3 stupid myths republicans believe

2004-2007...
I love the way Conservatives won't state one year at a time.
Of course people were being hired in 2006-2007; under FALSE pretenses created by a HOUSING BUBBLE!

Myths is a specialist in this sort of thing.

Everyone knows that the CIA cooked the intel going into Iraq; so much Colin Powell--the sitting Secretary of State--basically had it out with his intel officers prior to his UN Testimony. Asreported in the Guardian (the current Conservative paper of favor)

Powell's doubts over CIA intelligence on Iraq prompted him to set up secret review | World news | The Guardian

Yet whenever Iraq is brought up, Myths is quick to cite the Democrats without Powell's access (they were outside the administration) believed the CIA's reports about Iraq's WMDs. Basically Bush made the CIA a propaganda arm of his administration.

"Everyone knows"...
Ya know in which bodily orifice you can cram that.

Everybody with two brain cells so obviously you do not qualify.
 
The state of New York has an ad campaign on radio and TV offering tax incentives to business if they relocate to NY. What's that all about? Can it be that even the most aggressive tax and spend state realizes that they can't tax their way to prosperity?

I suspect it means the Democratic Governor of NY state understands that targeted tax cuts work. Too bad the Republicans still believe cutting taxes to Billionaires tickle down. We've learned they put those tax savings into foreign banks and invest in foreign companies; obviously they do not tickle down to other Americans, otherwise the Bush tax cuts which Obama extended would have either prevented or lessened and shortened the Great Recession.

Wait a minute, some tax breaks are good aren't they? That busts billy boy's crazy myth thread doesn't it?
 
Myths is a specialist in this sort of thing.

Everyone knows that the CIA cooked the intel going into Iraq; so much Colin Powell--the sitting Secretary of State--basically had it out with his intel officers prior to his UN Testimony. Asreported in the Guardian (the current Conservative paper of favor)

Powell's doubts over CIA intelligence on Iraq prompted him to set up secret review | World news | The Guardian

Yet whenever Iraq is brought up, Myths is quick to cite the Democrats without Powell's access (they were outside the administration) believed the CIA's reports about Iraq's WMDs. Basically Bush made the CIA a propaganda arm of his administration.

"Everyone knows"...
Ya know in which bodily orifice you can cram that.

Everybody with two brain cells so obviously you do not qualify.

True. He does not have 2 brain cells but many more. You OTOH lack the second brain cell. This explains not just your posts but your choice of avatar.
 
The state of New York has an ad campaign on radio and TV offering tax incentives to business if they relocate to NY. What's that all about? Can it be that even the most aggressive tax and spend state realizes that they can't tax their way to prosperity?

Sort of like a pay tv/internet promotion. They give you all kinds of goodies for next to nothing. When the promo runs out, the bill doubles.
I am sure there is a catch to this. Otherwise, existing businesses located in NY would be full of livid owners and investors.
 
Myths is a specialist in this sort of thing.

Everyone knows that the CIA cooked the intel going into Iraq; so much Colin Powell--the sitting Secretary of State--basically had it out with his intel officers prior to his UN Testimony. Asreported in the Guardian (the current Conservative paper of favor)

Powell's doubts over CIA intelligence on Iraq prompted him to set up secret review | World news | The Guardian

Yet whenever Iraq is brought up, Myths is quick to cite the Democrats without Powell's access (they were outside the administration) believed the CIA's reports about Iraq's WMDs. Basically Bush made the CIA a propaganda arm of his administration.

"Everyone knows"...
Ya know in which bodily orifice you can cram that.

Everybody with two brain cells so obviously you do not qualify.
Qualify for what? Indoctrination into the liberal ideology?
Hey Cornhole, you peek out from under your rock to see if a thread may have an angle for you to spout your women's lib agenda. Only then do you comment.
You are perhaps one the least substantive posters on USMB.
After seeing your insipid whiny posts, I wonder why you bother.
No matter how hard you have to think of a clever response to my posts, you cannot beat me. You cannot win because you've never presented a single useful fact that was relevant to any thread. All you ever do is complain.
 
