11 Million Tax Payers Lose $323 Billion In Deductions In Trump Tax Hit

[Ray From Cleveland]

I think I'm paying more, but, with the new tax laws, I expected to.....gladly.

Yea well...I'm paying more to...as are millions of others...most not so "gladly"

Why would anyone be glad to tun their money over to the rich anyway?

You do that several times a week without the tax cuts whether you realize it or not. But you don’t complain then.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

 

[danielpalos]

lol. tax cut economics is worse.

Tax cuts put money in the hands of the people that earned the money instead of the filthy welfare queens that elected the corrupt politicians to steal it for them.

That is a good thing. You stupid Moon Bats wouldn't understand.

Then in 2025, the individual tax relief in the Republican tax bill expires altogether. This is due to a Senate budget rule that restricts the cost of the tax bill to $1.5 trillion. Republicans decided to sunset nearly all the individual tax cuts in order to make the corporate tax cuts permanent.

The result will be a tax increase in 2027 for more than half of all Americans — 53 percent, according to an analysis from the Tax Policy Center.

/---/ The Senate needed a super majority to make the tax cuts permanent - they only had 51. But you already knew that.
Republicans Explain Why They Want Permanent Tax Cuts For Corporations But Not People | HuffPost
The last-minute change, unveiled by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) Tuesday night, was made to comply with Senate rules that forbid certain legislation from adding to the federal budget deficit after 10 years. Those rules, dictated by a process known as reconciliation, would allow Republicans to pass their bill with a simple majority instead of with 60 votes.

In short, Republicans were forced to alter the bill in order to more easily pass their tax cuts. In doing so, however, they weakened the talking point that the plan would primarily benefit the middle class.

only in right wing fantasy can you pead so specially, you can ignore this capital but fundamental based metric:
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Tax Cut Economics are Worthless if they don't balance the budget.

/---/ How many times will you libtards post that meaningless clock? If you really want to eliminate the debt then tell your democRATs in Washington to CUT spending and stop proposing more unfunded spending. You won't because deep down inside you want the debt and like the excessive spending.

fundamentals matter under Capitalism. only the right wing, doesn't care.

 

[danielpalos]

Tax cuts put money in the hands of the people that earned the money instead of the filthy welfare queens that elected the corrupt politicians to steal it for them.

That is a good thing. You stupid Moon Bats wouldn't understand.

Wealthy Republicans really HATE the middle class and poor...don't they..

We hate welfare queens and Illegals. You know, the core of the filthy Democrat Party voting block.

You filthy ass Moon Bats live them because without them the Democrat Party would be nothing.

just admit it; y'all really Hate Capitalism if the Poor may benefit.

True socialists on a national basis, one and all.

Capitalism creates wealth and jobs. Socialism creates equal poverty for all except the Socialist ruling elite.

Why so much public sector spending?

 

[Lesh]

lol. tax cut economics is worse.

Tax cuts put money in the hands of the people that earned the money instead of the filthy welfare queens that elected the corrupt politicians to steal it for them.

That is a good thing. You stupid Moon Bats wouldn't understand.

Then in 2025, the individual tax relief in the Republican tax bill expires altogether. This is due to a Senate budget rule that restricts the cost of the tax bill to $1.5 trillion. Republicans decided to sunset nearly all the individual tax cuts in order to make the corporate tax cuts permanent.

The result will be a tax increase in 2027 for more than half of all Americans — 53 percent, according to an analysis from the Tax Policy Center.

/---/ The Senate needed a super majority to make the tax cuts permanent - they only had 51. But you already knew that.
Republicans Explain Why They Want Permanent Tax Cuts For Corporations But Not People | HuffPost
The last-minute change, unveiled by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) Tuesday night, was made to comply with Senate rules that forbid certain legislation from adding to the federal budget deficit after 10 years. Those rules, dictated by a process known as reconciliation, would allow Republicans to pass their bill with a simple majority instead of with 60 votes.

In short, Republicans were forced to alter the bill in order to more easily pass their tax cuts. In doing so, however, they weakened the talking point that the plan would primarily benefit the middle class.

only in right wing fantasy can you pead so specially, you can ignore this capital but fundamental based metric:
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Tax Cut Economics are Worthless if they don't balance the budget.

