8 Reasons The Senate Must Reject Jeff Sessions

The usual asswipes making fools of themselves at the Sessions confirmation....

Liberal losers Never tire of embarrassing themselves......circus freaks
 
You do realize that both houses throw in all kinds of attachments to bad legislation, then when someone voted against THAT bad legislation, their opponents make the claim they are against the myriad of other things that were attached instead of voting against the bad legislation.
They have been doing this for years.
 
The positions and policies he has supported do not uplift America’s shared values of love, justice and mercy.

On Capitol Hill this week, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold confirmation hearings to consider the first of Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations, Sen. Jefferson B. Sessions of Alabama. 26 years ago, this same committee denied Sessions a recommendation for the federal bench. “Most of Reagan’s judicial appointments have been people with impressive credentials regardless of their ideologies,” the editors of the LA Times wrote. “Sessions is a different story.”

The Senate refused to confirm Sessions in 1986 because the testimony they heard suggested that he sided with his namesake, Jefferson Davis, over America’s commitment to equal protection under the law.

A quarter century later, the Senate must decide if Sessions has changed.

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
If the photo of Senator Sessions greeting Donald Trump’s “thank you” tour in Mobile, Alabama, alongside Southern belles in hoop skirts isn’t enough to make clear what past greatness his support of Trump hearkens back to, then the nation should listen to the question of one civil rights veteran from Alabama who asked, in the language of Scripture, “Can a leopard change his spots?”

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee citizenship, equal protection under the law, and the ballot to all Americans.

Indeed. The record is clear. Here are eight reasons why the Senate must reject Sessions.

If Jefferson B. Sessions were confirmed by the Senate in 2017, we would have have an attorney general who, as a senator:
  1. Applauded the Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, which gutted key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1865.
  2. Voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act.
  3. Voted yes on a constitutional ban of same-sex marriage.
  4. Opposed the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.”
  5. Opposed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
  6. Voted to ease restrictions on wiretapping of cell-phones.
  7. Voted to abolish a program that helps businesses owned by women and minorities compete for federally funded transportation projects.
  8. Opposed comprehensive immigration reform and nearly every immigration bill that has come before the Senate over the past two decades, including voting against a Senate resolution affirming that the United States must not bar people from the country because of their religion.
More: 8 Reasons The Senate Must Reject Jeff Sessions - Rev. Dr. William J. Barber ll

This should be more than enough to reject Sessions - again!
Your version not mine. You still don't get that you don't own dominance
 
The positions and policies he has supported do not uplift America’s shared values of love, justice and mercy.

On Capitol Hill this week, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold confirmation hearings to consider the first of Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations, Sen. Jefferson B. Sessions of Alabama. 26 years ago, this same committee denied Sessions a recommendation for the federal bench. “Most of Reagan’s judicial appointments have been people with impressive credentials regardless of their ideologies,” the editors of the LA Times wrote. “Sessions is a different story.”

The Senate refused to confirm Sessions in 1986 because the testimony they heard suggested that he sided with his namesake, Jefferson Davis, over America’s commitment to equal protection under the law.

A quarter century later, the Senate must decide if Sessions has changed.

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
If the photo of Senator Sessions greeting Donald Trump’s “thank you” tour in Mobile, Alabama, alongside Southern belles in hoop skirts isn’t enough to make clear what past greatness his support of Trump hearkens back to, then the nation should listen to the question of one civil rights veteran from Alabama who asked, in the language of Scripture, “Can a leopard change his spots?”

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee citizenship, equal protection under the law, and the ballot to all Americans.

Indeed. The record is clear. Here are eight reasons why the Senate must reject Sessions.

If Jefferson B. Sessions were confirmed by the Senate in 2017, we would have have an attorney general who, as a senator:
  1. Applauded the Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, which gutted key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1865.
  2. Voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act.
  3. Voted yes on a constitutional ban of same-sex marriage.
  4. Opposed the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.”
  5. Opposed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
  6. Voted to ease restrictions on wiretapping of cell-phones.
  7. Voted to abolish a program that helps businesses owned by women and minorities compete for federally funded transportation projects.
  8. Opposed comprehensive immigration reform and nearly every immigration bill that has come before the Senate over the past two decades, including voting against a Senate resolution affirming that the United States must not bar people from the country because of their religion.
More: 8 Reasons The Senate Must Reject Jeff Sessions - Rev. Dr. William J. Barber ll

This should be more than enough to reject Sessions - again!
:lmao:
Washington Redskin, do you enjoy sucking your own ass? For the hundredth time stay out of the fire water…
 
The positions and policies he has supported do not uplift America’s shared values of love, justice and mercy.

On Capitol Hill this week, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold confirmation hearings to consider the first of Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations, Sen. Jefferson B. Sessions of Alabama. 26 years ago, this same committee denied Sessions a recommendation for the federal bench. “Most of Reagan’s judicial appointments have been people with impressive credentials regardless of their ideologies,” the editors of the LA Times wrote. “Sessions is a different story.”

The Senate refused to confirm Sessions in 1986 because the testimony they heard suggested that he sided with his namesake, Jefferson Davis, over America’s commitment to equal protection under the law.

A quarter century later, the Senate must decide if Sessions has changed.

