maineman
VIP Member
- Dec 29, 2006
- 13,003
- 574
No, you do it because you know your point can't stand on its own and you need to deflect attention away from your own incompetence.
you really need to get over this mistaken belief that you know people's motivations so well that you can contradict them....it really is quite tedious and sophomoric.
This is only true if the leader stepping down would not further destabalize the government.
For you to be right, you must show that, in Iraq, this to be the case.
Get busy.
No...for me to be wrong, you would need to prove that the result of the leader stepping down would be even greater destabilization... pretty tough to quantify... and, beyond that, you would need to prove that democrats "hoped for" and "actively promoted" that further destabilization and not merely improved performance and increased accountability. Perhaps YOU should get busy.