/---/ How many times will you libtards post that meaningless clock? If you really want to eliminate the debt then tell your democRATs in Washington to CUT spending and stop proposing more unfunded spending. You won't because deep down inside you want the debt and like the excessive spending.

Because the only “acceptable” cuts are to programs that help the middle class and poor?

Oh...

 

[Meister]

Tax cuts put money in the hands of the people that earned the money instead of the filthy welfare queens that elected the corrupt politicians to steal it for them.

That is a good thing. You stupid Moon Bats wouldn't understand.

Then in 2025, the individual tax relief in the Republican tax bill expires altogether. This is due to a Senate budget rule that restricts the cost of the tax bill to $1.5 trillion. Republicans decided to sunset nearly all the individual tax cuts in order to make the corporate tax cuts permanent.

The result will be a tax increase in 2027 for more than half of all Americans — 53 percent, according to an analysis from the Tax Policy Center.

/---/ The Senate needed a super majority to make the tax cuts permanent - they only had 51. But you already knew that.
Republicans Explain Why They Want Permanent Tax Cuts For Corporations But Not People | HuffPost
The last-minute change, unveiled by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) Tuesday night, was made to comply with Senate rules that forbid certain legislation from adding to the federal budget deficit after 10 years. Those rules, dictated by a process known as reconciliation, would allow Republicans to pass their bill with a simple majority instead of with 60 votes.

In short, Republicans were forced to alter the bill in order to more easily pass their tax cuts. In doing so, however, they weakened the talking point that the plan would primarily benefit the middle class.

only in right wing fantasy can you pead so specially, you can ignore this capital but fundamental based metric:
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Tax Cut Economics are Worthless if they don't balance the budget.

/---/ How many times will you libtards post that meaningless clock? If you really want to eliminate the debt then tell your democRATs in Washington to CUT spending and stop proposing more unfunded spending. You won't because deep down inside you want the debt and like the excessive spending.

Because the only “acceptable” cuts are to programs that help the middle class and poor?

Oh...

You forgot illegals, Lesh.

 

[Lesh]

I think I'm paying more, but, with the new tax laws, I expected to.....gladly.

Yea well...I'm paying more to...as are millions of others...most not so "gladly"

Why would anyone be glad to tun their money over to the rich anyway?

You do that several times a week without the tax cuts whether you realize it or not. But you don’t complain then.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

So you want to give the rich MORE of your money?

Oh...

 

[danielpalos]

Then in 2025, the individual tax relief in the Republican tax bill expires altogether. This is due to a Senate budget rule that restricts the cost of the tax bill to $1.5 trillion. Republicans decided to sunset nearly all the individual tax cuts in order to make the corporate tax cuts permanent.

The result will be a tax increase in 2027 for more than half of all Americans — 53 percent, according to an analysis from the Tax Policy Center.

/---/ The Senate needed a super majority to make the tax cuts permanent - they only had 51. But you already knew that.
Republicans Explain Why They Want Permanent Tax Cuts For Corporations But Not People | HuffPost
The last-minute change, unveiled by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) Tuesday night, was made to comply with Senate rules that forbid certain legislation from adding to the federal budget deficit after 10 years. Those rules, dictated by a process known as reconciliation, would allow Republicans to pass their bill with a simple majority instead of with 60 votes.

In short, Republicans were forced to alter the bill in order to more easily pass their tax cuts. In doing so, however, they weakened the talking point that the plan would primarily benefit the middle class.

only in right wing fantasy can you pead so specially, you can ignore this capital but fundamental based metric:
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Tax Cut Economics are Worthless if they don't balance the budget.

/---/ How many times will you libtards post that meaningless clock? If you really want to eliminate the debt then tell your democRATs in Washington to CUT spending and stop proposing more unfunded spending. You won't because deep down inside you want the debt and like the excessive spending.

Because the only “acceptable” cuts are to programs that help the middle class and poor?

Oh...

You forgot illegals, Lesh.

You forgot an immigration Clause, right wingers.

 

[Meister]

I think I'm paying more, but, with the new tax laws, I expected to.....gladly.

