RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
- May 6, 2007
- 56,051
- 18,144
We didn't throw every German American on the East Coast into concentration camps.
![en.wikipedia.org](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a3/German_American_internment_sites_during_World_War_II.jpg/1200px-German_American_internment_sites_during_World_War_II.jpg)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We didn't throw every German American on the East Coast into concentration camps.
we threw a bunvh [sic] in jail and camps and we kept them there unlike the Japanese that were released.
I guess Japan shouldn’t have attacked us first and started the war in the first place.I guess that's why the vast, vast, vast majority of those killed were civilians - women, children, elderly...
Have you once seen me deny it? A foreign military attacked our military. We defeated that military. Then...... I’ve never once seen you address the fact that Japan started the war.
....
The Japanese realized they had no more chances after we dropped the 2nd bombThe U.S. could have waited three days for the Soviet Union to declare war on Japan. After that, the japanese realized that they had no more chances.
The other, more main reason, was to end the war and save countless Japanese and Allied lives.I don't think so, the bomb was used just before the USSR entered the war to show those russians, that Uncle Sam had a new big stick. And that was the main reason for using the bomb.
The USSR had little to no capacity to defeat Japan. Its entry into the war was nothing m ore than a means to better its post-war position.Again, the USSR going to war with Japan meant a quick defeat, but the U.S. didn't wait for that to happen.
I guess Japan shouldn’t have attacked us first and started the war in the first place.
![]()
Internment of German Americans - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I guess Japan shouldn’t have attacked us first and started the war in the first place.
In all the threads about this subject on these boards, I’ve never once seen you address the fact that Japan started the war.
(And, yes, I’m aware WWII had been raging for years already, I’m talking about the Japan vs USA aspect of the war)
What are they?There were many alternatives.
You’re still going to kill thousands of civilians. Tokyo was a civilian target and there were no large rural areas in Japan. It was very densely populated. At least Hiroshima and Nagasaki were military targets.I didn't say that. A detonation over Tokyo Bay or a rural area might have made quite an impression.
Both Hiroshima and Nagasaki were major shipyards that were busy producing suicide boats, kaiten manned torpedoes and Kairyu mini subs to contest the invasion. Nagasaki was also a major IJA aresenal. Both cities were major centers for war production, the Japanese used small mom and pop subcontractors to produce much of their military hardware.I guess that's why the vast, vast, vast majority of those killed were civilians - women, children, elderly...
Naval blockadeWhat are they?
Out in the bay? No.You’re still going to kill thousands of civilians. .....
LOL...... there were no large rural areas in Japan. . .....
Naval blockade that starves millions of Japanese civilians and ALL the allied POWs in Japan. What little food there would be would go to the military. Demonstration nuke strikes would still kill thousands of civilians. Not to mention causing blindness and radiological poisoning on hundreds of thousands down wind from the blast. Japan was and is a densely populated country. Those options are worse than Hiroshima and Nagasaki where damage was limited by the topography.Naval blockade
Demonstration detonation over Tokyo Bay or some rural area
Pursuing the possibility of a negotiated surrender by Japan far sooner