IsaacNewton
Gold Member
- Jun 20, 2015
- 17,308
- 3,697
- 290
“It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”
- Jiddu Krishnamurti -
- Jiddu Krishnamurti -
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your hatred for the 2nd Amendment and the US Constitution is deplorable. .....As them being in our useless 2nd ANAL amendment well-regulated militia's
The 2nd Anal was for, written for, these affordable guns. Like these thangs.
The poor could buy or steal.
Hoping their 2nd ANAL amendment well-regulated militia's righties' to the arms they can have is going to win!
A bomb would’ve been more effective. People will kill with whatever means necessary. Taking one tool away from them solves nothing and will save nobody you fucking spineless piece of shit... Because they will find a way to get it anyway or something else.It's all about the object with you why?
It's just a tool.
Lol - yeah, wonder how may Nikolas Cruz could have killed with a hammer, screwdriver or even a knife?
YOU are just a tool if you believe that (but we already knew ;-)
Libs can’t understand the value of responsible gun ownership.Some people can`t understand why the world thinks we`re nuts.
Third-graders are selling AR-15 raffle tickets in Missouri
What's the problem?
Make up your mind. The government is coming to get you--the Pres and the Senators will not be leading the charge on their white horses--they will send the military -OR-LolomgSome people can`t understand why the world thinks we`re nuts.
Third-graders are selling AR-15 raffle tickets in MissouriPismoe, if they took their AR's and engaged in civil war, they'd be dead, too, not just hungry.you lefties want Americans in the same position as the 'venezuelans' are in . 'maduro' is starving the 'venzies' and they have been disarmed and can do nothing except to starve Doktor .
Our government, not even Venezuela's government, can be fought successfully with AR-15's. I wish you folks would get over that fantasy.
The military is overwhelmingly pro second amendment, they would never go against their own citizens on the very thing they believe in. You loopy kunt
The guys in the military are your friends and will never shoot you.
You can't have this fantasy both ways.
Thanks...“It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.”
- Jiddu Krishnamurti -
It's all about the object with you why?
It's just a tool.
Lol - yeah, wonder how may Nikolas Cruz could have killed with a hammer, screwdriver or even a knife?
YOU are just a tool if you believe that (but we already knew ;-)
True, The military would never turn against its own citizens for the sake of the federal government. They just soon turn on the federal government, because they are overwhelmingly pro second amendment.Libs can’t understand the value of responsible gun ownership.Some people can`t understand why the world thinks we`re nuts.
Third-graders are selling AR-15 raffle tickets in Missouri
What's the problem?Make up your mind. The government is coming to get you--the Pres and the Senators will not be leading the charge on their white horses--they will send the military -OR-LolPismoe, if they took their AR's and engaged in civil war, they'd be dead, too, not just hungry.you lefties want Americans in the same position as the 'venezuelans' are in . 'maduro' is starving the 'venzies' and they have been disarmed and can do nothing except to starve Doktor .
Our government, not even Venezuela's government, can be fought successfully with AR-15's. I wish you folks would get over that fantasy.
The military is overwhelmingly pro second amendment, they would never go against their own citizens on the very thing they believe in. You loopy kunt
The guys in the military are your friends and will never shoot you.
You can't have this fantasy both ways.
The fantasy is only in your head. It would be the FBI, BATF, and DEA that would be doing the confiscation, not the military. But, first they have to try to get all guns registered so they know where they are.
The British tried gun control on Americans and wound up losing a very valuable colony. Americans will not give up their guns without a fight.
Yep, Bombs/vehicles are the preferred terror devices.It's all about the object with you why?
It's just a tool.
Lol - yeah, wonder how may Nikolas Cruz could have killed with a hammer, screwdriver or even a knife?
YOU are just a tool if you believe that (but we already knew ;-)
How about a homemade bomb? 22 killed in explosion after U.K. concert featuring Ariana Grande
Or a lorry? Nice attack: truck driver named as France mourns 84 killed in Bastille Day atrocity – as it happened
Pismoe, the colonists had emptied a fortress of guns and ammunition that was lying fallow (I think it was near the Canadian border--a holdover from the French and Indian wars, though I'm not certain) in order to withstand a British attack. It was a military move. You can't compare them.the American Revolution begins and the reason was that the 'redcoats' were moving to confiscate guns and ammo OldLady . --- The American Revolution begins - Apr 19, 1775 - HISTORY.com ---
In fact, normal people do own these kinds of weapons.It gives third graders the idea that normal people own these kind of weapons. They don`t.
The country is not identified with gun control. I am a conservative and think conservative gun policy is in orfer. No arms of mass destruction or cheap guns should be allowed to be sold. That would limit mass shootings and the special used in gang warfare. Citizens should be able to protect their homes and families but something has to be done about repeating fire guns and cheap guns for gangs.Patterson said by phone Saturday that he considered finding a different raffle item after Wednesday’s mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, but ultimately decided to “turn it into a positive thing” after “getting the hate.”
The fuck is wrong with people? At least have some tact and not hold an event raffling a weapon that just killed 17 people (14 of them children)
Sometimes I wonder if we would be better off splitting the country in half. One sane side and one conservative side. I don't want to live in the same country as these hillbilly ass, gun slinging conservatives anymore.
In fact, normal people do own these kinds of weapons.It gives third graders the idea that normal people own these kind of weapons. They don`t.
---------------------------------------------- of course regular Americans own them and they are very popular.In fact, normal people do own these kinds of weapons.It gives third graders the idea that normal people own these kind of weapons. They don`t.
---------------------------------------- most crime guns are probably stolen guns.The country is not identified with gun control. I am a conservative and think conservative gun policy is in orfer. No arms of mass destruction or cheap guns should be allowed to be sold. That would limit mass shootings and the special used in gang warfare. Citizens should be able to protect their homes and families but something has to be done about repeating fire guns and cheap guns for gangs.Patterson said by phone Saturday that he considered finding a different raffle item after Wednesday’s mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, but ultimately decided to “turn it into a positive thing” after “getting the hate.”
The fuck is wrong with people? At least have some tact and not hold an event raffling a weapon that just killed 17 people (14 of them children)
Sometimes I wonder if we would be better off splitting the country in half. One sane side and one conservative side. I don't want to live in the same country as these hillbilly ass, gun slinging conservatives anymore.
What is your point? I was addressing a specific comment made by another member regarding the normalcy of owning such weapons.In fact, normal people do own these kinds of weapons.It gives third graders the idea that normal people own these kind of weapons. They don`t.
In the Miller case, the supreme court held that the federal government could ban sawed off shotguns because they were not part of ordinary military equipment, and consequently their use could not contribute to the common defense.
-------------------------------------------In fact, normal people do own these kinds of weapons.It gives third graders the idea that normal people own these kind of weapons. They don`t.
In the Miller case, the supreme court held that the federal government could ban sawed off shotguns because they were not part of ordinary military equipment, and consequently their use could not contribute to the common defense.