11 Democrat states have formed a pact to sabotage the Electoral College

They may run into an issue with "one person one vote" that is the law of the land via the 14th amendment (which remember only applies to the States, not the feds) if the majorities wishes in the State are ignored and all the EC votes go to the person who "lost" the Statewide vote.
The Electoral College violates one man one vote

Votes in smaller states have more electoral clout than in populated states


What rule is that in the United states?


We are not a democracy , if we were gays would not be able to get married .
A majority of Americans support gay marriage
Welcome to the 21st century

They didn't though. The gay marriage prop was voted out by the people and put into place by activist judges. Lol.
Get with the times

That vote was eight years before states started to grant gay marriages and people saw the world didn’t end

Nobody but social conservatives cares anymore

The point here is that you are giving out misinformation or "faux news." So, if it was the popular vote that counted, then gay marriage would have never been legal to begin with. Why don't you liberals think about things beyond the tip of your own noses?
 
The Democrats lose one election because of the Electoral College, so like the mind-numbed robots they are, they wage war against the Electoral College system. It never occurs to them that it could easily have gone the other way.
States can decide how they allocate their votes

They may run into an issue with "one person one vote" that is the law of the land via the 14th amendment (which remember only applies to the States, not the feds) if the majorities wishes in the State are ignored and all the EC votes go to the person who "lost" the Statewide vote.
The Electoral College violates one man one vote

Votes in smaller states have more electoral clout than in populated states


What rule is that in the United states?


We are not a democracy , if we were gays would not be able to get married .
A majority of Americans support gay marriage
Welcome to the 21st century


They voted against it you idiot
 
They may run into an issue with "one person one vote" that is the law of the land via the 14th amendment (which remember only applies to the States, not the feds) if the majorities wishes in the State are ignored and all the EC votes go to the person who "lost" the Statewide vote.
The Electoral College violates one man one vote

Votes in smaller states have more electoral clout than in populated states


What rule is that in the United states?


We are not a democracy , if we were gays would not be able to get married .
A majority of Americans support gay marriage
Welcome to the 21st century

They didn't though. The gay marriage prop was voted out by the people and put into place by activist judges. Lol.
Get with the times

That vote was eight years before states started to grant gay marriages and people saw the world didn’t end

Nobody but social conservatives cares anymore


Because the supreme court overruled the people's vote .. again we are not a democracy
 
The Electoral College violates one man one vote

Votes in smaller states have more electoral clout than in populated states


What rule is that in the United states?


We are not a democracy , if we were gays would not be able to get married .
A majority of Americans support gay marriage
Welcome to the 21st century

They didn't though. The gay marriage prop was voted out by the people and put into place by activist judges. Lol.
Get with the times

That vote was eight years before states started to grant gay marriages and people saw the world didn’t end

Nobody but social conservatives cares anymore

The point here is that you are giving out misinformation or "faux news." So, if it was the popular vote that counted, then gay marriage would have never been legal to begin with. Why don't you liberals think about things beyond the tip of your own noses?

Actually you lost on both counts

Our society has passed you by
 
The Electoral College violates one man one vote

Votes in smaller states have more electoral clout than in populated states


What rule is that in the United states?


We are not a democracy , if we were gays would not be able to get married .
A majority of Americans support gay marriage
Welcome to the 21st century

They didn't though. The gay marriage prop was voted out by the people and put into place by activist judges. Lol.
Get with the times

That vote was eight years before states started to grant gay marriages and people saw the world didn’t end

Nobody but social conservatives cares anymore


Because the supreme court overruled the people's vote .. again we are not a democracy

The Supreme Court followed the Constitution

A no brainer
 
States can decide how they allocate their votes

They may run into an issue with "one person one vote" that is the law of the land via the 14th amendment (which remember only applies to the States, not the feds) if the majorities wishes in the State are ignored and all the EC votes go to the person who "lost" the Statewide vote.
The Electoral College violates one man one vote

Votes in smaller states have more electoral clout than in populated states


What rule is that in the United states?


