2nd Impeachment? House counsel suggests Trump could be impeached again

[playtime]

um, no. there was no impeachment inquiry or trial regarding mueller's investigation.

If there was anything there, then they should and would have included it in the first impeachment.

The very idea of holding back charges from the first impeachment, so that they can be used as a basis for subsequent impeachments when the first fails, pretty much proves what everyone already knows—that this was never about any legitimate legal complaints against the President, but merely an abuse of the process for the purpose of harassing and undermining him.

They might try to hold them back from the Senate till after the election to try to take the Senate back....

doubtful. i think pelosi is holding back just long enough for a few (R) senators to vote on the rules to allow witness', & with this latest email by one of the dudes fighting a subpoena, telling the OMB to hold back funds but keep it hush just help that happen or if more info comes out in the coming days.

What makes you think anyone in the senate will cave to the bitches extortion?

.

it will only take 3.

oooOOOOOOooooo.....you calling nancy a bitch?

 

[playtime]

Man, I hope like Hell that the Dems lose their House majority next November, cuz they ain't going to stop digging to find anything they can use to de-legitimize Trump if he gets re-elected. I guess they can pretty much do what they want, impeach Trump a 2nd time or amend the 1st impeachment to include another charge(s), but it doesn't look like they're going to just let it go. I kinda doubt they'll get the courts to force McGhan or anyone else to testify, and it's doubtful IMHO that even if they did would any of them provide any dirt of Trump? They don't have to lie, they can just say "I don't remember" or "on the advice of counsel I respectfully decline to answer". All they're doing is making themselves look even worse than they already do. The far left wing of the Dem Party has them by the balls, apparently. And it's going to cost them.

just like 2018 - the house flipped for 2 reasons.

going after trump & healthcare. that will be the top issues AGAIN for 2020. the more info comes out, whether it's thru FOI or leaks - there will be more demand for witness' to testify. & the ACA is in the courts right now with even more to lose that pre existing conditions.

oh no sweetheart you all decided to make IMPEACHMENT a top issue.

Now we gonna be happy to watch you eat that crap sandwich one miserable bite at a time

sure, you keep telling yerself that suze. i do believe the (D)s can walk & chew gum at the same time & the debates are covering donny maybe 10 minutes outa 2 hours.

lol.... you funny.

 

[playtime]

Nancy just needs to rewrite the rules for 'High Crimes' and 'Misdemeanors' to encompass
calling the Speaker of the House, "Crazy Nancy".
They'll get him then.

Dem's have become paranoid and a laughing stock. Who knew Dem's were such snowflakes, Trump trolls them a bit and they lose it. The very definition of they can dish it out but they can't take it.

oh lordy - did you catch him earlier today at mar a lago? goin' on & on about how unfair this all is to him? fat orange man baby isn't having a nice x-mas after all..............................

 

[22lcidw]

um, no. there was no impeachment inquiry or trial regarding mueller's investigation.

If there was anything there, then they should and would have included it in the first impeachment.

The very idea of holding back charges from the first impeachment, so that they can be used as a basis for subsequent impeachments when the first fails, pretty much proves what everyone already knows—that this was never about any legitimate legal complaints against the President, but merely an abuse of the process for the purpose of harassing and undermining him.

They might try to hold them back from the Senate till after the election to try to take the Senate back....

doubtful. i think pelosi is holding back just long enough for a few (R) senators to vote on the rules to allow witness', & with this latest email by one of the dudes fighting a subpoena, telling the OMB to hold back funds but keep it hush just help that happen or if more info comes out in the coming days.

What makes you think anyone in the senate will cave to the bitches extortion?

.

it will only take 3.

oooOOOOOOooooo.....you calling nancy a bitch?

Nancy runs in a district that is a guarantee win. She helped to hose the people with Obamacare and knew it. Many people suffered from the extra charges, the penalties and the hidden bills. Honor, integrity and character just for that fiasco would have meant she retired. Nancy was a reason Trump was elected. She is acting just like I thought she would. And this is good for Trump.

 

[playtime]

so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?

Hey, crying wolf is a huge mistake.

That's why you keep the powder dry. Now it looks like MORE bullshit. Dems lost credibility.

.

they aren't crying wolf - it has been said that if new available info surfaces, then things might change. in the civilian world, ever hear 'more charges may follow'? it's the same thing.

