violations are valid, random checkpoints are not - regardless of court rulings.
As the nation becomes a police state, the cops have gotten out of control. I am far more concerned with my personal safety when a cop gets on the train I ride than when gang members do. I mean, both are gang members - but cops are more likely to be violent and murder someone innocent than the crips or bloods. The Mongols and Hells Angels were shooting each other in Corona the other night - key phrase - each other.
Cops kick random homeless people to death in Fullerton - which of these gangs poses the most real threat to me and my family? I'm not in the Mongols or Hells Angels - so clearly it is the cops.
Your "rights" extend as far as SCOTUS allows them to extend. These stops have been ruled constitutionally permissible.
Your "rights" extend as far as SCOTUS allows them to extend. These stops have been ruled constitutionally permissible.
Under the right circumstances.
Random checkpoint - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Ah yes Wikipedia, the bastion of accuracy and unimpeachable information.
This is just another example of people not understanding their rights, but thinking they do. People learn your rights...
Impounding a vehicle isn't arresting the person, Judge Dipshit.
No, it's carjacking.
Your "rights" extend as far as SCOTUS allows them to extend. These stops have been ruled constitutionally permissible.
According to you, we have no rights at all, only privilege granted by 9 unelected dictators.
By definition , the Supreme Court can't be wrong about what they rule Constitutional and unconstitutional. I mean they ARE the definition.
You may not like their ruling, but that is irrelevant, they are right no matter how they rule.
Your "rights" extend as far as SCOTUS allows them to extend. These stops have been ruled constitutionally permissible.
According to you, we have no rights at all, only privilege granted by 9 unelected dictators.
Of course they are fallible, but there is no appeal to them. They decide what is constitutional, not you or I. Well I mean obviously the Senate is trying to change that, but.........
Ah yes Wikipedia, the bastion of accuracy and unimpeachable information.
That would require going to the URL, which I haven't since that fateful day in college where I was "corrected" for using such a sewer of a site.Ah yes Wikipedia, the bastion of accuracy and unimpeachable information.
Want to point out what the article got wrong?