We are not a democracy , if we were gays would not be able to get married .
A majority of Americans support gay marriage
Welcome to the 21st century


They voted against it you idiot

Who?

I didn’t get to vote
 
What rule is that in the United states?


We are not a democracy , if we were gays would not be able to get married .
A majority of Americans support gay marriage
Welcome to the 21st century

They didn't though. The gay marriage prop was voted out by the people and put into place by activist judges. Lol.
Get with the times

That vote was eight years before states started to grant gay marriages and people saw the world didn’t end

Nobody but social conservatives cares anymore


Because the supreme court overruled the people's vote .. again we are not a democracy

The Supreme Court followed the Constitution

A no brainer


And that's why their is no such thing as one vote , one person ..


We are not a democracy
 
They may run into an issue with "one person one vote" that is the law of the land via the 14th amendment (which remember only applies to the States, not the feds) if the majorities wishes in the State are ignored and all the EC votes go to the person who "lost" the Statewide vote.
The Electoral College violates one man one vote

Votes in smaller states have more electoral clout than in populated states


What rule is that in the United states?


We are not a democracy , if we were gays would not be able to get married .
A majority of Americans support gay marriage
Welcome to the 21st century


They voted against it you idiot

Who?

I didn’t get to vote


If you cant win in California , how are you going to win the gay vote anywhere else ?
 
What rule is that in the United states?


We are not a democracy , if we were gays would not be able to get married .
A majority of Americans support gay marriage
Welcome to the 21st century

They didn't though. The gay marriage prop was voted out by the people and put into place by activist judges. Lol.
Get with the times

That vote was eight years before states started to grant gay marriages and people saw the world didn’t end

Nobody but social conservatives cares anymore

The point here is that you are giving out misinformation or "faux news." So, if it was the popular vote that counted, then gay marriage would have never been legal to begin with. Why don't you liberals think about things beyond the tip of your own noses?

Actually you lost on both counts

Our society has passed you by

Your reply makes no sense in context to what we are discussing. I am just stating the facts here. If it weren't for liberal activist judges, gay marriage would have never been legalized because the people voted against it on the Prop vote. There you go. Still want just the popular vote to count?
 
Connecticut To Give Its Electoral College Votes To National Popular Vote Victor

Connecticut voted to give its Electoral College Votes to the national popular vote victor. The state Senate voted 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73. California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia have already signed the accord.

This might give the Corrupt Democratic Party permanent control.
With permanent control the Corrupt Democrats will be able ignore the laws and the constitution and nobody could stop them. What do you think will happen to America if the Democrats are undefeatable?


This is absolutely awesome for REPUBLICANS! In state wide vote the GOP has no chance in CA, HI, IL, MA, NJ, NY, MY, RI, VT, WA or DC. So if the GOP candidate wins the popular vote he wins all these blue states. If he loses the popular vote, then he would have lost these states anyways, but still can win the electoral votes! Nice Dumbcrats


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 
Let's face it. The leftists change their story from day to day, depending on what will benefit them on that particular day. Lol. Once they LOSE an election based on the popular vote, they will suddenly see the value in having an electoral college. :D We see this exemplified here on the site daily.
 
Connecticut To Give Its Electoral College Votes To National Popular Vote Victor

Connecticut voted to give its Electoral College Votes to the national popular vote victor. The state Senate voted 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73. California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia have already signed the accord.

This might give the Corrupt Democratic Party permanent control.
With permanent control the Corrupt Democrats will be able ignore the laws and the constitution and nobody could stop them. What do you think will happen to America if the Democrats are undefeatable?

The electoral college should be sabotaged. It allows the minority to rule and gives us presidents like Trump and Bush.