 

[Mac-7]

so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?

Hey, crying wolf is a huge mistake.

That's why you keep the powder dry. Now it looks like MORE bullshit. Dems lost credibility.

.

they aren't crying wolf - it has been said that if new available info surfaces, then things might change. in the civilian world, ever hear 'more charges may follow'? it's the same thing.

Impeachment has become a farce

The democrats have totally lost their minds

 

[playtime]

um, no. there was no impeachment inquiry or trial regarding mueller's investigation.

If there was anything there, then they should and would have included it in the first impeachment.

The very idea of holding back charges from the first impeachment, so that they can be used as a basis for subsequent impeachments when the first fails, pretty much proves what everyone already knows—that this was never about any legitimate legal complaints against the President, but merely an abuse of the process for the purpose of harassing and undermining him.

no dummy - they wanted mcghan 8 months ago - only NOW is it possible because they went to the courts & finally got a ruling in their favor. but you are saying that now isn't a good time? oh well, homey don't play that.

So why didn’t they wait again?

they are going with what they can prove now. why should they pause for everything all at once?

 

[OKTexas]

WTF? Another impeachment? We are now entering the Twilight zone:

House counsel suggests Trump could be impeached again

"The House is open to the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump a second time, lawyers for the Judiciary Committee said Monday.
House Counsel Douglas Letter said in a filing in federal court that a second impeachment could be necessary if the House uncovers new evidence that Trump attempted to obstruct investigations of his conduct. Letter made the argument as part of an inquiry by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals about whether Democrats still need testimony from former White House Counsel Don McGahn following the votes last week to charge Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
"If McGahn’s testimony produces new evidence supporting the conclusion that President Trump committed impeachable offenses that are not covered by the Articles approved by the House, the Committee will proceed accordingly—including, if necessary, by considering whether to recommend new articles of impeachment," Letter wrote."

All the court said is McGahn has to show up, nothing says he can't still claim executive privilege and not answer questions.

.

EP wasn't extended when he talked to mueller. you can't retroactively impose it & that is the crux. nor can you claim it when a crime was committed.

Were is that written, other than left extremist hate sites?

.

 

[playtime]

"Right now I’m on a Christmas light tour in a very conservative southern city. The tour guide just mentioned Trump getting impeached, everyone applauded. Including the kids." - Sassy Scott Dworkin

i have a 'tuck frump' button on my pocketbook & only one person outa maybe 10 said something negative - the rest liked it & said he's got to go.

 

[OKTexas]

so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?

The appearance of partisan piling-on--is not a good one for the Democrats..IMO. You are risking overloading the public and turning them against the left. Offend their sense of fair play at your own risk.

the request for don mcghan's testimony came 8 months ago & donny refused to comply. & it has been publicly mentioned that the 'obstruction of congress' might encompass mueller to demonstrate a pattern.


Top House Democrat wants Mueller findings in impeachment articles against Trump
By Emma Dumain
December 03, 2019 08:47 PM
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article237826049.html

Mueller evidence likely to be included in articles of impeachment
Details may be used to show pattern of obstruction
Mueller evidence likely to be included in articles of impeachment
By:Manu Raju and Jeremy Herb, CNN
Posted: Dec 06, 2019 01:02 AM CST
Updated: Dec 06, 2019 07:58 AM CST

Yet that didn't happen, did it?

.

who knows? donny obstructed it all via barr.

Feel free to quote where anything in the Mueller report was cited in the articles. You don't understand English too well, do you?

.

 

[OKTexas]

um, no. there was no impeachment inquiry or trial regarding mueller's investigation.

If there was anything there, then they should and would have included it in the first impeachment.

The very idea of holding back charges from the first impeachment, so that they can be used as a basis for subsequent impeachments when the first fails, pretty much proves what everyone already knows—that this was never about any legitimate legal complaints against the President, but merely an abuse of the process for the purpose of harassing and undermining him.

no dummy - they wanted mcghan 8 months ago - only NOW is it possible because they went to the courts & finally got a ruling in their favor. but you are saying that now isn't a good time? oh well, homey don't play that.

Yet, it's still in court. Go figure.

.

why would that be little kitty? cause donny is appealing it. my my my.... that really makes him look innocent............................. oh did i say innocent? lol...

It's called due process, look it up.

.