"Everyone knows"...
Ya know in which bodily orifice you can cram that.

Everybody with two brain cells so obviously you do not qualify.
Qualify for what? Indoctrination into the liberal ideology?
Hey Cornhole, you peek out from under your rock to see if a thread may have an angle for you to spout your women's lib agenda. Only then do you comment.
You are perhaps one the least substantive posters on USMB.
After seeing your insipid whiny posts, I wonder why you bother.
No matter how hard you have to think of a clever response to my posts, you cannot beat me. You cannot win because you've never presented a single useful fact that was relevant to any thread. All you ever do is complain.

I would take issue that hse is one of the least substantive posters. But only because the competition is so fierce.
 
"Everyone knows"...
Ya know in which bodily orifice you can cram that.

Everybody with two brain cells so obviously you do not qualify.
Qualify for what? Indoctrination into the liberal ideology?
Hey Cornhole, you peek out from under your rock to see if a thread may have an angle for you to spout your women's lib agenda. Only then do you comment.
You are perhaps one the least substantive posters on USMB.
After seeing your insipid whiny posts, I wonder why you bother.
No matter how hard you have to think of a clever response to my posts, you cannot beat me. You cannot win because you've never presented a single useful fact that was relevant to any thread. All you ever do is complain.

Colin Powell called the intel he was asked to present "bullshit". That is a fact. You lose boy.

You should put me on ignore for your own good.
 
Quit eating shit....

1) Tax cuts pay for themselves.

Wrong. Every dollar lost in revenue is one more dollar the government needs to borrow to pay their bills. It's so obnoxious when repubs complain of gov spending yet are too ignorant to realize tax cutting leads to more borrowing. You think over spending is the only reason for our debt? No, it is also because of Bush's tax cuts.

2) Liberals are socialists/communists

Also wrong. We are talking about fundamental definitions of words here. Saying liberals are socialists is just as stupid as saying conservatives are liberals.

3) The wealthy are not too wealthy.

95% of income gains have gone to the top 5% of earners despite the fact that the lower classes are responsible for most of the productivity. In fact, productivity has grown exponentially in the lower classes since the 30s yet wages have remained flat.
 
1) Tax cuts pay for themselves.

Wrong. Every dollar lost in revenue is one more dollar the government needs to borrow to pay their bills. It's so obnoxious when repubs complain of gov spending yet are too ignorant to realize tax cutting leads to more borrowing. You think over spending is the only reason for our debt? No, it is also because of Bush's tax cuts.

2) Liberals are socialists/communists

Also wrong. We are talking about fundamental definitions of words here. Saying liberals are socialists is just as stupid as saying conservatives are liberals.

3) The wealthy are not too wealthy.

95% of income gains have gone to the top 5% of earners despite the fact that the lower classes are responsible for most of the productivity. In fact, productivity has grown exponentially in the lower classes since the 30s yet wages have remained flat.

1) They do pay for themselves. You see, if you have more people paying taxes on more economic activity you can actually make MORE money then you currently have. In fact, every time taxes are cut, the economy improves and the treasury brings more money in. It's called the Laffer Curve, look it up.

2) The leadership sure leans that way. Progressives called themselves progressives because they believe in progresing society towards socialism/communism step by step. Through evolution rather than revolution. When progressives were exposed in the 1920s, they scared the heck out of the population and so rebranded themselves as liberals, while traditional "liberal" viewpoints were adopted by conservatives and libertarians.

3) Who the heck are you to determine what too wealthy is? If someone is blessed more for his labor, why should I have a right to force him to pay for what I want to be done? Why should I be angry at my brother because of his success? Rather, I should rejoice in it. And persuade and encourage him to use his resources wisely. But how he ultimately uses it is between him and God. Why do you want to be a robber in your heart?

