Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More proof that the far left is running on propaganda and talking points and they want the gay "Marriages" to have special privileges that other "Marriages" do not.
And what 'special privileges' are you referring to that the 'far left' wants to gay marriages to have that other marriages do not? And by all means, be specific.
Perfect example of how this is more about revenge than any actual claim to "rights" or "equality".
How is equal protection under the law 'revenge'? And who, pray tell, is it 'revenge' against?
And the far left once again shows they would much rather force the government to dictate every aspect ones life.
And for the 3rd time, how does legally recognizing gay marriage mean that 'government dictates every aspect of one's life'. You seem a little vague on how that works.
The far left just loves to make up rights and protects that do not exist.
You say marriage isn't a right. The Supreme Court disagrees. Thus, marriage is a legally recognized and legally protected right, regardless of what you believe.
Tyranny is forcing children into homosexual homes against their wishes or knowledge. Marriage Equality encompasses this thoughtless crime against children.Homosexual's have a right to deny children, a Mother or Father?
As much as any single parent.
Marriage Equality is a violation of Children's rights. Homosexuals have no right to deny children a Mother and Father,
Since no marriage requires children or the ability to have them, how are children relevant to the validity of any marriage? Surely no straight couple is held to that standard. No single parent is. Why then would we apply it to gays.....and exclusively?
Of all the problems in the world, the idea of forcing children into a government designed homosexual family is healthy is just plane old tyranny.
I don't think tyranny means what you think it means.
Of course not, because you ignore the several states that voted against gay marriage (many millions of voters and thus more people) who just got the rug pulled out from under them based on this abdication of the rule of constitutional law. It is really a simple matter, and it matter not what one thinks of gay marriage....what just happened is much bigger than that.
Most folks are too occupied with their cell phones to understand or care about such implications. I'm not one of those people.
Yes! Yes! we know that the gays want special privileges and not "equality", you have made that abundantly clear.
Tyranny is forcing children into homosexual homes against their wishes or knowledge.
Marriage Equality encompasses this thoughtless crime against children.
Yes! Yes! we know that the gays want special privileges and not "equality", you have made that abundantly clear.
What 'special privileges'? You never could answer that question.
The ones you cited as being an automatic on being "Married" minus the Social Security. Typical far left.
The ones you cited as being an automatic on being "Married" minus the Social Security. Typical far left.
Who is 'automatically married' minus social security?
Wow the far left true is dense. Makes a list of things that are automatic upon "Marriage" then diverts from that posting.
Wow the far left true is dense. Makes a list of things that are automatic upon "Marriage" then diverts from that posting.
So....who are you referring to that are 'automatically married minus social security'? If you don't know, just say so.
nce again the far left deflects as that is not what is written. Also shows that they want gays to have special privileges from an outdated list they supplied.
I don't wish to discuss when the breakdown of communication began. My points are almost always verbatim, no need to read into or between the lines.
I stated clearly (hopefully in this thread, I'm involved in so many, don't have time to re-read each) that the Supreme Court just over-road the opinion of the vast majority of the citizens of those states, thus by default making a progressive court case the law of the land. Libs celebrate the minor battle, while oblivious to the loss of the greater war. In case that was not clear, the war against federalism and individual rights. Citizens and the Constitution be damned, they were hell bent on advocating a progressive agenda. 5 of 9 unelected black robes taking an activist, rather than their prescribed constitutional, obligation. THAT was my point (here and/or elsewhere).
Please discuss with civility. Thank you.
Marriage Equality is child abuse, Homosexuals have no right to deny children a mother, a father, or both.
nce again the far left deflects as that is not what is written. Also shows that they want gays to have special privileges from an outdated list they supplied.
So even you don't know who you're referring to with 'automatically married minus social security'? Ending your silly 'special privileges' argument in its tracks.
You have yet to offer a single valid reason why gays and lesbians should be denied legal recognition of their marriages. I wouldn't hold your breath, as there is no reason. Its just an arbitrary abrogation of their right to marry.
And deny as you will, marriage is a legally recognized and legally protected right.
Homosexual's have a right to deny children, a Mother or Father?
Marriage Equality is a violation of Children's rights. Homosexuals have no right to deny children a Mother and Father,
Of all the problems in the world, the idea of forcing children into a government designed homosexual family is healthy is just plane old tyranny.
We must save our children from this sickness.
I don't wish to discuss when the breakdown of communication began. My points are almost always verbatim, no need to read into or between the lines.
I stated clearly (hopefully in this thread, I'm involved in so many, don't have time to re-read each) that the Supreme Court just over-road the opinion of the vast majority of the citizens of those states, thus by default making a progressive court case the law of the land. Libs celebrate the minor battle, while oblivious to the loss of the greater war. In case that was not clear, the war against federalism and individual rights. Citizens and the Constitution be damned, they were hell bent on advocating a progressive agenda. 5 of 9 unelected black robes taking an activist, rather than their prescribed constitutional, obligation. THAT was my point (here and/or elsewhere).
Please discuss with civility. Thank you.
Well you're saying the Supreme Court is overriding the wishes of the people.
Yet surely the Bill of Rights and Constitution has been the wishes of the people for much longer.
If the people want the BoRs and yet vote for a law which is unconstitutional, you can't say the Supreme Court is making law. It's not.
So the people need to choose. The Constitution with all the rights that come with it, or banning gay marriage.
It's short termism v. long termism.
Why do liberals like to celebrate that the Constitution and Bill of Rights are being upheld? Why do conservatives get pissed when the Constitution and Bill of Rights get upheld when they're so quick to claim they support both?
Yes! Yes! We know you want gay to have special privileges that other do not have a revenge.
And another far left poster blazes in with far left propaganda and once again demonstrates the far left does not understand the Constitution.
nce again the far left deflects as that is not what is written. Also shows that they want gays to have special privileges from an outdated list they supplied.
So even you don't know who you're referring to with 'automatically married minus social security'? Ending your silly 'special privileges' argument in its tracks.
You have yet to offer a single valid reason why gays and lesbians should be denied legal recognition of their marriages. I wouldn't hold your breath, as there is no reason. Its just an arbitrary abrogation of their right to marry.
And deny as you will, marriage is a legally recognized and legally protected right.
Yes! Yes! We know you want gay to have special privileges that other do not have a revenge.
And once again the far left trying to make a pointless point (using far left propaganda) over something they do not understand.
Yes! Yes! We know you want gay to have special privileges that other do not have a revenge.
What special privileges? And possessed by whom?
Those two simple questions....and your entire silly argument collapses into meaningless flotsam.
And you still can't provide a single valid reason to deny gays and lesbians the right to marry. And yes, it is a legally recognized and legally protected right....as defined by the USSC.
