47 Empty Top Secret Folders .......

[Catman51]

I did actually

Being a waiter in the officers' club does not count.

 

[JoeB131]

Doubtful, or you are a quitter who had gone as far as his lack of ability would take him.

Actually, I make far more in the civilian world than I did in the service, but never mind... If you weren't a white trash loser, you wouldn't support Trump. You are clearly the guy on the left.

 

[Catman51]

Actually, I make far more in the civilian world than I did in the service, but never mind... If you weren't a white trash loser, you wouldn't support Trump. You are clearly the guy on the left.

View attachment 693384

Your stupidity and lack of brains is showing again. I have not supported Trump, except to point out how the losercrats ty to cheat and lie about him, kind of like your opening statement.

BTW, the guy on the left is a typical democrat, only interested in money and power and you seem to only admire that.

 

[JoeB131]

Your stupidity and lack of brains is showing again. I have not supported Trump, except to point out how the losercrats ty to cheat and lie about him, kind of like your opening statement.

BTW, the guy on the left is a typical democrat, only interested in money and power and you seem to only admire that.

I think you are a tad confused... the only reason why the rich are gravitating towards the Democrats now after being hostile to them from FDR to Obama, is because the Republicans have gotten so crazy.

 

[Lesh]

Being a waiter in the officers' club does not count.

So you routinely denigrate others that have served. Yea. You're a Republican

 

[Nostra]

So you routinely denigrate others that have served. Yea. You're a Republican

I'll remember this post if DeSantis is the Republican nominee in 2024.

 

[Catman51]

I think you are a tad confused... the only reason why the rich are gravitating towards the Democrats now after being hostile to them from FDR to Obama, is because the Republicans have gotten so crazy.

Or because the democrats are now paying them off. Typical democrat tactic. Just look who is profiting from the democrat rule and decisions at this time, and the support (censorship) provided by the media.

 

[Catman51]

So you routinely denigrate others that have served. Yea. You're a Republican

I merely point out a truth. If that offends your delicate little self-worth, that is your problem, not anyone elses.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I merely point out a truth. If that offends your delicate little self-worth, that is your problem, not anyone elses.

Lesh attacks former members of the service all the time.

 

[Indeependent]

So you routinely denigrate others that have served. Yea. You're a Republican

If a White serviceman is attacked on the streets of NYC by Black thugs I think I know with whom you will sympathize.

 

[Catman51]

Lesh attacks former members of the service all the time.

I have noticed, and lies about his own experiences.

 

[JoeB131]

Or because the democrats are now paying them off. Typical democrat tactic. Just look who is profiting from the democrat rule and decisions at this time, and the support (censorship) provided by the media.

What censorship is that, exactly? Private companies decided to not repeat Russian disinformation, and you call it censorship.

The real problem was, back before the internet, when a TV station or a Newspaper ran a story, they had an obligation to tell the truth and be accurate, because they could be sued for libel if they weren't.

When you have some loser in his mother's basement with a YouTube channel or a website, they can repeat whatever bullshit they want. Look how long it took to bring Alex Jones to justice for his Sandy Hook lies.

 

[Nostra]

What censorship is that, exactly? Private companies decided to not repeat Russian disinformation, and you call it censorship.

The real problem was, back before the internet, when a TV station or a Newspaper ran a story, they had an obligation to tell the truth and be accurate, because they could be sued for libel if they weren't.

When you have some loser in his mother's basement with a YouTube channel or a website, they can repeat whatever bullshit they want. Look how long it took to bring Alex Jones to justice for his Sandy Hook lies.

The FBI directed Fakebook’s Zuckerberg to delete info they claimed was incorrect. When the Govt colludes with a private company to suppress speech that is censorship.

what was this “Russian disinformation”?

 

[Catman51]

What censorship is that, exactly? Private companies decided to not repeat Russian disinformation, and you call it censorship.

The real problem was, back before the internet, when a TV station or a Newspaper ran a story, they had an obligation to tell the truth and be accurate, because they could be sued for libel if they weren't.

When you have some loser in his mother's basement with a YouTube channel or a website, they can repeat whatever bullshit they want. Look how long it took to bring Alex Jones to justice for his Sandy Hook lies.

They can repeat whatever BS they want...and you believe it.

What censorship? How about reporting only that information that is negative toward one side, never the positive. Always encouraging group think (which you obviously partake in). Never mentioning anything good done by their opponents. And there is much more that anyone without prejudice can easily see. That, of course, excludes you as your hate is out front for all to see.