1) bullshit. Only 4.6 jobs were created per million dollar cut from Bush's tax cuts. Tax cuts for the wealthy only help the wealthy. All they do is stimulate supply. They do very little to stimulate demand. Only a con would think less revenue is a good thing.

2) typical fluff. Why do you bother?

3) so you think it is a good thing only the wealthy have seen income gains since the 30s?

This is why you can't really debate with right wingers. Bush typified their "style of argument". Bush would stand in front of a mic, lie his ass off. Say things like "You are with us or with the terrorists" be totally incomprehensible, and then walk away full of swagger saying to no one in particular "Nailed it".
 
Everybody with two brain cells so obviously you do not qualify.
Qualify for what? Indoctrination into the liberal ideology?
Hey Cornhole, you peek out from under your rock to see if a thread may have an angle for you to spout your women's lib agenda. Only then do you comment.
You are perhaps one the least substantive posters on USMB.
After seeing your insipid whiny posts, I wonder why you bother.
No matter how hard you have to think of a clever response to my posts, you cannot beat me. You cannot win because you've never presented a single useful fact that was relevant to any thread. All you ever do is complain.

I would take issue that hse is one of the least substantive posters. But only because the competition is so fierce.

That's fuckin hilarious!!!!!
 
Everybody with two brain cells so obviously you do not qualify.
Qualify for what? Indoctrination into the liberal ideology?
Hey Cornhole, you peek out from under your rock to see if a thread may have an angle for you to spout your women's lib agenda. Only then do you comment.
You are perhaps one the least substantive posters on USMB.
After seeing your insipid whiny posts, I wonder why you bother.
No matter how hard you have to think of a clever response to my posts, you cannot beat me. You cannot win because you've never presented a single useful fact that was relevant to any thread. All you ever do is complain.

Colin Powell called the intel he was asked to present "bullshit". That is a fact. You lose boy.

You should put me on ignore for your own good.

What the fuck does Colin Powell have to do with anything.
Try staying on point, you bridge troll.
 
The state of New York has an ad campaign on radio and TV offering tax incentives to business if they relocate to NY. What's that all about? Can it be that even the most aggressive tax and spend state realizes that they can't tax their way to prosperity?

I suspect it means the Democratic Governor of NY state understands that targeted tax cuts work. Too bad the Republicans still believe cutting taxes to Billionaires tickle down. We've learned they put those tax savings into foreign banks and invest in foreign companies; obviously they do not tickle down to other Americans, otherwise the Bush tax cuts which Obama extended would have either prevented or lessened and shortened the Great Recession.

How well has it worked for Illinois? They raised taxes on everyone and then hadf to give "targeted tax breaks" to select companies so they wouldn't move out of state. In other words, bribery.
No doubt targeted tax breaks appeals to you, with government picking winners and losers and all. But in the real world the free market determines those things. In your world taxpayer end up supporting corporations that should have been left to fail.

During the Mario Cuomo regime( 16 years)NY taxed the shit out of business and there was a mass exodus to the state lines. Cuomo surmised that no business would ever leave New York. That arrogant belief that "if you're not in New York, you're nowhere, was the undoing of the State's economy and status as a leader in business.
There are areas of the State that have never recovered. That's going back nearly 30 years.
 
Qualify for what? Indoctrination into the liberal ideology?
Hey Cornhole, you peek out from under your rock to see if a thread may have an angle for you to spout your women's lib agenda. Only then do you comment.
You are perhaps one the least substantive posters on USMB.
After seeing your insipid whiny posts, I wonder why you bother.
No matter how hard you have to think of a clever response to my posts, you cannot beat me. You cannot win because you've never presented a single useful fact that was relevant to any thread. All you ever do is complain.

Colin Powell called the intel he was asked to present "bullshit". That is a fact. You lose boy.

You should put me on ignore for your own good.

What the fuck does Colin Powell have to do with anything.
Try staying on point, you bridge troll.