 

[playtime]

WTF? Another impeachment? We are now entering the Twilight zone:

House counsel suggests Trump could be impeached again

"The House is open to the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump a second time, lawyers for the Judiciary Committee said Monday.
House Counsel Douglas Letter said in a filing in federal court that a second impeachment could be necessary if the House uncovers new evidence that Trump attempted to obstruct investigations of his conduct. Letter made the argument as part of an inquiry by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals about whether Democrats still need testimony from former White House Counsel Don McGahn following the votes last week to charge Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
"If McGahn’s testimony produces new evidence supporting the conclusion that President Trump committed impeachable offenses that are not covered by the Articles approved by the House, the Committee will proceed accordingly—including, if necessary, by considering whether to recommend new articles of impeachment," Letter wrote."

All the court said is McGahn has to show up, nothing says he can't still claim executive privilege and not answer questions.

.

EP wasn't extended when he talked to mueller. you can't retroactively impose it & that is the crux. nor can you claim it when a crime was committed.

Were is that written, other than left extremist hate sites?

.

lol...i don't use obviously biased sites, pussy

cat.

CAN TRUMP USE EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE TO BLOCK MCGAHN’S TESTIMONY?

Legal experts said that conversations between a president and the White House counsel were exactly the sort of thing that executive privilege is intended to keep private.

On the other hand, a strong argument could be made that Trump long ago forfeited, or waived, his right to make an executive privilege claim over his conversations with Don McGahn, said Michael Stern, a former congressional lawyer in Washington.

Much like the attorney-client privilege, executive privilege is intended to keep conversations private. Generally speaking, once third parties are told about such conversations, they are no longer secret and the privilege has been waived, legal experts said.

McGahn, then the White House counsel, was allowed to sit for several interviews with Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team and McGahn’s testimony was cited 157 times in Mueller’s 448-page report on Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election and Trump’s attempts to impede that inquiry. That means any executive privilege claim has likely been waived, Stern said.

Explainer: Can Trump use executive privilege to block congressional probes?

yer welcome.

 

[playtime]

so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?

The appearance of partisan piling-on--is not a good one for the Democrats..IMO. You are risking overloading the public and turning them against the left. Offend their sense of fair play at your own risk.

the request for don mcghan's testimony came 8 months ago & donny refused to comply. & it has been publicly mentioned that the 'obstruction of congress' might encompass mueller to demonstrate a pattern.


Top House Democrat wants Mueller findings in impeachment articles against Trump
By Emma Dumain
December 03, 2019 08:47 PM
https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/congress/article237826049.html

Mueller evidence likely to be included in articles of impeachment
Details may be used to show pattern of obstruction
Mueller evidence likely to be included in articles of impeachment
By:Manu Raju and Jeremy Herb, CNN
Posted: Dec 06, 2019 01:02 AM CST
Updated: Dec 06, 2019 07:58 AM CST

Yet that didn't happen, did it?

.

who knows? donny obstructed it all via barr.

Feel free to quote where anything in the Mueller report was cited in the articles. You don't understand English too well, do you?

.

it didn't. what it DID say, was( to paraphrase) was that if anything new arises that can show a pattern of behavior of obstruction --- then it might become an issue. why would you have a problem with that.

 

[playtime]

um, no. there was no impeachment inquiry or trial regarding mueller's investigation.

If there was anything there, then they should and would have included it in the first impeachment.

The very idea of holding back charges from the first impeachment, so that they can be used as a basis for subsequent impeachments when the first fails, pretty much proves what everyone already knows—that this was never about any legitimate legal complaints against the President, but merely an abuse of the process for the purpose of harassing and undermining him.

no dummy - they wanted mcghan 8 months ago - only NOW is it possible because they went to the courts & finally got a ruling in their favor. but you are saying that now isn't a good time? oh well, homey don't play that.

Yet, it's still in court. Go figure.

.

why would that be little kitty? cause donny is appealing it. my my my.... that really makes him look innocent............................. oh did i say innocent? lol...

It's called due process, look it up.

.

yep. all legal means to slow down & clog up the system trying to avoid the inevitable.

 

[OKTexas]

um, no. there was no impeachment inquiry or trial regarding mueller's investigation.

If there was anything there, then they should and would have included it in the first impeachment.

The very idea of holding back charges from the first impeachment, so that they can be used as a basis for subsequent impeachments when the first fails, pretty much proves what everyone already knows—that this was never about any legitimate legal complaints against the President, but merely an abuse of the process for the purpose of harassing and undermining him.

They might try to hold them back from the Senate till after the election to try to take the Senate back....

doubtful. i think pelosi is holding back just long enough for a few (R) senators to vote on the rules to allow witness', & with this latest email by one of the dudes fighting a subpoena, telling the OMB to hold back funds but keep it hush just help that happen or if more info comes out in the coming days.

What makes you think anyone in the senate will cave to the bitches extortion?

.

it will only take 3.

oooOOOOOOooooo.....you calling nancy a bitch?

Wrong again dumbass, three would make it a 50/50 tie, the VP would be called to break the tie. I guess you're too stupid to know the VP is the president of the senate.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

so if new intel or docs or factual witness' testify that donny is knee deep in putin's shit, he should get a pass because of the current shit he is knee deep in?

Hey, crying wolf is a huge mistake.

That's why you keep the powder dry. Now it looks like MORE bullshit. Dems lost credibility.

.

they aren't crying wolf - it has been said that if new available info surfaces, then things might change. in the civilian world, ever hear 'more charges may follow'? it's the same thing.

Well, the first impeachment appears like complete bullshit. So, the "more charges to come" will need to REALLY blow some skirts up to overcome the stigma the first impeachment has created.

It better be good or it will look like more bullshit.

.

 

[Meister]

Nancy just needs to rewrite the rules for 'High Crimes' and 'Misdemeanors' to encompass
calling the Speaker of the House, "Crazy Nancy".
They'll get him then.

Dem's have become paranoid and a laughing stock. Who knew Dem's were such snowflakes, Trump trolls them a bit and they lose it. The very definition of they can dish it out but they can't take it.

oh lordy - did you catch him earlier today at mar a lago? goin' on & on about how unfair this all is to him? fat orange man baby isn't having a nice x-mas after all..............................

Stay tuned, Playtime....the dems are being exposed.

 

[Meister]

um, no. there was no impeachment inquiry or trial regarding mueller's investigation.

If there was anything there, then they should and would have included it in the first impeachment.

The very idea of holding back charges from the first impeachment, so that they can be used as a basis for subsequent impeachments when the first fails, pretty much proves what everyone already knows—that this was never about any legitimate legal complaints against the President, but merely an abuse of the process for the purpose of harassing and undermining him.

They might try to hold them back from the Senate till after the election to try to take the Senate back....

doubtful. i think pelosi is holding back just long enough for a few (R) senators to vote on the rules to allow witness', & with this latest email by one of the dudes fighting a subpoena, telling the OMB to hold back funds but keep it hush just help that happen or if more info comes out in the coming days.

What makes you think anyone in the senate will cave to the bitches extortion?

.

it will only take 3.

oooOOOOOOooooo.....you calling nancy a bitch?

They should have used the courts while this was in the House.....but the bitch was in too much of a hurry.
Oh well, they had their chance and blew it....like usual. Trump 2020

 

[OKTexas]

"Right now I’m on a Christmas light tour in a very conservative southern city. The tour guide just mentioned Trump getting impeached, everyone applauded. Including the kids." - Sassy Scott Dworkin

i have a 'tuck frump' button on my pocketbook & only one person outa maybe 10 said something negative - the rest liked it & said he's got to go.

Do they only show CNN in your facility? LMAO

.

 

[Polishprince]

WTF? Another impeachment? We are now entering the Twilight zone:

House counsel suggests Trump could be impeached again

"The House is open to the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump a second time, lawyers for the Judiciary Committee said Monday.
House Counsel Douglas Letter said in a filing in federal court that a second impeachment could be necessary if the House uncovers new evidence that Trump attempted to obstruct investigations of his conduct. Letter made the argument as part of an inquiry by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals about whether Democrats still need testimony from former White House Counsel Don McGahn following the votes last week to charge Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
"If McGahn’s testimony produces new evidence supporting the conclusion that President Trump committed impeachable offenses that are not covered by the Articles approved by the House, the Committee will proceed accordingly—including, if necessary, by considering whether to recommend new articles of impeachment," Letter wrote."

If the Republicans can take the House next November, that will be the end to the Fake Impeachments.

However if the D's continue to control the House, this bullshit will continue until the end of the 2nd Kushner Administration.