7 reasons why liberals are incapable of understanding the world

[Wyatt earp]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Here is the Senate report you stupid fuck



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

Your assertions are LIES. Obama did not fund a campaign to unseat Netanyahu, nor did he "meddle" in the Israeli elections.

The State Department funded peace efforts and negotiations. When the negotiations collapsed, the NGO used the funds for other purposes, but your post and the blog connected to it implied that Obama tried to get rid of Netanyahu which is "Mostly False".

It's like giving your teenager $30 to go get a pizza, and instead the kid buys liquor with the money. Are you guilty of giving your underage kid liquor?

Proving point one in the OP. You are unaware of the truth and refuse to accept it, when provided.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Apparently republicans are extremely mentally disordered. According to "bear" they vote for liberals all the time and don't even realize it.

Did you even think about this when you vote?

.

 

[Flash]

6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility.

This is the probably the biggest stupidity of the Liberals. They use the contempt of personal responsibility as justification for the filthy greedy welfare state. It is never their responsibility. Their plight in life is always the fault of somebody else so they justify the thievery of socialism.

 

[Flash]

Liberals get it wrong on just about every issue. It doesn't make any difference what the issue is the Liberals will have a convoluted idea of the solution. That is why they get so much ridicule and have no credibility.

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

 

[mamooth]

6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility.

Such fine projection.

Has any conservative here ever once in their lives taken responsibility for the catastrophic failure of every conservative policy? For example, do you see any of them taking responsibility for Trump's epic screwups?

No. They deny, deflect, call it fake news, blame their own messes on liberals. Evading responsibility is the entire reason for being a conservative. Once you declare yourself "conservative", you're given a permanent free pass to evade all personal responsibility. For the rest of your life, every single thing will always be someone else's fault. You'll get to sit on your ass, do nothing, cry a lot, and claim the moral high ground. The emotional lure of that conservative victimhood cult is irresistible to weak and immoral minds.

 

[12icer]

They don't have ANY failing policies, they learn from real history, and do not repeat the devastating failures that liberals initiate.

 

[Faun]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

I just cut to the chase and start insulting and ridiculing them. Debating them is pointless.

I know these guys are so retarded like that John kosh dude above, the thread was about did Obama meddle in Israels election of course he did, but this idiot wants to move the goal post to an irrelevant answer.



.

You're fucking deranged.

How did Obama meddle in an election that wasn't scheduled until after the money was given?

Again you fucking asshole moron did you read the god damn report ?


.

Of course I read it. That's how I know it says nothing about trying to influence an election. And again, how could it since there was no election scheduled at the time the money was given?

It also states there was nothing wrong with giving the money.

You're just a fucking imbecile conservative.

 

[Wyatt earp]

6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility.

Such fine projection.

Has any conservative here ever once in their lives taken responsibility for the catastrophic failure of every conservative policy? For example, do you see any of them taking responsibility for Trump's epic screwups?

No. They deny, deflect, call it fake news, blame their own messes on liberals. Evading responsibility is the entire reason for being a conservative. Once you declare yourself "conservative", you're given a permanent free pass to evade all personal responsibility. For the rest of your life, every single thing will always be someone else's fault. You'll get to sit on your ass, do nothing, cry a lot, and claim the moral high ground. The emotional lure of that conservative victimhood cult is irresistible to weak and immoral minds.

failure of every conservative policy? For example, do you see any of them taking responsibility for Trump's epic screwups

What Trump screw ups? He is fighting everyone and learning as he goes, he is not a career politician

 

[postman]

6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility.

Their plight in life is always the fault of somebody else ...

You mean like the way Trump blames everything on Obama.

Someone tapped my phone - Obama
Healthcare costs - Obama
Iran - Obama
North Korea - Obama

 

[postman]

For instance, on the issue of economics the stupid Liberals think the solution is higher taxation, more deficit spending and taking money away from the people that earned it and giving it away to the special interest groups that didn't earn the money. How convoluted is that?

