Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong you dipshit. Our Constitution protects everyone's right, regardless of sexual orientation, to equality under the law. You're not supposed to be able to treat people differently under the law because you dislike them.Marriage definitions AND powers reside in the individual states....NOT the Federal Government.
Doesn't matter what congress does except in your own home state legislatures.
Still trying to say the party is run by two retire politicians who during there career changed their minds while your active ones are still there....Remember when Hitlery and Barry Hussein both opposed gay marriage due to their deeply held religious beliefs?
Good times.
I think he was objecting to the US Constitution not allowing him to marry his sister because he is already married to his horse....Wrong you dipshit. Our Constitution protects everyone's right, regardless of sexual orientation, to equality under the law. You're not supposed to be able to treat people differently under the law because you dislike them.
A person can damned sure be charged with two counts of murder if he or she kills a pregnant woman. And that's not contingent upon how far along the victim was carrying.
Dems need to be hitting this hard...With mid term elections coming up, the last thing Republicans want to do is go on the record on abortion, same sex marriage and birth control
Can you form a coherent thought?Still trying to say the party is run by two retire politicians who during there career changed their minds while your active ones are still there....
Nice try but showsthe difference between real confident leaders and a bunch of cowards and bigots..
Nope....that means that it's a tax break/benefit based on a State's endorsement....not an indemnification for marriage.Marriage has federal benefits, taxes, etc. End that and then you have an argument.
Moral turpitude is not a constitutional right or a civil right or a human right in any nation on this planet.Wrong you dipshit. Our Constitution protects everyone's right, regardless of sexual orientation, to equality under the law. You're not supposed to be able to treat people differently under the law because you dislike them.
Nope....that means that it's a tax break/benefit based on a State's endorsement....not an indemnification for marriage.
But that is the constitution we live under.It's never going to work that way but you know that.
Morality isnt real, what we're forcing on you is compliance with the Constitution.Moral turpitude is not a constitutional right or a civil right or a human right in any nation on this planet.
That's forcing an unnatural morality upon people.
But that is the constitution we live under.
If people don't like it they know the process for changing it.
Wow really? Do you support sticking your penis into a goat?Sure, why not? We already allow multi-party contracts in other areas of life, business for example. The question is why don't you? Do gays frighten you?
No, but I support sticking Curried Goat into my mouth. I think you're doing it wrong.Wow really? Do you support sticking your penis into a goat?
It's perfectly normal and legal to treat people that you don't like differently.Wrong you dipshit. Our Constitution protects everyone's right, regardless of sexual orientation, to equality under the law. You're not supposed to be able to treat people differently under the law because you dislike them.
But not legal for the government to do it. It's why it's perfectly acceptable to shit on white wing culture.It's perfectly normal and legal to treat people that you don't like differently.
You are making too many assumptions including morality assumptions that are not constitutional.No it isn't. The Constitution we live under gives equal access to all. Get rid of the federal benefits and then you can make your argument.
You are making too many assumptions including morality assumptions that are not constitutional.
And it only applies to citizens. Not citizens of other countries who happen to visit.
When the Sudanese people visit we don't prosecute them for polygamy or slavery...which they practice.
The Sudanese people do get tax breaks if working inside the USA.The Constitution does not base rights upon "morals". If it did, Clarence would have never been able to marry his wife.
They don't get marital tax breaks.
