2nd amendment case probably headed to SC

[Preacher]

Second Amendment case Peruta vs. California may be heading to Supreme Court

Anti Gun nut jobs just keep asking for an ass kicking....thank god for President Trump putting a conservative on the SC! We could be dealing with an extremist leftist if Clinton had won.

 

[The VOR]

Second Amendment case Peruta vs. California may be heading to Supreme Court

Anti Gun nut jobs just keep asking for an ass kicking....thank god for President Trump putting a conservative on the SC! We could be dealing with an extremist leftist if Clinton had won.

What sane person doesn't get up every morning and thank a nonexistent entity who lives in the clouds for herr drumph?

 

[danielpalos]

Second Amendment case Peruta vs. California may be heading to Supreme Court

Anti Gun nut jobs just keep asking for an ass kicking....thank god for President Trump putting a conservative on the SC! We could be dealing with an extremist leftist if Clinton had won.

Well regulated militia do not need to carry concealed weapons. Why do gun lovers?

That being said; Persons are presumed innocent until proved guilty.

Thus, concealed carry should only be denied and disparaged, for cause.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Second Amendment case Peruta vs. California may be heading to Supreme Court

Anti Gun nut jobs just keep asking for an ass kicking....thank god for President Trump putting a conservative on the SC! We could be dealing with an extremist leftist if Clinton had won.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Second Amendment case Peruta vs. California may be heading to Supreme Court

Anti Gun nut jobs just keep asking for an ass kicking....thank god for President Trump putting a conservative on the SC! We could be dealing with an extremist leftist if Clinton had won.

The mythology that americans will be free from an over reaching gubment on accounta we gots guns is fiction son; you're THE most incarcerated and surveilled population in the history of the planet. Your ISP providers sell your browsing histories, your "employer" can now demand your bloodwork for access to their "healthcare" plan, and legislation is in the works to expand that to them being able to demand your genetic profile; all of which can be traded and sold amongst the substantial people. Soon "employers" will access all of that information during the "background" check of job applicants. Americans lack the nads to stand up to this, with or without guns.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

Well regulated militia don't need to carry concealed weapons, why do gun lovers?

 

[Wyatt earp]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

What these words are to complicated for you to comprehend




shall not be infringed.

.

 

[Crixus]

Second Amendment case Peruta vs. California may be heading to Supreme Court

Anti Gun nut jobs just keep asking for an ass kicking....thank god for President Trump putting a conservative on the SC! We could be dealing with an extremist leftist if Clinton had won.

The last time faith was put on a judge oppointed to the SC by a republican he turned out to be a dud. That would be John Roberts. I'll believe it when I see it.

 

[Cellblock2429]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

Well regulated militia don't need to carry concealed weapons, why do gun lovers?

/----- How do you know what they carry?
Get Ready For Concealed And Open Carry On Military Bases
taskandpurpose.com/get-ready-concealed-open-carry-military-bases/
Nov 22, 2016 - Get Ready For Concealed And Open Carry On Military Bases. By ... Related: Why Does The Military Ban Soldiers From Carrying Guns? ».
Military Personnel Can Carry Private, Concealed Weapons On Bases ...
www.ibtimes.com/military-personnel-can-carry-private-concealed-weapons-bases-pen...
Nov 22, 2016 - American military personnel can now carry privately owned, concealed weapons at defense facilities, the Pentagon said in recent directive.

 

[Wyatt earp]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

Well regulated militia don't need to carry concealed weapons, why do gun lovers?

Ok open carry will do.




.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Second Amendment case Peruta vs. California may be heading to Supreme Court

Anti Gun nut jobs just keep asking for an ass kicking....thank god for President Trump putting a conservative on the SC! We could be dealing with an extremist leftist if Clinton had won.

What sane person doesn't get up every morning and thank a nonexistent entity who lives in the clouds for herr drumph?

What sane person doesn't get up every morning and thank a nonexistent entity who lives in the clouds

People like this always seem to change their minds when it is THEIR time to meet that nonexistent entity.

 

[JBond]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

Fail.

I am curious. Why do you care about how I carry my gun? Would you feel better if it was strapped to my thigh in plain sight? If so, why?

 

[danielpalos]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

What these words are to complicated for you to comprehend




shall not be infringed.

.

Well regulated militia are, made regular, not made, concealed carry.

 

[Crixus]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

Well regulated militia don't need to carry concealed weapons, why do gun lovers?

Ok open carry will do.




.

Mm, with rules. Open carry is fine, but there is more to it then strapping up and stepping out.

 

[JBond]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

Well regulated militia don't need to carry concealed weapons, why do gun lovers?

Ok open carry will do.




.

No, it will not do. Snowflakes and pussy hats would freak out. I'd rather just go about my business without having to deal with a bunch of jackass facists.

 

[danielpalos]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

Well regulated militia don't need to carry concealed weapons, why do gun lovers?

/----- How do you know what they carry?
Get Ready For Concealed And Open Carry On Military Bases
taskandpurpose.com/get-ready-concealed-open-carry-military-bases/
Nov 22, 2016 - Get Ready For Concealed And Open Carry On Military Bases. By ... Related: Why Does The Military Ban Soldiers From Carrying Guns? ».
Military Personnel Can Carry Private, Concealed Weapons On Bases ...
www.ibtimes.com/military-personnel-can-carry-private-concealed-weapons-bases-pen...
Nov 22, 2016 - American military personnel can now carry privately owned, concealed weapons at defense facilities, the Pentagon said in recent directive.

Federal enclaves are subject only to the rules of our federal Congress, limited by our Constitution.

 

[Wyatt earp]

Second Amendment case Peruta vs. California may be heading to Supreme Court

Anti Gun nut jobs just keep asking for an ass kicking....thank god for President Trump putting a conservative on the SC! We could be dealing with an extremist leftist if Clinton had won.

The last time faith was put on a judge oppointed to the SC by a republican he turned out to be a dud. That would be John Roberts. I'll believe it when I see it.

Not a dude someone who goes by the Constitution, you win some, you lose some...with lefty judges you lose them all.


.

 

[JBond]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

What these words are to complicated for you to comprehend




shall not be infringed.

.

Well regulated militia are, made regular, not made, concealed carry.

Why are you so scared?

 

[danielpalos]

There is no "right" to carry concealed weapons enshrined within Amendment II. It is extremely doubtful SCOTUS would even grant certiorari to hear it given the nature of the case and the most recent precedents in Heller just 10 years ago.

Well regulated militia don't need to carry concealed weapons, why do gun lovers?

Ok open carry will do.

.

And? Acquiring and possessing private property in the class called Arms is a natural right, subject only to Due Process.