Liberals do 'tax and spend' , but at least they balance the budget. Republicans did 'borrow and spend' and like Reagan and Bush, tripled and doubled the national debt. For people like you, it means they left debts three times, and two times the size they inherited.

 

[postman]

failure of every conservative policy? For example, do you see any of them taking responsibility for Trump's epic screwups

What Trump screw ups? He is fighting everyone and learning as he goes, he is not a career politician

You have to be kidding, right?

 

[Iceweasel]

No. They deny, deflect, call it fake news, blame their own messes on liberals. Evading responsibility is the entire reason for being a conservative.

You are the perpetual sound of one hand clapping.

 

[Wyatt earp]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

I just cut to the chase and start insulting and ridiculing them. Debating them is pointless.

I know these guys are so retarded like that John kosh dude above, the thread was about did Obama meddle in Israels election of course he did, but this idiot wants to move the goal post to an irrelevant answer.



.

You're fucking deranged.

How did Obama meddle in an election that wasn't scheduled until after the money was given?

Again you fucking asshole moron did you read the god damn report ?


.

Of course I read it. That's how I know it says nothing about trying to influence an election. And again, how could it since there was no election scheduled at the time the money was given?

It also states there was nothing wrong with giving the money.

You're just a fucking imbecile conservative.

Yes there was , it's illegal to use tax payer money to influence a foreign election and they found away around it.

But again that's not what the argument was about, the argument was did Obama and his hence man meddle in Israels election.


Their is no doubt that he did. We all know he was siding more with the Palestine



We seen it

The issue returned to the headlines when the United Nations Security Council recently voted 14 to 0 to condemn Israeli settlements. The United States, which often vetoes resolutions critical of Israel, abstained and allowed the resolution to pass.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded angrily, unleashing a stream of accusations against the Obama administration. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry defended the U.S. position Wednesday in a lengthy speech that repeatedly admonished Israel over settlements.



.

 

[postman]

No. They deny, deflect, call it fake news, blame their own messes on liberals. Evading responsibility is the entire reason for being a conservative.

You are the perpetual sound of one hand clapping.

How many times have we heard Trump and the white house use the term 'fake news' when it came to real news. Like that Michael Flynn talked sanctions with the Russian ambassador.

 

[Wyatt earp]

failure of every conservative policy? For example, do you see any of them taking responsibility for Trump's epic screwups

What Trump screw ups? He is fighting everyone and learning as he goes, he is not a career politician

You have to be kidding, right?

Which ones and if you say the Yahoo 9th circuit court and eric holder get off my thread


.

 

[Iceweasel]

6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility.

Their plight in life is always the fault of somebody else ...

You mean like the way Trump blames everything on Obama.

Someone tapped my phone - Obama
Healthcare costs - Obama
Iran - Obama
North Korea - Obama

Obama screwed up everything he touched but Trump has said all along we've been doing it wrong for a long time. Said Iraq was a mistake, trade deals, the weak border, etc. Maybe it's not you're fault you're clueless?

 

[Iceweasel]

No. They deny, deflect, call it fake news, blame their own messes on liberals. Evading responsibility is the entire reason for being a conservative.

You are the perpetual sound of one hand clapping.

How many times have we heard Trump and the white house use the term 'fake news' when it came to real news. Like that Michael Flynn talked sanctions with the Russian ambassador.

That's real news? Go ahead and prove it, genius.

 

[Wyatt earp]

No. They deny, deflect, call it fake news, blame their own messes on liberals. Evading responsibility is the entire reason for being a conservative.

You are the perpetual sound of one hand clapping.

How many times have we heard Trump and the white house use the term 'fake news' when it came to real news. Like that Michael Flynn talked sanctions with the Russian ambassador.

We still have the he sanctions in place and flynn was fired....


.

 

[postman]

Yes there was , it's illegal to use tax payer money to influence a foreign election and they found away around it.

But again that's not what the argument was about, the argument was did Obama and his hence man meddle in Israels election.