He was Secretary of State when Bush decided to invade Iraq shit brains.
Try staying on point you idiot.
 
"He was Secretary of State when Bush decided to invade Iraq shit brains."

Why that's, uh, completely irrelevant! :lol:
 
Everybody with two brain cells so obviously you do not qualify.
Qualify for what? Indoctrination into the liberal ideology?
Hey Cornhole, you peek out from under your rock to see if a thread may have an angle for you to spout your women's lib agenda. Only then do you comment.
You are perhaps one the least substantive posters on USMB.
After seeing your insipid whiny posts, I wonder why you bother.
No matter how hard you have to think of a clever response to my posts, you cannot beat me. You cannot win because you've never presented a single useful fact that was relevant to any thread. All you ever do is complain.

Colin Powell called the intel he was asked to present "bullshit". That is a fact. You lose boy.

You should put me on ignore for your own good.

For my own good?..
Ha...Looks like I hit a nerve.
Put you on ignore? NO WAY...You are free entertainment.
"boy"?....Come on corny, you can do better than that.
Why don't you use the word you really want to?
For once in your little code pink spineless liberal life, assert yourself. Come on, go for the gold!
 
Colin Powell called the intel he was asked to present "bullshit". That is a fact. You lose boy.

You should put me on ignore for your own good.

What the fuck does Colin Powell have to do with anything.
Try staying on point, you bridge troll.

He was Secretary of State when Bush decided to invade Iraq shit brains.
Try staying on point you idiot.

That has nothing to do with the thread title.
"Idiot"...."Shit brains".....You can do better than that.....
You don't like men because you aren't getting any. Except the battery powered "any"...
Yes, that was a personal attack.
Gloves are off there, split tail.
You're easy.
 
What the fuck does Colin Powell have to do with anything.
Try staying on point, you bridge troll.

He was Secretary of State when Bush decided to invade Iraq shit brains.
Try staying on point you idiot.

That has nothing to do with the thread title.
"Idiot"...."Shit brains".....You can do better than that.....
You don't like men because you aren't getting any. Except the battery powered "any"...
Yes, that was a personal attack.
Gloves are off there, split tail.
You're easy.

Hilarious. So short-stack...why are you here talking to me? I'm sure its because you have so many better things to do; right? Well, maybe you can get attention from the guys. Remember, it's better to pitch than catch although I'm sure you like being able to watch TV at the same time.

As for the subject...it's about looney conservative ideas. Some of you morons still believe the WMDs were there. Poor babies.

Feel free to attack all you want. After all, Sandra Fluke scares you shitless and that's what you do when you're scared; you go on the attack. Basically you're one generation from the cavemen.
 
Qualify for what? Indoctrination into the liberal ideology?
Hey Cornhole, you peek out from under your rock to see if a thread may have an angle for you to spout your women's lib agenda. Only then do you comment.
You are perhaps one the least substantive posters on USMB.
After seeing your insipid whiny posts, I wonder why you bother.
No matter how hard you have to think of a clever response to my posts, you cannot beat me. You cannot win because you've never presented a single useful fact that was relevant to any thread. All you ever do is complain.

Colin Powell called the intel he was asked to present "bullshit". That is a fact. You lose boy.

You should put me on ignore for your own good.

For my own good?..
Ha...Looks like I hit a nerve.
No, just my funny bone. I find you amusing.

Put you on ignore? NO WAY...You are free entertainment.
The small minded (and small equipped) are often easily entertained. If you only knew how dumb you sound...

"boy"?....Come on corny, you can do better than that.
I bet women tell you that all the time "I can do better"

Why don't you use the word you really want to?
For once in your little code pink spineless liberal life, assert yourself. Come on, go for the gold!

No problems in that department.

Not sure what word you want me to call you. Deviant behavior is Rabbi's department--he has carnal knowledge of Prince Freebuss or whatever the name of the chick that heads the GOP is named ...ask him about it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top