Yea well...I'm paying more to...as are millions of others...most not so "gladly"

Why would anyone be glad to tun their money over to the rich anyway?

You do that several times a week without the tax cuts whether you realize it or not. But you don’t complain then.


Sent from my iPad using USMessageBoard.com

So you want to give the rich MORE of your money?

Oh...

Wealth envy, much?

I don't care diddly about the rich, they pay plenty into taxes.
I take care of myself.
The government could take away every last dime from the rich, and it wouldn't make
a ripple in my life. I wouldn't gain a penny....and neither would you.

 

[Meister]

/---/ The Senate needed a super majority to make the tax cuts permanent - they only had 51. But you already knew that.
Republicans Explain Why They Want Permanent Tax Cuts For Corporations But Not People | HuffPost
The last-minute change, unveiled by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) Tuesday night, was made to comply with Senate rules that forbid certain legislation from adding to the federal budget deficit after 10 years. Those rules, dictated by a process known as reconciliation, would allow Republicans to pass their bill with a simple majority instead of with 60 votes.

In short, Republicans were forced to alter the bill in order to more easily pass their tax cuts. In doing so, however, they weakened the talking point that the plan would primarily benefit the middle class.

only in right wing fantasy can you pead so specially, you can ignore this capital but fundamental based metric:
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Tax Cut Economics are Worthless if they don't balance the budget.

/---/ How many times will you libtards post that meaningless clock? If you really want to eliminate the debt then tell your democRATs in Washington to CUT spending and stop proposing more unfunded spending. You won't because deep down inside you want the debt and like the excessive spending.

Because the only “acceptable” cuts are to programs that help the middle class and poor?

Oh...

You forgot illegals, Lesh.

You forgot an immigration Clause, right wingers.

Do you for one second understand the difference between ILLEGAL and LEGAL immigration?
Obviously not, now run back to your playpen.

 

[Flash]

American consumers indirectly pays every cent of that trillion a year that is collected by the filthy Federal government in corporate taxes.

These Moon Bats are simply too stupid to understand that. Economics is not their strong suit.

lol. tax cut economics is worse.

Tax cuts put money in the hands of the people that earned the money instead of the filthy welfare queens that elected the corrupt politicians to steal it for them.

That is a good thing. You stupid Moon Bats wouldn't understand.

Then in 2025, the individual tax relief in the Republican tax bill expires altogether. This is due to a Senate budget rule that restricts the cost of the tax bill to $1.5 trillion. Republicans decided to sunset nearly all the individual tax cuts in order to make the corporate tax cuts permanent.

The result will be a tax increase in 2027 for more than half of all Americans — 53 percent, according to an analysis from the Tax Policy Center.

/---/ The Senate needed a super majority to make the tax cuts permanent - they only had 51. But you already knew that.
Republicans Explain Why They Want Permanent Tax Cuts For Corporations But Not People | HuffPost
The last-minute change, unveiled by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) Tuesday night, was made to comply with Senate rules that forbid certain legislation from adding to the federal budget deficit after 10 years. Those rules, dictated by a process known as reconciliation, would allow Republicans to pass their bill with a simple majority instead of with 60 votes.

In short, Republicans were forced to alter the bill in order to more easily pass their tax cuts. In doing so, however, they weakened the talking point that the plan would primarily benefit the middle class.

only in right wing fantasy can you pead so specially, you can ignore this capital but fundamental based metric:
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Tax Cut Economics are Worthless if they don't balance the budget.

You dumb Moon Bat.

That worthless asshole Obama ran up $10 trillion in debt and had higher taxes!

 

[danielpalos]

only in right wing fantasy can you pead so specially, you can ignore this capital but fundamental based metric:
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Tax Cut Economics are Worthless if they don't balance the budget.

/---/ How many times will you libtards post that meaningless clock? If you really want to eliminate the debt then tell your democRATs in Washington to CUT spending and stop proposing more unfunded spending. You won't because deep down inside you want the debt and like the excessive spending.

Because the only “acceptable” cuts are to programs that help the middle class and poor?

Oh...

You forgot illegals, Lesh.

You forgot an immigration Clause, right wingers.