Their is no doubt that he did. We all know he was siding more with the Palestine

We seen it

The issue returned to the headlines when the United Nations Security Council recently voted 14 to 0 to condemn Israeli settlements. The United States, which often vetoes resolutions critical of Israel, abstained and allowed the resolution to pass.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu responded angrily, unleashing a stream of accusations against the Obama administration. U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry defended the U.S. position Wednesday in a lengthy speech that repeatedly admonished Israel over settlements.
.

Occasionally the permanent members have to stand up, and allow a vote to go through, instead of automatically vetoing resolutions. It's the road to getting something done, so people don't condemn the UN as totally useless.

 

[Faun]

) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.


^^^ tell me about that one I had to argue with a liberal today for 6 hours and 15 pages to prove he was lying and Obama did in fact meddle in Israels election

Rep. Elijah Cummings hits Obama while putting his foot in his mouth


.

.

"Obama has been sending taxpayer dollars, at least $350,000 to fund anti-Likud, anti-Netanyahu groups in Israel for (the) election."

Blog claims U.S. funded anti-Netanyahu election effort in Israel

Here is the Senate report you stupid fuck



Majority Media | Media | Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs Committee







Senate Report: State Department Funded Effort to Overthrow Netanyahu

11:27 AM, JUL 12, 2016 | By JIM SWIFT

Nothing in that report states the money was used to overthrow Netanyahu. And how could it since there were no elections scheduled when the money was given. Netanyahu called for an election in December, 2014, after the money was given to OneVoice.

Netanyahu Fires Ministers and Calls for Elections

Dayam, you rightards are idiots. Even basic common sense eludes you.

You refuse to go to that link huh cock sucker?


OK I will argue it again


From politico


Senate report: State Dept. grant also aided campaign to unseat Netanyahu



Facebook

• Twitter

• Google +

• Email
• Comment
• Print

The report found no wrongdoing by the State Department. | AP Photo/Oded Balilty, File

Senate report: State Dept. grant also aided campaign to unseat Netanyahu
By BURGESS EVERETT

07/12/2016 11:49 AM EDT


Updated 07/12/2016 12:23 PM EDT

A State Department grant intended to rally support for peace between Israel and Palestine also helped set up political infrastructure that was later used for a campaign opposing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in 2015, according to a bipartisan Senate investigative report released on Tuesday.

The report found no legal wrongdoing by the State Department, since the $349,000 in grants for OneVoice were used to further the Middle East process as intended. But shortly after Netanyahu called an election for 2015, the voter databases constructed with the grant money were activated for Victory 15, an unsuccessful effort to defeat Netanyahu.

Story Continued Below

Sens. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) each signed off on the investigation, which was conducted by Portman’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations. In releasing the report, Portman criticized the State Department for lax oversight and for undermining a U.S. ally.

“The State Department ignored warning signs and funded a politically active group in a politically sensitive environment with inadequate safeguards,” Portman said. “It is completely unacceptable that U.S. taxpayer dollars were used to build a political campaign infrastructure that was deployed — immediately after the grant ended — against the leader of our closest ally in the Middle East.”

The investigation is notable for its bipartisan sheen. McCaskill highlighted the conclusion that it showed “no wrongdoing” by President Barack Obama’s administration but said the report “certainly highlights deficiencies in the Department’s policies that should be addressed in order to best protect taxpayer dollars.”



.

No, you raging cuck, I DID go to your link. That's how I know it said nothing about trying to influence an election, as you moronically claimed.

You do understand that your own link failed to corroborate your insane claim, don't you?

Spoiler: Why your insane claim is insane?

Because there was no election scheduled when the money was given.

 

[postman]

How many times have we heard Trump and the white house use the term 'fake news' when it came to real news. Like that Michael Flynn talked sanctions with the Russian ambassador.

That's real news? Go ahead and prove it, genius.

It can be proved by how loud conservatives yell about "unmasking". It means the phone call was real, the transcripts are real, and the conservative outrage was really really really real. But it also means the news was real.