68% of Americans favor Obama's talks with Iran

[Stephanie]

People are tired of the Repubs one-sided, "shoot first and ask questions later" (pay for it later as well ) approach to foreign policy

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

"was about the same" Weak come back.

The turn-out for the last election, that you are banging your rw drum about saying was a landslide, was the lowest turnout since WWII. Chew on that hackboi

Ahahaha dude is your argument seriously that Obama could not rally your side to the polls? That liberals are a bunch of lazy retards who couldn't be bothered to vote? I mean what exactly is your excuse? lmao! Liberals got obliterated and not just at the national level but at the state and local level and even in some reliably liberal states. That's quite the bitch slapping voters have given you these past 6 years. And if Obama can't get your side to the polls you think Hillary can? AHAHAHAHAHAHA!

They won't admit the majority of Democrat voters were as sick of Obama as the rest of the country. that why they didn't show. I think all the rabid Obots are all on this site...lol

 

[ScienceRocks]

Talking to Iran is like talking to North Korea. Ask yourself, has that ever done anything?

 

[Stephanie]

A CNN POLL

no kidding. one step above PmsNBC

 

[mikegriffith1]

13. Do you favor or oppose direct diplomatic negotiations between the U.S. and Iran in an attempt to
prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons? March 13-15th, 2015

Favor: 68%
Oppose: 29%
No opinion: 4%

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2015/images/03/16/iran.poll.pdf

So 68% of people favor the president's administration doing SOMETHING with Iran in regards to diplomacy and Nuclear weapons.....and the GOP is all enthralled with dummy Cotton's letter telling Iran to piss off about any deal.

False. Most Republicans do not object to talking with Iran per se, but they certainly oppose the feckless, dangerous, and naive manner in which Obama and Kerry are handling the negotiations.

 

[Nyvin]

13. Do you favor or oppose direct diplomatic negotiations between the U.S. and Iran in an attempt to
prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons? March 13-15th, 2015

Favor: 68%
Oppose: 29%
No opinion: 4%

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2015/images/03/16/iran.poll.pdf

So 68% of people favor the president's administration doing SOMETHING with Iran in regards to diplomacy and Nuclear weapons.....and the GOP is all enthralled with dummy Cotton's letter telling Iran to piss off about any deal.

False. Most Republicans do not object to talking with Iran per se, but they certainly oppose the feckless, dangerous, and naive manner in which Obama and Kerry are handling the negotiations.

You have no idea how the negotiations are being handled, because no one does yet. Stop talking out of your ass.

 

[chikenwing]

People are tired of the Repubs one-sided, "shoot first and ask questions later" (pay for it later as well ) approach to foreign policy

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

"was about the same" Weak come back.

The turn-out for the last election, that you are banging your rw drum about saying was a landslide, was the lowest turnout since WWII. Chew on that hackboi

Whats weak is the attempt to put way more meaning to the numbers.
What is the reality? who has what seats?and start at the state level counting those lost seats

 

[Dot Com]

People are tired of the Repubs one-sided, "shoot first and ask questions later" (pay for it later as well ) approach to foreign policy

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

"was about the same" Weak come back.

The turn-out for the last election, that you are banging your rw drum about saying was a landslide, was the lowest turnout since WWII. Chew on that hackboi

Whats weak is the attempt to put way more meaning to the numbers.
What is the reality? who has what seats?and start at the state level counting those lost seats

Stop treading water. Your *cough* "resounding victory" was a result of most people not caring what either party of the duopoly had to offer.

 

[chikenwing]

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

"was about the same" Weak come back.

The turn-out for the last election, that you are banging your rw drum about saying was a landslide, was the lowest turnout since WWII. Chew on that hackboi

Whats weak is the attempt to put way more meaning to the numbers.
What is the reality? who has what seats?and start at the state level counting those lost seats

Stop treading water. Your *cough* "resounding victory" was a result of most people not caring what either party of the duopoly had to offer.

Cough cough,whats the reality? sucks bad doesn't it?

 

[Antares]

Too funny, the majority of American's are against the Dream Act and the ACA but you guy's don't think that those count.

 

[Dot Com]

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

"was about the same" Weak come back.

The turn-out for the last election, that you are banging your rw drum about saying was a landslide, was the lowest turnout since WWII. Chew on that hackboi

Whats weak is the attempt to put way more meaning to the numbers.
What is the reality? who has what seats?and start at the state level counting those lost seats

Stop treading water. Your *cough* "resounding victory" was a result of most people not caring what either party of the duopoly had to offer.

Cough cough,whats the reality? sucks bad doesn't it?

your debating defeat is

 

[The Rabbi]

Let me phrase the question and I'll give you the answers you want.
1) Do you favor an agreement that allows Iran to continue to enrich uranium and possibly develop a nuclear bomb within 5 years?
Let's see how that works.

 

[chikenwing]

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

"was about the same" Weak come back.

The turn-out for the last election, that you are banging your rw drum about saying was a landslide, was the lowest turnout since WWII. Chew on that hackboi

Whats weak is the attempt to put way more meaning to the numbers.
What is the reality? who has what seats?and start at the state level counting those lost seats

Stop treading water. Your *cough* "resounding victory" was a result of most people not caring what either party of the duopoly had to offer.