Do you for one second understand the difference between ILLEGAL and LEGAL immigration?
Obviously not, now run back to your playpen.

Our Constitution is Express not Implied, if we have to quibble. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. tax cut economics is worse.

Tax cuts put money in the hands of the people that earned the money instead of the filthy welfare queens that elected the corrupt politicians to steal it for them.

That is a good thing. You stupid Moon Bats wouldn't understand.

Then in 2025, the individual tax relief in the Republican tax bill expires altogether. This is due to a Senate budget rule that restricts the cost of the tax bill to $1.5 trillion. Republicans decided to sunset nearly all the individual tax cuts in order to make the corporate tax cuts permanent.

The result will be a tax increase in 2027 for more than half of all Americans — 53 percent, according to an analysis from the Tax Policy Center.

/---/ The Senate needed a super majority to make the tax cuts permanent - they only had 51. But you already knew that.
Republicans Explain Why They Want Permanent Tax Cuts For Corporations But Not People | HuffPost
The last-minute change, unveiled by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) Tuesday night, was made to comply with Senate rules that forbid certain legislation from adding to the federal budget deficit after 10 years. Those rules, dictated by a process known as reconciliation, would allow Republicans to pass their bill with a simple majority instead of with 60 votes.

In short, Republicans were forced to alter the bill in order to more easily pass their tax cuts. In doing so, however, they weakened the talking point that the plan would primarily benefit the middle class.

only in right wing fantasy can you pead so specially, you can ignore this capital but fundamental based metric:
U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time
Tax Cut Economics are Worthless if they don't balance the budget.

You dumb Moon Bat.

That worthless asshole Obama ran up $10 trillion in debt and had higher taxes!

barely felt that recession? thank Goodness for the social economic shock absorbers.

 

[Lesh]

Wealth envy, much?

I don't care diddly about the rich, they pay plenty into taxes.
I take care of myself.
The government could take away every last dime from the rich, and it wouldn't make
a ripple in my life. I wouldn't gain a penny....and neither would you.

Nope. No wealth envy.

I just don't want to give rich fucks MY money...you seem fine with it...as well as adding a couple trillion to the debt while doing it

 

[Lesh]

/---/ How many times will you libtards post that meaningless clock? If you really want to eliminate the debt then tell your democRATs in Washington to CUT spending and stop proposing more unfunded spending. You won't because deep down inside you want the debt and like the excessive spending.

Because the only “acceptable” cuts are to programs that help the middle class and poor?

Oh...

You forgot illegals, Lesh.

You forgot an immigration Clause, right wingers.

Do you for one second understand the difference between ILLEGAL and LEGAL immigration?
Obviously not, now run back to your playpen.

Our Constitution is Express not Implied, if we have to quibble. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Jesus dude...what a troll

 

[danielpalos]

Because the only “acceptable” cuts are to programs that help the middle class and poor?

Oh...

You forgot illegals, Lesh.

You forgot an immigration Clause, right wingers.

Do you for one second understand the difference between ILLEGAL and LEGAL immigration?
Obviously not, now run back to your playpen.

Our Constitution is Express not Implied, if we have to quibble. There is no immigration clause in our federal Constitution.

Jesus dude...what a troll

projection is what the right wing does best. thank Goodness for our First Amendment.

 

[Meister]

Wealth envy, much?

I don't care diddly about the rich, they pay plenty into taxes.
I take care of myself.
The government could take away every last dime from the rich, and it wouldn't make
a ripple in my life. I wouldn't gain a penny....and neither would you.

Nope. No wealth envy.

I just don't want to give rich fucks MY money...you seem fine with it...as well as adding a couple trillion to the debt while doing it

I don't blame the rich for the debt, I blame our congress for that.

 

[Lesh]

Well the rich are behind this GOP tax cut

 

[Cellblock2429]

Well the rich are behind this GOP tax cut

/----/ You idiot.

 

[Lesh]

Well the rich are behind this GOP tax cut

/----/ You idiot.

Thanks for that useless post

 

[Lesh]

I don't blame the rich for the debt, I blame our congress for that.

That would be the REPUBLICAN Congress...but we'll pretend it's "both sides" right?