52% Say Cheating Impacted 2020

Because source codes are intellectual proprietary property.

Methodology is not, in fact it is just the opposite. If the methodology is not known, no study or poll should ever be taken seriously at all.
You are correct.

However, any poll showing this much distrust, regardless of methodology, indicates a potentially serious problem. And you can't just point the finger at Trump. People who watched the election results and the irregularities were yelling it long before Trump opened his stupid mouth.

Justified or not, there is serious lack of confidence in elections, and unless that is restored, there will be an even bigger divide.
 
Yet could not confirm if those pings are actual drop box patronizers.
sure it did. you should watch the documentary and learn how they did the research. To talk about something you didn't watch shows you to be a fking liar as usual.
 
That simply is not true.

One unusual feature of the Elections Clause is that it does not confer the power to regulate congressional elections on states as a whole, but rather the “Legislature” of each state. The Supreme Court has construed the term “Legislature” extremely broadly to include any entity or procedure that a state’s constitution permits to exercise lawmaking power. Thus, laws regulating congressional elections may be enacted not only by a state’s actual legislature, but also directly by a state’s voters through the initiative process or public referendum, in states that allow such procedures.

The Court also has held that a legislature may delegate its authority under the Elections Clause to other entities or officials. A few states have chosen to transfer power to draw congressional district lines from their respective legislatures to non-partisan or bipartisan “independent redistricting commissions.” These states believe that such commissions can make the electoral process more fair by preventing voters from being divided into congressional districts in ways that unduly protect existing officeholders (“gerrymandering”).

 
Not in GA. The SOS changed the requiements for signature verification.
ATLANTA (AP) — President Donald Trump has wrongly claimed that Georgia election officials are unable to verify signatures on absentee ballot envelopes because of a legal settlement known as a consent decree.

Here’s a look at Trump’s claims, in a tweet on Saturday:

TRUMP: “The Consent Decree signed by the Georgia Secretary of State, with the approval of Governor @BrianKempGA, at the urging of @staceyabrams, makes it impossible to check & match signatures on ballots and envelopes, etc. They knew they were going to cheat. Must expose real signatures!”

THE FACTS: There is nothing in the consent decree that prevents Georgia election clerks from scrutinizing signatures. The legal settlement signed in March addresses accusations about a lack of statewide standards for judging signatures on absentee ballot envelopes.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, a Republican, said that not only is it entirely possible to match signatures, but that the state requires it.

When a voter requests an absentee ballot on a paper application, he or she must sign it. Election officials compare that signature to the signature in voter registration files before a ballot is sent to the voter, Raffensperger said.

When those ballots are returned, the required signature on the outer envelope is compared to signatures in the voter registration system.

This process was spelled out in detail in the consent decree, a legal settlement that was signed March 6.

A lawsuit by the Democratic Party, which led to the agreement, argued that minorities were disproportionately affected when they had their ballots rejected. Among other things, the settlement sets steps for local election officials to notify a voter -- by phone, mail or email -- in a timely fashion about problems with a signature.



The changes were made by the state election board.


The signature issue resurfaced after lawyer L. Lin Wood Jr. filed a federal lawsuit Friday questioning whether the secretary of state had the authority to require the process of signature verification outlined in the agreement.



3rd Strike Against Voter Fraud Claims Means They're Out After ...​

https://sos.ga.gov › news › 3rd-strike-against-voter-frau...




Dec 29, 2020 — (Atlanta) -- After a hand recount and a subsequent machine recount requested by the Trump campaign, a signature audit has again affirmed the ...

(Atlanta) -- After a hand recount and a subsequent machine recount requested by the Trump campaign, a signature audit has again affirmed the original outcome of the November 2020 presidential race in Georgia. A signature match audit in Cobb County found “no fraudulent absentee ballots” and found that the Cobb County Elections Department had “a 99.99% accuracy rate in performing correct signature verification procedures.”
 
This is so weird. I've said it many times: Prove it in court, and I'm in. No problem.

But all they do is "prove" it to each other, inside their world, with their pollsters and their media.

We're supposed to just mindlessly and obediently buy into this stuff like they do.
I too can feelz da troof.
 
This is so weird. I've said it many times: Prove it in court, and I'm in. No problem.

But all they do is "prove" it to each other, inside their world, with their pollsters and their media.

We're supposed to just mindlessly and obediently buy into this stuff like they do.
 

Forum List

Back
Top