ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,719
- 1,830
- Thread starter
- #241
This one is dedicated to the always ClosedMinded author of the ridiculously dopey OP.
The officials at Chick-fil-A are allowed to identify marriage as they fucking deem suitable, according to their religious beliefs, etc.
I agree
AND, you asshat, they have the right to verbalize those thoughts.
Yeah, I know dickhole
FURTHERMORE, you imbecile, when a bunch of left wing hacks try to organize a boycott of that company to protest those thoughts and the expression of such thoughts, it is absolutely and unquestionably proper to stand in opposition to the fucking attempted boycott.
"Attempted Boycott"? Is that the same as no boycott at all? Yep, you've been dupped.
I don't even agree with the position expressed by Chick-fil-A. But I have NO problem in seeing the effort, by the left wing anti-free-speech scumbags to sanction Chick-fil-A's free speech, get undermined. I applaud the rebound effect.
I dont agree with the position of Chick Fil A either but I support their right to say it. Eating a deluxe chicken sandwich is going to make change! Republicans have the silliest protest ideas evar! Freedom Fries, Meat Mondays and now this. Your head just blew up because Closed Minded isnt at all.
Stop you whining. And stop pretending I have a problem with Chick Fil A just so you can go into your flailing your arms mode.
Last edited: