17 year old Dindu burgler shot dead by homeowner

If more people would arm themselves and shoot the home invaders dead, we would have far less problems with such things because the criminals would really consider whether breaking into a home was worth their life.
Their lives are worth far more than you shit. You just don't know that.

And, what if he wasn't 17, but instead was 15, or 13, or 11? Still okay to just shoot them, on sight?

Let's use your "logic", why not just shoot people who speed, or jaywalk? That would solve those problems in a hurry right?
 
Another John Wayne wannabe, who was at no risk. Essentially, murder...

The 54-year-old woman told police her surveillance system alerted her to the break-in of her home. She said she rushed home and found the teen climbing out of a window.

“She observed a subject leaving the home through the rear,” said police Det. Dan Ferrin.


Miami-Dade police said there was a confrontation and shots were fired. Police said they were on scene seconds after the shooting and gave CPR to the teen. Johnson was rushed to the hospital where he was pronounced dead.

“What’s wrong with her,” asked Johnson’s sister Nisha Johnson. “She did not have to shoot him.”
I have no sympathy for any piece of shit criminal
even someone you care about?
No one I care about is a piece of shit criminal
Probably because they haven't been caught yet.
 
Another Saint Trayvon? Essentially what these fools are saying is need creates a right to steal.

There was a confrontation. The pillow lip thug likely thought he could threaten an unarmed middle-aged woman. Wrong. He got just what was coming to him.
If you hadn't used the "pillow lipped" descriptor, I might have agreed with you. But now that you attach a racial element to it...Ugggh you are just a bigot getting his rocks off.
 
How's somebody in the hood going to get money


and that's the attitude across the country.
 
You jump from an aircraft, you risk Parachute failure.

You work as an electrician for a living you risk being electrocuted.

You camp in the mountains in January, you risk frostbite.

You swim in a lake in the middle of July, you risk being snake bit.

**** YOU BREAK into a home, you risk being shot or bit by a dog ****

I don't want to hear the family's comments justifying what the perpetrator did, how intelligent he was, how much he liked school and how he had his life planned out and a bright future ahead of him.

He was breaking into a house.......he could have gotten a job, and then he would have not been killed. He could have earned money.....honestly.

I am curious as to how the states attorney will handle this. Does Florida have a "stand your ground law?" I know they do have the "castle doctrine".


Castle Doctrine from State to State


Shadow 355
 
Priceless



Yo, sound like educated blacks?

"GTP"
b50950d3cb285160fea6706be8f7af9c.jpg
 
White liberals have done a poor job raising their blacks
 
Found this:

On March 23, 2005, The Florida Senate passed SB-436, the "Castle Doctrine" unanimously, by a vote of 39 YEAS to zero NAYS. They know something about this bill.

On April 5, The Florida House passed SB-436, "Castle Doctrine" by a vote of 94 YEAS to 20 NAYS, a margin of better than four to one.

On April 26, Governor Jeb Bush SIGNED SB-436, the "Castle Doctrine" into law (Chapter No. 2005-27) It takes effect on October 1, 2005.

The Florida "Castle Doctrine" law basically does three things:

One: It establishes, in law, the presumption that a criminal who forcibly enters or intrudes into your home or occupied vehicle is there to cause death or great bodily harm, therefore a person may use any manner of force, including deadly force, against that person.

Two: It removes the "duty to retreat" if you are attacked in any place you have a right to be. You no longer have to turn your back on a criminal and try to run when attacked. Instead, you may stand your ground and fight back, meeting force with force, including deadly force, if you reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm to yourself or others. [This is an American right repeatedly recognized in Supreme Court gun cases.]

Three: It provides that persons using force authorized by law shall not be prosecuted for using such force.

It also prohibits criminals and their families from suing victims for injuring or killing the criminals who have attacked them.

In short, it gives rights back to law-abiding people and forces judges and prosecutors who are prone to coddling criminals to instead focus on protecting victims.

~ Florida Castle Doctrine

Update: It appears it's still on the books. From 2015 ~ Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine
 
Last edited:
MMk so basically this - (4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.

Says that if you break into someone's home they can shoot your ass, no questions asked. Since the criminal is already considered by law to have "intent" of "force or violence" the property owner has every right to shoot said person, regardless of if they are "escaping" or not. A property owner may automatically defend their property with deadly force, it seems they are also protected from any civil liability for said action, so the family of this kid is SOL on that angle as well.


I recommend that one doesn't break into others property in Florida. (And fyi that includes homes, cars, businesses, and, yes, even tents.
 
How is that kid gonna fit his stuff? He was all for education, he was funny, he just needed money for stuff, you can't shoot a kid cuz he wants stuff, that ain't right.
 

Forum List

Back
Top