58% say Biden should tell prosecutors to back off Trump. What say you?

Biden should tell prosecutors to back off Trump

  • Yes

  • No


Results are only viewable after voting.
Oh fuck off, you incredulous rube hack

You think that Wade billed for 24 hours to the WH Council's office, because they were talking about their fantasy football teams?
You forgot that what you are tasked with proving is that biden is directing the prosecutions.

Your shit brained fantasies don't cut it.

By the way genius, that wasn't twenty four hours of meetings.
 
Last edited:
Oh fuck off, you incredulous rube hack

You think that Wade billed for 24 hours to the WH Council's office, because they were talking about their fantasy football teams?

I don't know what they discussed and unlike you I don't just make it up.

Even if they did discuss the case it wouldn't be nescessarily inappropriate. WH Council could ask Wade about prosecution's theory of the case for example and that would not be interference.

So again, if you have any good evidence that any of these cases were somehow artificially manufactured by Biden lets have it. You really are not bringing up anything even half-way convincing.
 
Oh fuck off, you incredulous rube hack...."Attending meetings" doesn't generate billable hours.

You think that Wade billed for 24 hours to the WH Council's office, because they were talking about their fantasy football teams?
You dumb Bingo. Wade admitted to meeting them in court. You know why? Because it isn't illegal or a conspiracy. He went to the white house council to see if they had any evidence that would help their case because that's also not illegal you morons. What kind of illegal coordination are you accusing Biden of?
 
Very few leftists, even the more intelligent ones who know better, will say that Biden had anything to do with initiating Trump prosecutions.
What is the evidence that he did?

Is it just because you say so?
 
We let politicians inside trade and make millions. We pay for their sexual abuse. But we fine the fat man half a billion for a victimless crime?
Seriously?
Not sure what you mean by ”let”, we have prosecuted members of Congress for insider trading. Successful prosecution is not easy. Members of Congress are entitled to the same standards as anyone else in the justice system.
 
If Biden was confident he could beat Trump in the election, none of this would be happening.
 
You dumb Bingo. Wade admitted to meeting them in court. You know why? Because it isn't illegal or a conspiracy. He went to the white house council to see if they had any evidence that would help their case because that's also not illegal you morons. What kind of illegal coordination are you accusing Biden of?
Bongo. Jerk Chicken conveniently dismisses the meeting.

The fact is: we all know what was discussed. And why. We also know there wouldn’t be any other topic to discuss with Wade.

Denying reality, Jerk, isn’t a good look for you. It may be your only look. But really, terrible optics.
 
I don't know what they discussed and unlike you I don't just make it up.

Even if they did discuss the case it wouldn't be nescessarily inappropriate. WH Council could ask Wade about prosecution's theory of the case for example and that would not be interference.

So again, if you have any good evidence that any of these cases were somehow artificially manufactured by Biden lets have it. You really are not bringing up anything even half-way convincing.
You dumb Bingo. Wade admitted to meeting them in court. You know why? Because it isn't illegal or a conspiracy. He went to the white house council to see if they had any evidence that would help their case because that's also not illegal you morons. What kind of illegal coordination are you accusing Biden of?
The willful suspension of disbelief, because they're on my team.

You clowns prolly believe that pro rasslin' story lines are legit too.

Fuck you rube hacks.
 
I didn't read this entire thread because the OP is seriously inane. Anyone with the slightest bit of knowledge of how our federal government works would know that President Biden, or any president for that matter, has no control over what state attorneys prosecute under state law.
 
Last edited:
Oh fuck off, you incredulous rube hack...."Attending meetings" doesn't generate billable hours.

You think that Wade billed for 24 hours to the WH Council's office, because they were talking about their fantasy football teams?
Your allegation has no legs. Give the evidence that links the two to hid criminal liability. You can't because it has not been proven, and imho will never be proven.
 
Bongo. Jerk Chicken conveniently dismisses the meeting.

The fact is: we all know what was discussed. And why. We also know there wouldn’t be any other topic to discuss with Wade.
No you don't. You imagine it like the bitch cosplayer that you are.
Denying reality, Jerk, isn’t a good look for you. It may be your only look. But really, terrible optics.
Then what's the reality? In what way did Biden illegal coordinate these indictments? Did they manufacture evidence? Make up witness statements? What? What exactly do you have evidence of?
 
Your allegation has no legs. Give the evidence that links the two to hid criminal liability. You can't because it has not been proven, and imho will never be proven.
You all have lots of theory but nothing evidential.
 
The president should not violate the independence of the DoJ. Biden has not done so and I have complete confidence that he will keep it that way. Trump did when he was president and has promised to do it again.
So you've never heard Biden comment about Trump's guilt? Have you never listened to him?
 
In a recent McLaughlin Group poll, 58% say Biden should tell prosecutors to back off Trump.

56% of those polled say Biden wants Trump jailed before the election.

What say you?

(You can change your vote if any discussion changes your mind.)

PATRIOTS please vote.
My reply is yes, but communists have to do what communists have to do.

But one thing is for certain, if Trump gets in, revenge is "HIGH" on his to-do list.
 
Your allegation has no legs. Give the evidence that links the two to hid criminal liability. You can't because it has not been proven, and imho will never be proven.
The local prosecutor contemplating some criminal case against the former (Republican) President of the United States has a confab with the present (Democrat) President’s DOJ.

WHAT on Earth could they possibly be discussing? The Yankee’s prospects? The weather in Guyana? A road rage incident in the home jurisdiction of that local prosecutor? Or, just possibly, could they be talking about the only thing of mutual interest to them?

Hm. Real poser, that riddle.
 

Forum List

Back
Top