BULLSHIT!!!Bill Clinton did that, too. So did Hillary.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BULLSHIT!!!Bill Clinton did that, too. So did Hillary.
No accounts with Joe Biden as signatory has been producedJust check his bank account...
None reveal any criminality on Joe Biden, nor Hunter, for that matter.or watch the videos that have been available for a while now.
What FBI informants? FBI is not hiding documents. Documents pertaining to investigations are historically not revealed for the protection of innocent persons named in the documents, which guys like Trump will exploit, give to his followers who, in turn, will threaten, etc.or talk to the FBI informants or look at the documents the FBI is hiding.
Skewey you aren't very bright.
They cooperated with the Gov't Trump obstructed the Govt's efforts to retrieve them.Bill Clinton did that, too. So did Hillary.
Rumpole's roomie?Skews is a democrat operative sent here to spread lies and propaganda.
These IRS whistle blowers are disputing your angle, guy.If David Weiss, after 5 years, couldn't find more than a misdemeanor, it's doubtful you are doing better.
Got audio?These IRS whistle blowers are disputing your angle, guy.
I guess I missed the FBI Directors' comments that support your theory that Congressmen Comer and Grassly are lying to the American people and just made up a story about what was contained in the 1023 document. Since you are on top of this, can you post that for us Skew? ThanksHere’s a hot tip for anyone trying to peddle a lie: Add a number. Don’t make it too big, or too vague, like “millions.” If you’re talking about stealing an election, 450,000might work. Or 33,000. Or maybe 5,000. But really, all those numbers are a little suspiciously neat. To really make this thing work, the number has to be something solid. Something specific.
Like 17. Now there’s a number.
If you’ve seen that number in the news this week, it’s probably been as part of the latest “scandal” that Republicans have whipped up about President Joe Biden. If you haven’t seen it, count yourself lucky, but don’t think it’s going to last. Because Republicans, led by pidgin expert Sen. Chuck Grassley and whistleblower-hatingRep. James Comer, are claiming that there are “17 tapes” that document their claims of a bribery scandal connected to Biden and his son Hunter.
Have they heard these 17 tapes? No. Have they heard maybe 10 of the tapes? No. How many tapes have they heard? Zero. They’ve heard zero tapes. Because the whole thing is just another part of the extended fantasy tale that Rudy Giuliani brought to them years ago. Like the missing whistleblower and the fake “FBI document,” Republicans know this is all a lie. They just don’t care.
The make-believe scandal that Republicans are now pretending to investigate goes back to May 1, 2019. That’s when Rudy Giulani brought a tale of intrigue, bribery, and blackmail to The New York Times, without any evidence, and the Times did what it does when Guilani brings them anything: They ran it without question.
The claim from the start was based around the fact that while Joe Biden had been vice president, his son Hunter had been on the board of a Ukrainian energy firm called Burisma. In March 2016, Biden pressured Ukraine to fire a prosecutor named Viktor Shokin, heavily hinting that U.S. aid might be withheld if Shokin wasn’t dropped. From this, Giuliani spun a story that Shokin had been investigating Burisma and Biden had him fired to protect his son’s paycheck.
It took less than a week for Bloomberg News to do what The New York Times had skipped over in their efforts to act as a Giuliani transcription service. Bloomberg sent reporters to Ukraine, interviewed officials, checked with Giuliani’s supposed sources, and looked back at the very well documented, very public events. They immediately showed that everything Giuliani was claiming was nonsense.
The reason that Biden put pressure on Ukraine over Shokin was because he was refusing to investigate Burisma. And not just Burisma. Shokin was such a corrupt prosecutor that he was allowing oligarchs to do as they pleased, so long as they shared a little of their profits. It was actually a probe by the U.K.’s Serious Fraud Office that opened the door on how corrupt Shokin was, and how his failure to investigate was turning Ukraine into a hotspot for international criminals. Getting rid of Shokin was a critical step in the fight against corruption in Ukraine.
Shokin himself has even confirmed that he was never investigating Burisma, which is all the testimony that’s needed to show that the whole thing is a farce. The truth is that Biden completely ignored how his actions might damage his son’s income in order to do the right thing in stopping corruption. And, no matter what Giuliani, Trump, or innumerable Republicans have said since then, there is not, was not, has not been, any evidence of wrongdoing by either Joe Biden or Hunter Biden in Ukraine.
But just because a crime doesn’t exist has never stopped Republicans from continuing to “investigate.” Since Republicans gained control of the House, that has meant Rep. James Comer cornponing his way across right-wing media repeating claims he knows are not true. Because truth has f*** all to do with it.
'17 tapes’ are latest attempt by Republicans to smear Biden
Here’s a hot tip for anyone trying to peddle a lie: Add a number. Don’t make it too big, or too vague, like “millions.” If you’re talking about stealing an election, 450,000 might work. Or 33,000. Or maybe 5,000. But really, all those numbers are a...www.dailykos.com
Here’s a number for you. 18
That’s how many months are left before the Democrats take back the House.
Released transcripts, six more IRS people are to testify in the next couple weeks.....all corroborating Weiss had shackles on.Got audio?
IOW, so far you have nothing. That will not change.Released transcripts, six more IRS people are to testify in the next couple weeks.....all corroborating Weiss had shackles on.
These aren't the same 17 tapes Grassley asked the deputy assistant FBI director about, under oath, if the FBI had them, to which the man replied he didn't want to talk about it?Have they heard these 17 tapes?
It's not my investigation......BTW......you're probably right, must be the reason Biden is getting very testy when asked about it.....must be why ABC,CBS and NBC have been covering it, reminds one of that song about 'It's all coming back to me now'.IOW, so far you have nothing. That will not change.
Leakers are almost exclusive to the left.You would think by now some kind of proof of the existence of the tapes would have been released the Republicans.
Leakers are almost exclusive to the left.
Reality. Also near exclusive to one side...An interesting observation. By what metric do you base this on?