Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 124,512
- 83,408
- 2,635
They saved the money...No, you raging cuck, I DID go to your link. That's how I know it said nothing about trying to influence an election, as you moronically claimed.Nothing in that report states the money was used to overthrow Netanyahu. And how could it since there were no elections scheduled when the money was given. Netanyahu called for an election in December, 2014, after the money was given to OneVoice."Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."
![]()
Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel
Here is the Senate report you stupid fuck
Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee
Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu
11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT
Netanyahu Fires Ministers and Calls for Elections
Dayam, you rightards are idiots. Even basic common sense eludes you.
You refuse to go to that link huh cock sucker?
OK I will argue it again
From politico
Senate report: State Dept. grant also aided campaign to unseat Netanyahu
![]()
The report found no wrongdoing by the State Department. | AP Photo/Oded Balilty, File
Senate report: State Dept. grant also aided campaign to unseat Netanyahu
By BURGESS EVERETT
07/12/2016 11:49 AM EDT
Updated 07/12/2016 12:23 PM EDT
A State Department grant intended to rally support for peace between Israel and Palestine also helped set up political infrastructure that was later used for a campaign opposing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2015, according to a bipartisan Senate investigative report released on Tuesday.
The report found no legal wrongdoing by the State Department, since the $349,000 in grants for OneVoice were used to further the Middle East process as intended. But shortly after Netanyahu called an election for 2015, the voter databases constructed with the grant money were activated for Victory 15, an unsuccessful effort to defeat Netanyahu.
Story Continued Below
Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) each signed off on the investigation, which was conducted by Portman’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. In releasing the report, Portman criticized the State Department for lax oversight and for undermining a U.S. ally.
“The State Department ignored warning signs and funded a politically active group in a politically sensitive environment with inadequate safeguards,” Portman said. “It is completely unacceptable that U.S. taxpayer dollars were used to build a political campaign infrastructure that was deployed — immediately after the grant ended — against the leader of our closest ally in the Middle East.”
The investigation is notable for its bipartisan sheen. McCaskill highlighted the conclusion that it showed “no wrongdoing” by President Barack Obama’s administration but said the report “certainly highlights deficiencies in the Department’s policies that should be addressed in order to best protect taxpayer dollars.”
.
You do understand that your own link failed to corroborate your insane claim, don't you?
Because there was no election scheduled when the money was given.
They saved the money and used it like they do in the States to build up a data base, contacts grass roots shit.and handed it off to V15..
They doesn't ring a bell?
And again
President Obama “can’t say he has businesslike relationship [with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu] or that it isn’t personal when his entire political machine, virtually some of the top people, were in Israel, on the ground, trying to defeat Netanyahu, which is unprecedented. …From Jeremy Bird down to others who were deeply and intricately involved in his campaigns in the past, he sent them down there to start to equivalent of a Super PAC to try to oust Netanyahu.”
–Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), radio interview with Hugh Hewitt, March 24, 2015
.
LOLOLOL
Imbecile.... you said Obama funneled money "in the election."
Now you say he didn't, that they "saved the money" for the election; meaning, Obama did not give money to influence an election.
You're actually calling yourself an imbecile at this point by saying Obama didn't give money to influence an election after posting for pages that he did.
See now why everyone here agrees with that sentiment, even you.