$174,000 for 113 Days Work. Good Gig If You Can Get It.

Wrong on economics and wrong on history.

Let's be serious, you don't actually care about what the truth is for either and save both of our time and effort in getting there.

No, he obviously doesn't care. He's just regurgitating Democrat talking points that he knows to be lies. That's what all libturds do.

Quibbling on a nit, but I actually don't think he "knows" what he's saying are lies. I think he's just repeating them from other Democrats and doesn't really care if they are true or not and doesn't really think about them. They serve his purpose in the discussion for a point, so he repeats the one he heard.

If he regurgitates pap that he doesn't know to be true, that's as good as a lie.
 
Ok ....here is the theory of economics

Want to balance your budget, establish your spending threshold and set taxes accordingly

Reagan insisted on slashing taxes while he escalated spending........tripled our debt

Again, the Dims insisted on spending increases, not Reagan.

Reagan escalated the size of the military and military spending. The size of government grew under Reagan

The military was responsible for only 1/4 of the budget increases. Furthermore, before Reagan, military spending had been declining for over a decade.
 
First explain how you know the field of economics is wrong, then we'll get back to your question.

Ok ....here is the theory of economics

Want to balance your budget, establish your spending threshold and set taxes accordingly

Reagan insisted on slashing taxes while he escalated spending........tripled our debt

Wrong on economics and wrong on history.

Let's be serious, you don't actually care about what the truth is for either and save both of our time and effort in getting there.

Really?

Reagan did not cut the tax rate?
Reagan did not increase spending?
Reagan did not triple the debt?

What economics school did you go to?
 
Ok ....here is the theory of economics

Want to balance your budget, establish your spending threshold and set taxes accordingly

Reagan insisted on slashing taxes while he escalated spending........tripled our debt

Wrong on economics and wrong on history.

Let's be serious, you don't actually care about what the truth is for either and save both of our time and effort in getting there.

Really?

Reagan did not cut the tax rate?
Reagan did not increase spending?
Reagan did not triple the debt?

What economics school did you go to?

You just got done accusing Reagan of increasing taxes. So now you're accusing him of cutting taxes? Which is it?
 
No, he obviously doesn't care. He's just regurgitating Democrat talking points that he knows to be lies. That's what all libturds do.

Quibbling on a nit, but I actually don't think he "knows" what he's saying are lies. I think he's just repeating them from other Democrats and doesn't really care if they are true or not and doesn't really think about them. They serve his purpose in the discussion for a point, so he repeats the one he heard.

If he regurgitates pap that he doesn't know to be true, that's as good as a lie.

No argument, I did say it's a nit...
 
Wrong on economics and wrong on history.

Let's be serious, you don't actually care about what the truth is for either and save both of our time and effort in getting there.

Really?

Reagan did not cut the tax rate?
Reagan did not increase spending?
Reagan did not triple the debt?

What economics school did you go to?

You just got done accusing Reagan of increasing taxes. So now you're accusing him of cutting taxes? Which is it?
Link
 
Ok ....here is the theory of economics

Want to balance your budget, establish your spending threshold and set taxes accordingly

Reagan insisted on slashing taxes while he escalated spending........tripled our debt

Wrong on economics and wrong on history.

Let's be serious, you don't actually care about what the truth is for either and save both of our time and effort in getting there.

Really?

Reagan did not cut the tax rate?
Reagan did not increase spending?
Reagan did not triple the debt?

What economics school did you go to?

Are you aware that the Federal government is not just the President? Unlike Obama, Reagan was not a dictator who changed laws and spent at his whim. He also didn't get to ignore the House being in the hands of the other party as Obama did.

So yeah, you're still solidly in the realm of no grasp of economics or history and we can now add to the fields you know nothing about.
 
Wrong on economics and wrong on history.

Let's be serious, you don't actually care about what the truth is for either and save both of our time and effort in getting there.

Really?

Reagan did not cut the tax rate?
Reagan did not increase spending?
Reagan did not triple the debt?

What economics school did you go to?

You just got done accusing Reagan of increasing taxes. So now you're accusing him of cutting taxes? Which is it?

Whichever is more convenient to his argument at any particular moment
 
Do nothing means Barry's bs can't go anywhere.

Good deal for the Reps.

Bad deal for the Dems.

As for Congress and workday?? What do you expect from anyone being payed with tax dollars? Hope your not expecting a forty hour work week because that will never happen.

These Clowns have one cushy job. All funded by we the taxpayer. Perks they have voted in for themselves.

Nice to vote yourself one good living at everyone elses expence. Don't expect it to change though. It ain't gonna.

I can't understand how conservatives celebrate a Congress that does nothing

They can't pass a budget so we get stuck with sequestration
Unemployment is at 7% and Congress will not do anything
We have 12 million illegals and Congress does nothing

How do conservatives celebrate gridlock?

Look everyone....look what WE did

The House passed a budget every year. They even caved on the sequestor and got the Senate to agree to a budget this year.
 
Reagan escalated the size of the military and military spending. The size of government grew under Reagan

The military was responsible for only 1/4 of the budget increases. Furthermore, before Reagan, military spending had been declining for over a decade.

VietNam ended in the previous decade

Did you miss that?


We were out of Vietnam by 1973, but military spending started declining long before that.
 
The Boehner's "do nothing" Congress isn't planning on any flurry of activities soon.

Congress Working Less Than 1/3 Of Year In 2014, Getting Full Salary

Just when you thought they couldn't get any do nothinger...

Talk about "inequality" huh? The servicemen laying down their lives for our country and those idiots in congress not doing a damn thing, all dressed up, riding in limos and getting $174,000 a year while the solidiers get way less than half that! THAT's "inequality"!! JFK gave HIS salary to charity. Imagine our current guy doing that?

JFK was a billionaire

JFK had a net worth of about $100 million when he died. That is not even close to being a billionaire.
 
Not really

They didn't accomplish anything on their own agenda. Taxes went up. Obamacare is still the law of the land. Gay rights are advancing, DOMA was repealed. Shutdown blew up in their face

What did they gain? Nothing

thats right, because they only had the votes to stop future damage. not reverse the 5 previous years of damage caused by the obama administration. imagint the hole we'd be in if liberal jokers had a full 8 years to run wild

Republicans brag about being the party of no

In the mean time they are accomplishing none of their agenda. They would have more to show if they actually compromised and received something in return for their support

They would have gotten a better healthcare bill, a budget that supports their programs, more tax concessions

But conservatives hate win-win solutions

Anything that allows the other guy to win also cannot be tolerated. Better everyone loses than both sides win

Just like the President :afro: said "They can't take 'yes' for an answer". Today's Repub party :thup:
 
For the record republicans didn't whine about the democrat majority win half way into Bush's 2nd term but Americans should have been concerned about the capacity of the democrat party to ruin the economy in order to win an election. It seems that the black bag dirty trick democrats planned the biggest damned October surprise of all time to coincide with the presidential elections. Sodomite democrat Barney Frank took over the important "House Banking Committee" that had responsibility for Fannie Mae and told Americans that Fannie Mae was solvent while it was in desperate trouble. The mainstream media didn't seem concerned enough to question the sodomite after Fannie Mae collapsed and they pretended that Bush made it happen. The low information duh--duh left naturally blamed anybody but democrats.
 
The Boehner's "do nothing" Congress isn't planning on any flurry of activities soon.

Congress Working Less Than 1/3 Of Year In 2014, Getting Full Salary

Just when you thought they couldn't get any do nothinger...

Gee, and Obama gets a $400,000 taxpayer funded salary himself. Imagine all the hard work he's done in the past 14 days.

Imagine TWO weeks vacation! :eek:

Imagine, 180 holes of golf to boot!

:eusa_shhh:
 
How much of the year is congress usually in session?

Not enough.

It's in session way too much. Being a Congressman or Senator used to be a part time job. The last thing this country needs is professional politicians working 250 days a year.

AMEN put them back to no pay and coming in on there own buck no more than 4 times a year...Should do the same with many government positions...Start having the horses pulling the cart .
 
Wrong on economics and wrong on history.

Let's be serious, you don't actually care about what the truth is for either and save both of our time and effort in getting there.

Really?

Reagan did not cut the tax rate?
Reagan did not increase spending?
Reagan did not triple the debt?

What economics school did you go to?

Are you aware that the Federal government is not just the President? Unlike Obama, Reagan was not a dictator who changed laws and spent at his whim. He also didn't get to ignore the House being in the hands of the other party as Obama did.

So yeah, you're still solidly in the realm of no grasp of economics or history and we can now add to the fields you know nothing about.

Reagan got what he asked for

Now explain Reganomics
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top