And Clinton and others too. The electoral college process has already been explained. It is to give as much clout to small states as big ones. Otherwise, only bigger states will be deciding elections and smaller states would have no say at all. This is not difficult to understand.

Bigger states should decide elections, you totalitarian moron.
 
EVERY state, no matter how big or small, is entitled to equal representation within the federal government, hence the electoral college.

The electoral college doesn't give equal representation. It gives more voting power to smaller states, and it weakens the voting power of larger states. That is undemocratic.
 
Connecticut To Give Its Electoral College Votes To National Popular Vote Victor

Connecticut voted to give its Electoral College Votes to the national popular vote victor. The state Senate voted 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73. California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia have already signed the accord.

This might give the Corrupt Democratic Party permanent control.
With permanent control the Corrupt Democrats will be able ignore the laws and the constitution and nobody could stop them. What do you think will happen to America if the Democrats are undefeatable?

The electoral college should be sabotaged. It allows the minority to rule and gives us presidents like Trump and Bush.

And Clinton and others too. The electoral college process has already been explained. It is to give as much clout to small states as big ones. Otherwise, only bigger states will be deciding elections and smaller states would have no say at all. This is not difficult to understand.

Bigger states should decide elections, you totalitarian moron.

:1041: You make this statement and end it with calling ME a totalitarian? :D Then bigger states leadership have all the control and smaller states have none. They are not being adequately represented within the federal government.
 
EVERY state, no matter how big or small, is entitled to equal representation within the federal government, hence the electoral college.

The electoral college doesn't give equal representation. It gives more voting power to smaller states, and it weakens the voting power of larger states. That is undemocratic.

No it does not. It gives an equal amount of electoral votes to each state, therefore making the election more fair and every state participating in the election is counted.
 
It doesn't matter if YOU don't like the way some states votes turn out. That is only fair that each state gets equal representation when it comes to voting matters within the federal government. They are ALL a part of the Union.
 
Connecticut To Give Its Electoral College Votes To National Popular Vote Victor

Connecticut voted to give its Electoral College Votes to the national popular vote victor. The state Senate voted 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73. California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia have already signed the accord.

This might give the Corrupt Democratic Party permanent control.
With permanent control the Corrupt Democrats will be able ignore the laws and the constitution and nobody could stop them. What do you think will happen to America if the Democrats are undefeatable?

Bet that lasts through exactly one election.
 
If they are dem states does it really change anything.....wouldn't the dem alrdy have won all of em

True, but with the Democratic Party's mass voter fraud they could flip a few states. The other possibility is that it could backfire on them. They could be screwing over their own voters. There might be some big legal battles with this one.

Oh, it's gonna backfire on them, one way or another. Either a) they're gonna end up having to give their Electoral votes to a Republican, and all hell will break loose, or b) one of those states is gonna give their Electoral votes to someone who would not have gotten them under the previous laws, and their own residents are going to go ballistic.

And that's completely aside from the Constitutional questions this is going to trigger.
 
Connecticut To Give Its Electoral College Votes To National Popular Vote Victor

Connecticut voted to give its Electoral College Votes to the national popular vote victor. The state Senate voted 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73. California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia have already signed the accord.

This might give the Corrupt Democratic Party permanent control.
With permanent control the Corrupt Democrats will be able ignore the laws and the constitution and nobody could stop them. What do you think will happen to America if the Democrats are undefeatable?


Question:

Why don't RWNJs believe that their vote should be counted?

Hmmm ?

Question: Why don't left-wing nutbags think their states have any validity as legal and political entities?
 
EVERY state, no matter how big or small, is entitled to equal representation within the federal government, hence the electoral college.

The electoral college doesn't give equal representation. It gives more voting power to smaller states, and it weakens the voting power of larger states. That is undemocratic.

So you're taking the stance that the US House of Representatives is "undemocratic"?

This, of course, is leaving aside the fact that we're not a pure democracy, never have been, and were never intended to be.
 

Forum List

Back
Top