Cough cough,whats the reality? sucks bad doesn't it?

your debating defeat is

What debate you refuse to address the fact that Dems lost big,playing pattie cake with voter numbers doesn't change the reality,well for you it might,but rational people understand a W is a W.
keep trying

 

[g5000]

No they don't, did you miss the bi-partisan applause in Congress when Bibi spoke?

I had no idea the entire country was in the room!

 

[kiwiman127]

People are tired of the Repubs one-sided, "shoot first and ask questions later" (pay for it later as well ) approach to foreign policy

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

Voter turnout in 2006 was 41.3 percent of eligible voters.
Voter turnout in 2014 was 36.4 percent of eligible voters. The lowest turnout in 72 years.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

People are tired of the Repubs one-sided, "shoot first and ask questions later" (pay for it later as well ) approach to foreign policy

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

Voter turnout in 2006 was 41.3 percent of eligible voters.
Voter turnout in 2014 was 36.4 percent of eligible voters. The lowest turnout in 72 years.

Which indicates that 2014 was in no way 'representative' of the Nation as a whole, where republicans are only fooling themselves if they think 2014 'portends' 2016.

 

[chikenwing]

People are tired of the Repubs one-sided, "shoot first and ask questions later" (pay for it later as well ) approach to foreign policy

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

Voter turnout in 2006 was 41.3 percent of eligible voters.
Voter turnout in 2014 was 36.4 percent of eligible voters. The lowest turnout in 72 years.

Which indicates that 2014 was in no way 'representative' of the Nation as a whole, where republicans are only fooling themselves if they think 2014 'portends' 2016.

It most certainly does,Dems couldn't be bothered,who's fault is that? and Repubs did,it represents the county completely.
Whats next you going to claim it was done as a protest? that Dems would give up state houses,governorships the senate,and very likely the White house to prove a point?
Reality escapes everyone of you excuse makers.

 

[BluesLegend]

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

"was about the same" Weak come back.

The turn-out for the last election, that you are banging your rw drum about saying was a landslide, was the lowest turnout since WWII. Chew on that hackboi

Ahahaha dude is your argument seriously that Obama could not rally your side to the polls? That liberals are a bunch of lazy retards who couldn't be bothered to vote? I mean what exactly is your excuse? lmao! Liberals got obliterated and not just at the national level but at the state and local level and even in some reliably liberal states. That's quite the bitch slapping voters have given you these past 6 years. And if Obama can't get your side to the polls you think Hillary can? AHAHAHAHAHAHA!

They won't admit the majority of Democrat voters were as sick of Obama as the rest of the country. that why they didn't show. I think all the rabid Obots are all on this site...lol

Obama lied his way to victory in 2012, THAT'S what happened and why the Democrats got their asses kicked in 2014 once his lies became obvious.

 

[BluesLegend]

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

"was about the same" Weak come back.

The turn-out for the last election, that you are banging your rw drum about saying was a landslide, was the lowest turnout since WWII. Chew on that hackboi

Whats weak is the attempt to put way more meaning to the numbers.
What is the reality? who has what seats?and start at the state level counting those lost seats

Stop treading water. Your *cough* "resounding victory" was a result of most people not caring what either party of the duopoly had to offer.

Ahahaha riiiiight that's why it was such a lopsided defeat for Democrats. lol Parrot the talking points if you want to, go hide under your bed and pretend America supports liberals in spite of 3 national elections is a row to the contrary. The left my friends, are unhinged!

 

[BluesLegend]

People are tired of the Repubs one-sided, "shoot first and ask questions later" (pay for it later as well ) approach to foreign policy

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

Voter turnout in 2006 was 41.3 percent of eligible voters.
Voter turnout in 2014 was 36.4 percent of eligible voters. The lowest turnout in 72 years.

Wow almost 4 whole points difference holy shit man /SARCASM

So why didn't more people turn out to support Democrats? Why was Obama as popular as a case of hemorrhoids on the campaign trail? Why were Democrats not running on their biggest accomplishment in decades Obamacare? Why were Democrats upset they had to explain Obama's lies to their local districts? Nothing to say? LOL

 

[BluesLegend]

People are tired of the Repubs one-sided, "shoot first and ask questions later" (pay for it later as well ) approach to foreign policy

Is that why the people bitch slapped Democrats just last November in an historic ass whooping so epic you have to go all the way back to 1921 to find this few Democrats in congress? Its just hilarious watching you libs disconnect from reality. Go ahead explain the people rejecting liberals and their dumb as policies if you can. lol

"historic" in that it was the lowest voter turnout since WW II. Disingenuous much?

Voter turnout was about the same as in 2006 when Democrats claimed their victory was a mandate from the people against Bush policies OH SNAP!!

Voter turnout in 2006 was 41.3 percent of eligible voters.
Voter turnout in 2014 was 36.4 percent of eligible voters. The lowest turnout in 72 years.

Which indicates that 2014 was in no way 'representative' of the Nation as a whole, where republicans are only fooling themselves if they think 2014 'portends' 2016.

First, you utterly fail at analytics. That said what makes you think the bitch slapping you took wouldn't have been even worse had more voters turned out?