Andylusion
Platinum Member
yes,someone with empathy ,,compassion How TF did we end up with this horrible example of human being?Since most people don't directly vote for policies or laws their is a built-in limit. You vote for someone to represent you, someone who's job it is to carefully consider the implications of what they vote for.How is that a "limit?"There are limits on the will of the people. They call it representative democracy, as opposed to direct democracy and as far as I know, California still falls in the first category.The left is on the side of giving government more power. The right opposes it. It's clearly a "left/right" thing.I hate always repeating myself, but unfortunately many here play right into the hands of the oligarchs whose M.O is divide and conquer. So I'll say it again. It's not a left / right thing. This is a global power grab. A global economic reset. And a global step closer to their goal of global government, aka the New World Order.
The criminals who run this world want complete control of all of us, it's not about left or right but authoritarianism vs freedom/ individual rights. They purposely promote the left/right paradigm so that we are all constantly fighting each other, and keeping our attention off of them.
No, those are the battles, not the war. McConnell protects the Senate, including his Democratic counterpart, Crying Chuck, before he protects us. He makes sure that power is maintained rather than the will of the people is implemented.
First off, the will of the people, is stupid. Go read history. Whenever the "will of the people" rules the land, the land is in Anarchy and chaos.
If we have learned anything, it is that there must be limits on the will of the people. Look at California. That's the will of the people run wild.
I also want to point out that there is a difference between what McConnell does in trying to maintain power for his party regardless of the outcomes of elections. (ramrodding through judges for his own party and blocking judges when not in power, extreme gerrymandering) and protecting people from making uninformed choices.
There is nothing "compassionate" about demanding that OTHER PEOPLE, help others.
You STEALING my income, to give to other people who have not earned it... is not compassion on your part.
This is what cracked me up about Obama. While people were talking about how he was "helping" people, that guy was earning multiple millions, and according to his own records, gave less than 1% of his income to charity.
The Clinton's only made a mockery of charity, by giving money to their own foundations, which largely benefited themselves.
Obama didn't give a penny to help people. He gave YOUR pennies to help people. While he got richer and richer in office, he was demanding that you gave more of your income, to help people who refused to work.
And the mindless left-wing loved him for it.
You people on the left-wing are far more in the pockets of the rich wealthy elites, than conservatives ever have been.