 

[berg80]

Justice Department leans in on Trump and the empty folders​

One week ago, we learned an intriguing detail about the search of Donald Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago: Along with the roughly 100 classified documents recovered, the government also found 48 folders with banners marked “classified” but which were nonetheless empty.

What we didn’t know was how significant the government considered that finding; the empty folders were merely listed on an inventory list.

On Thursday, though, the Justice Department served notice that the empty folders are of significant interest. And it argued that tracing them to specific classified documents is among the urgent reasons that its review should be allowed to continue.

The Justice Department’s filing urges Judge Aileen M. Cannon to stay part of her ruling this week halting the Justice Department’s review of documents while a special master is allowed to examine them. The government narrowly requests that it be allowed to keep examining only the classified documents, not the many others recovered. It argues that the Justice Department’s criminal probe and the intelligence community’s risk assessment — the latter of which Cannon allowed to have continued access to the documents — are “inextricably” linked.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/09/justice-department-cannon-empty-folders/

It's like the DoJ had to hold a kindergarten class to instruct the judge on the roles the various depts. play under its umbrella.

 

[Lastamender]

Justice Department leans in on Trump and the empty folders​

One week ago, we learned an intriguing detail about the search of Donald Trump’s residence at Mar-a-Lago: Along with the roughly 100 classified documents recovered, the government also found 48 folders with banners marked “classified” but which were nonetheless empty.

What we didn’t know was how significant the government considered that finding; the empty folders were merely listed on an inventory list.

On Thursday, though, the Justice Department served notice that the empty folders are of significant interest. And it argued that tracing them to specific classified documents is among the urgent reasons that its review should be allowed to continue.

The Justice Department’s filing urges Judge Aileen M. Cannon to stay part of her ruling this week halting the Justice Department’s review of documents while a special master is allowed to examine them. The government narrowly requests that it be allowed to keep examining only the classified documents, not the many others recovered. It argues that the Justice Department’s criminal probe and the intelligence community’s risk assessment — the latter of which Cannon allowed to have continued access to the documents — are “inextricably” linked.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/09/justice-department-cannon-empty-folders/

It's like the DoJ had to hold a kindergarten class to instruct the judge on the roles the various depts. play under its umbrella.

The WP cannot be trusted on anything political, legal or otherwise government related issues.

 

[berg80]

The WP cannot be trusted on anything political, legal or otherwise government related issues.

Among the handful of reasons mentioned: the empty folders. And the Justice Department implies that it might indeed be able to use the folders to determine whether there are larger issues than Trump merely having possessed classified documents. Specifically, it cites the possibility that classified documents might have been “lost” or “compromised.”
“The FBI would be chiefly responsible for investigating what materials may have once been stored in these folders and whether they may have been lost or compromised — steps that, again, may require the use of grand jury subpoenas, search warrants, and other criminal investigative tools and could lead to evidence that would also be highly relevant to advancing the criminal investigation,” the DOJ’s filing states.

 

[JoeB131]

They can repeat whatever BS they want...and you believe it.

What censorship? How about reporting only that information that is negative toward one side, never the positive. Always encouraging group think (which you obviously partake in). Never mentioning anything good done by their opponents. And there is much more that anyone without prejudice can easily see. That, of course, excludes you as your hate is out front for all to see.

That's not censorship, buddy, that's a journalistic decision. You guys are the ones who scream FAKE NEWS when you don't like a story, it seems you are the ones with the issue. Your side is the one that talks about "ALTERNATIVE FACTS". You want to live in your own reality, the one where Trump was good at his job.

 

[Catman51]

That's not censorship, buddy, that's a journalistic decision. You guys are the ones who scream FAKE NEWS when you don't like a story, it seems you are the ones with the issue. Your side is the one that talks about "ALTERNATIVE FACTS". You want to live in your own reality, the one where Trump was good at his job.

You truly are a moron. Look up the definition of censorship and not the one your masters make up.

Having information and choosing not to make it public for your own gain is the fact of censorship. You brain must be censored to not know this, or you are intentionally not admitting a fact, which goes right along with what you and yours always do. Part of the reason you lose so much, the public sees right thru your BS.

 

[Nostra]

That's not censorship, buddy, that's a journalistic decision. You guys are the ones who scream FAKE NEWS when you don't like a story, it seems you are the ones with the issue. Your side is the one that talks about "ALTERNATIVE FACTS". You want to live in your own reality, the one where Trump was good at his job.

When you conspire with a govt agency to suppress free speech it is censorship, Simp.