Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You really arent trying to understand. Like most uninformed Trumpers you just make up stuff for yourself. Biden doesnt get to chose who stays, the courts do. If they get swamped the bill gives the secretary power to handle it. Today we just add to the line of 3 years for a court case. You cant apply for asylum anywhere but ports of entry.That does not account for the million or more that show up outside lawful ports of entry
Nor does it prevent biden from rubber stamping every fake asylum seeker at the ports of entry by using the excuse that the immigration judges are swamped and cant handle 5,000 cases a day
The GOP reps in on the negotiation liked it. The Dems thought it gave too much power to the immigration service but went along. I think it gives too much power to the non-courts so I wouldn’t sign myself.citygator
The biden plan leaves a lot of unanswered questions
And dont tell us to trust him because thats not an option
I thought that is what they negotiated.Something that could easily be negotiated in the House but that’s not going to happen because the wingnuts are playing political games and not even willing to talk about it.
Im against the Senate bill. Im for HR 2. Deal.I'm all for the senate bill, but if Trump's minions are going to block it - let them have H.R. 2 and see how it works.
It's better that then they continue to withhold funding for Ukraine.
Biden knows the courts are years away from properly reviewing the largely fake asylum requestsYou really arent trying to understand. Like most uninformed Trumpers you just make up stuff for yourself. Biden doesnt get to chose who stays, the courts do. If they get swamped the bill gives the secretary power to handle it. Today we just add to the line of 3 years for a court case. You cant apply for asylum anywhere but ports of entry.
Nothing will stop them as long as biden is president
Well, no, they'd be here on marriage visas, so that doesn't work.Meaning chinese women who married an American citizen for instance?
It will never pass the Senate, and Biden won't sign it.Im against the Senate bill. Im for HR 2. Deal.
The 5,000 figure isn’t true.The hidden 5000 a day deal from Biden. What a conplete JOKE.
Thats 1.8 million a year. Hardly a change and will not count those swimming across the RIO.
Border Control my ass. Not to mention as Normal the Written Version is Hidden like normal.
Dont piss down my back and tell me its raining Biden.
Sen. Rick Scott: Republicans Cannot Let Bidenâs Open Border Policies Become Law.
Or anyone else. Trump had more undocumented immigrants than Obama did.
Well, no, they'd be here on marriage visas, so that doesn't work.
Nearly all Mrs. B131's friends have American husbands, so I'm sure that ticks you off.
Not at allYou've probably heard things about sideways hoo-has.
You think alot of things that don’t turn out to be accurateI thought that is what they negotiated.
As in it makes them obey law got itNope, just more mean spirited.
Won't stop these folks from coming.
Not at all
I can understand the attraction of men to attractive chinese women
But for a little fun and games in bed you want to flood America with aliens from all over the world
If you were thinking clearly you’d want limit the migrant scam instead of encouraging it
This is insane.![]()
The bipartisan border deal would not allow 5,000 illegal crossings per day, despite what Trump says
What's become a popular talking point among conservative Republicans opposed to an emerging immigration bill is incorrect. Here's what it would do.www.nbcnews.com
Trump made a similar claim to reporters Tuesday: "That’s a terrible bill. Five thousand a day? That’s a lot. That’s, like, record-setting stuff."
But that's not actually what the bipartisan deal would do, according to negotiators who are finalizing the details before they release the full text of the legislation, possibly later this week. Here's what we know:
Migrants would not just be released into the U.S.
Migrants would not be able to just cross the border illegally under the new bill. It would end the practice of "catch and release," in which Border Patrol agents release migrants into the U.S. while they await immigration hearings.
Instead, migrants who tried to cross the border illegally would be detained immediately, with their asylum claims decided while they were in detention. People would be removed immediately within 15 days if they failed their asylum claim interviews.
You are certainly confused by the word illegal!Again, your bigotry isn't my problem.
My father was an immigrant. He served his country in WWII as a medic and a translator, went on to build a family, worked very hard all of his life in an unpleasant job, and died young due to Asbestos exposure.
My wife is an immigrant. She was doing just fine before she met me, but I would say we've greatly improved each other's lives. (Still not used to her funky food, though.)
Immigrants make America better and stronger. That we aren't being as welcoming as we should be, when we both need them and should be acting better, is our problem, not theirs.
Except it doesn't make them obey the law.As in it makes them obey law got it
What are you talking about? Small per centage?Naw, thats a very minute percentage. Again, quit with the propaganda.