10:1 Voters Say MSM Is in the Tank for Clinton

[Fenton Lum]

The media has no obligation to be neutral. If it did, about 5000 rightwing 'news' sites would disappear from the internet.

Ethics demand reporting to be either neutral or candid about bias.
But I used that E word, so the left has no clue as to what I'm talking about.

Then name some 'ethical' news outlets.

The Hill is probably the best, but far from what they should be.

White supremacist Trump supporter targets McMullin in Utah robocalls

 

[BuckToothMoron]

The media has no obligation to be neutral. If it did, about 5000 rightwing 'news' sites would disappear from the internet.

Are you married to Candycorn, is she your sister? The media is made up of different parts, and within the media journalist/reporters are different from commentators. Journalist and reporters should have the integrity to report unbiased FACTS, vet sources, and avoid speculation. Media bias applies to those people, not commentators.

If you are indeed married to Candycorn, DONT HAVE KIDS!

 

[Fenton Lum]

The media has no obligation to be neutral. If it did, about 5000 rightwing 'news' sites would disappear from the internet.

Are you married to Candycorn, is she your sister? The media is made up of different parts, and within the media journalist/reporters are different from commentators. Journalist and reporters should have the integrity to report unbiased FACTS, vet sources, and avoid speculation. Media bias applies to those people, not commentators.

If you are indeed married to Candycorn, DONT HAVE KIDS!

It's a for profit business in an economic system we've confused with a twisted version of capitalism. It has one top priority.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

The media has no obligation to be neutral. If it did, about 5000 rightwing 'news' sites would disappear from the internet.

Ethics demand reporting to be either neutral or candid about bias.
But I used that E word, so the left has no clue as to what I'm talking about.

And the editorial content of a news media outlet, what's their obligation?

Yep, you're related to Candycorn, you just confirmed it. I'll give you a hint little fella. Reread your post and focus on the word EDITORIAL. Then google the meaning of editorial, and poof, you solved it all by yourself.

 

[bendog]

The media has no obligation to be neutral. If it did, about 5000 rightwing 'news' sites would disappear from the internet.

Are you married to Candycorn, is she your sister? The media is made up of different parts, and within the media journalist/reporters are different from commentators. Journalist and reporters should have the integrity to report unbiased FACTS, vet sources, and avoid speculation. Media bias applies to those people, not commentators.

If you are indeed married to Candycorn, DONT HAVE KIDS!

It's a for profit business in an economic system we've confused with a twisted version of capitalism. It has one top priority.

But he's right to the extent that different outlets have different consumer groups. It's not monolithic.

 

[Fenton Lum]

The media has no obligation to be neutral. If it did, about 5000 rightwing 'news' sites would disappear from the internet.

Are you married to Candycorn, is she your sister? The media is made up of different parts, and within the media journalist/reporters are different from commentators. Journalist and reporters should have the integrity to report unbiased FACTS, vet sources, and avoid speculation. Media bias applies to those people, not commentators.

If you are indeed married to Candycorn, DONT HAVE KIDS!

It's a for profit business in an economic system we've confused with a twisted version of capitalism. It has one top priority.

But he's right to the extent that different outlets have different consumer groups. It's not monolithic.

Sure, but again, the american public never wants to take any responsibility for anything. If we would merely refuse to respond and/or watch, they would have to change something. But as a whole, we won't alter anything WE do, we just bitch that things won't change.

 

[bendog]

The media has no obligation to be neutral. If it did, about 5000 rightwing 'news' sites would disappear from the internet.

Are you married to Candycorn, is she your sister? The media is made up of different parts, and within the media journalist/reporters are different from commentators. Journalist and reporters should have the integrity to report unbiased FACTS, vet sources, and avoid speculation. Media bias applies to those people, not commentators.

If you are indeed married to Candycorn, DONT HAVE KIDS!

It's a for profit business in an economic system we've confused with a twisted version of capitalism. It has one top priority.

But he's right to the extent that different outlets have different consumer groups. It's not monolithic.

Sure, but again, the american public never wants to take any responsibility for anything. If we would merely refuse to respond and/or watch, they would have to change something. But as a whole, we won't alter anything WE do, we just bitch that things won't change.

I fundamentally disagree. The MSM feeds us what we want, not the other way around. America (and the West) faced its greatest challenge since the height of the cold war in the 60s on 9-11. W did change something, but unfortunately not for the better. We've been playing catchup for over 12 years. It's not the first time it's happened. We had eight years of malaise after losing in Vietnam, and despite all the blood and destruction, that was only a battle in the Cold War. It took FDR at least six years to get the country to face fascism. The Whigs had to go into history before slavery was confronted.

I don't think either of these two candidates will inspire us to change .. for the better.

 

[Fenton Lum]

The media has no obligation to be neutral. If it did, about 5000 rightwing 'news' sites would disappear from the internet.

Are you married to Candycorn, is she your sister? The media is made up of different parts, and within the media journalist/reporters are different from commentators. Journalist and reporters should have the integrity to report unbiased FACTS, vet sources, and avoid speculation. Media bias applies to those people, not commentators.

If you are indeed married to Candycorn, DONT HAVE KIDS!

It's a for profit business in an economic system we've confused with a twisted version of capitalism. It has one top priority.

But he's right to the extent that different outlets have different consumer groups. It's not monolithic.

Sure, but again, the american public never wants to take any responsibility for anything. If we would merely refuse to respond and/or watch, they would have to change something. But as a whole, we won't alter anything WE do, we just bitch that things won't change.

I fundamentally disagree. The MSM feeds us what we want, not the other way around. America (and the West) faced its greatest challenge since the height of the cold war in the 60s on 9-11. W did change something, but unfortunately not for the better. We've been playing catchup for over 12 years. It's not the first time it's happened. We had eight years of malaise after losing in Vietnam, and despite all the blood and destruction, that was only a battle in the Cold War. It took FDR at least six years to get the country to face fascism. The Whigs had to go into history before slavery was confronted.

I don't think either of these two candidates will inspire us to change .. for the better.

The MSM feeds us what we want, not the other way around.

That's what I meant, they're feeding us what we want and we're takling no responsibility for that. We whine about them feeding us what we want. I was confining that to this media bitchfest.

We do agree on these candidates, both are no good for society, by design, but that's not what the power structure was ever really for, to do the will of the unsubstantial people.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

What would give them that idea?

The American public thinks the media wants Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to win by an almost 10-to-1 margin, according to a new poll.

The Suffolk University/USA Today poll released Friday asks, “Who do you think the media, including major newspapers and TV stations, would like to see elected president: Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump?”

Of the 1,000 adults surveyed, 75.9 percent answered Clinton, while just 7.9 percent picked Trump, the Republican nominee. Just more than 16 percent of respondents chose either “neither” or “undecided.”

The Suffolk University/USA Today poll comes on the heels of an Associated Press/GkF poll last week showing that 56 percent of likely voters, including 87 percent of his supporters, believe the media is biased against Trump.

In that poll, 51 percent of Clinton supporters said the media is biased in her favor, while just 8 percent said it’s biased against her.

Trump has repeatedly complained the media is against him.

Poll: Public overwhelmingly thinks media is in the tank for Clinton

Latest odds in Las Vegas: 75% Clinton will win. http://www.oddsshark.com/entertainment/us-presidential-odds-2016-futures

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Gee, really? Ya don't say..........

A Suffolk University/USA Today poll finds that by an overwhelming margin, Americans believe the media is biased in the favor of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

“Who do you think the media, including major newspapers and TV stations, would like to see elected president, Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump?” asked the poll. A whopping 75% of those polled said the media favored Clinton, while only 7% said they preferred Trump.

Poll: Huge Majority Believe Media Is Biased in Favor of Hillary Clinton

 

[miketx]

Anybody not a liar or a fool can see it.

 

[Hugo Stiglitz]

Considering the way Trump has treated the media, I don't blame them.

 

[TNHarley]

Considering the way Trump has treated the media, I don't blame them.

"how dare he question their legitimacy!"


Says the sheep

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Considering the way Trump has treated the media, I don't blame them.

How Donald John Trump treat the Media does not excuse the the Media for being bias...

Also Kasich could be the GOP candidate and the media would be bias and working to get Hillary Clinton elected...

 

[miketx]

Considering the way Trump has treated the media, I don't blame them.

You mean your upset because he treated them like the liars they are?

 

[RDD_1210]

Serious Question. What are some tangible examples of this bias?

 

[miketx]

Serious Question. What are some tangible examples of this bias?

The pretend liberal seriousness has started.

 

[RDD_1210]

Serious Question. What are some tangible examples of this bias?

The pretend liberal seriousness has started.

Just one example. They're countless so I'm sure you'll have no problems doing it.

 

[Norman]

The media handed her debate question... handed Trump a broken mic, and had biased moderators.

Yet this "experienced" candidate lost to Trump, even with all her cheating. Turns out she is only competent in fraud and corruption.

 

[RDD_1210]

The media handed her debate question... handed Trump a broken mic, and had biased moderators.

Yet this "experienced" candidate lost to Trump, even with all her cheating. Turns out she is only competent in fraud and corruption.

LOL, broken mic he says. You fucking turnips will believe literally anything.