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
If the photo of Senator Sessions greeting Donald Trump’s “thank you” tour in Mobile, Alabama, alongside Southern belles in hoop skirts isn’t enough to make clear what past greatness his support of Trump hearkens back to, then the nation should listen to the question of one civil rights veteran from Alabama who asked, in the language of Scripture, “Can a leopard change his spots?”

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee citizenship, equal protection under the law, and the ballot to all Americans.

Indeed. The record is clear. Here are eight reasons why the Senate must reject Sessions.

If Jefferson B. Sessions were confirmed by the Senate in 2017, we would have have an attorney general who, as a senator:
  1. Applauded the Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, which gutted key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1865.
  2. Voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act.
  3. Voted yes on a constitutional ban of same-sex marriage.
  4. Opposed the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.”
  5. Opposed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
  6. Voted to ease restrictions on wiretapping of cell-phones.
  7. Voted to abolish a program that helps businesses owned by women and minorities compete for federally funded transportation projects.
  8. Opposed comprehensive immigration reform and nearly every immigration bill that has come before the Senate over the past two decades, including voting against a Senate resolution affirming that the United States must not bar people from the country because of their religion.
More: 8 Reasons The Senate Must Reject Jeff Sessions - Rev. Dr. William J. Barber ll

This should be more than enough to reject Sessions - again!

What else was in some of those bills? Also voting against thought crimes is a plus. Also you forgot to mention while a prosecutor Sessions won cases against the KKK and won an 8 million judgement against the KKK putting them out of business for all practical purposes. Then again that would run against your narrative so like the lying bottom feeder you are you missed again.
 
The positions and policies he has supported do not uplift America’s shared values of love, justice and mercy.

On Capitol Hill this week, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold confirmation hearings to consider the first of Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations, Sen. Jefferson B. Sessions of Alabama. 26 years ago, this same committee denied Sessions a recommendation for the federal bench. “Most of Reagan’s judicial appointments have been people with impressive credentials regardless of their ideologies,” the editors of the LA Times wrote. “Sessions is a different story.”

The Senate refused to confirm Sessions in 1986 because the testimony they heard suggested that he sided with his namesake, Jefferson Davis, over America’s commitment to equal protection under the law.

A quarter century later, the Senate must decide if Sessions has changed.

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
If the photo of Senator Sessions greeting Donald Trump’s “thank you” tour in Mobile, Alabama, alongside Southern belles in hoop skirts isn’t enough to make clear what past greatness his support of Trump hearkens back to, then the nation should listen to the question of one civil rights veteran from Alabama who asked, in the language of Scripture, “Can a leopard change his spots?”

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee citizenship, equal protection under the law, and the ballot to all Americans.

Indeed. The record is clear. Here are eight reasons why the Senate must reject Sessions.

If Jefferson B. Sessions were confirmed by the Senate in 2017, we would have have an attorney general who, as a senator:
  1. Applauded the Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, which gutted key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1865.
  2. Voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act.
  3. Voted yes on a constitutional ban of same-sex marriage.
  4. Opposed the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.”
  5. Opposed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
  6. Voted to ease restrictions on wiretapping of cell-phones.
  7. Voted to abolish a program that helps businesses owned by women and minorities compete for federally funded transportation projects.
  8. Opposed comprehensive immigration reform and nearly every immigration bill that has come before the Senate over the past two decades, including voting against a Senate resolution affirming that the United States must not bar people from the country because of their religion.
More: 8 Reasons The Senate Must Reject Jeff Sessions - Rev. Dr. William J. Barber ll

This should be more than enough to reject Sessions - again!


Real 8 reasons Sessions should be rejected in the world according to the person known as the BIG L-------->

1. Big L says so!

2. Big L wants it!

3. Big L is a hack!

4. Big L is afraid they are going to make Indian Casino's pay their fairshare, and only the white devil has to pay, not wampum injun!

5. Big L has found a peyote button.

6. Big L has swallowed the peyote button!

7. Big L wants Geronimo's great grandchild as AG.

8. Big L wants to live tax free as big L collects casino cash, but wants to dictate white other people in America do as they pay taxes-)

CONCLUSION------>Big L, heap big phony-baloney!:popcorn:
 
8 Reasons The Senate Must Reject Jeff Sessions

1. Hillary Lost

2. Trump Wants Him

3. The Recount Didn't Work

4. Flipping the EC Voters Didn't Work

5. Hillary Isn't Going To Be President

7. Snowflakes are bitter butt-hurt losers who want revenge

8. Snowflakes have vowed to be complete and utter Obstructionists
 
Have a hard time trying to figure out who to vote for, most seem to vote party line or what's in it for me. when there job is what's best for the country.
 
It is fairly well known that back in 1983, Jeff Sessions raped a young boy. Disgusting. This alone should disqualify him.
Link pup
This is generally accepted knowledge and does not require a link.
It needs a link little pup. I love fake news thanks

You come from fakeland land of all libturds fake news archive
You're labeling this as fake news in an attempt to censor it, but you know in your heart what that evil man did.
 
It is fairly well known that back in 1983, Jeff Sessions raped a young boy. Disgusting. This alone should disqualify him.
Link pup
This is generally accepted knowledge and does not require a link.
It needs a link little pup. I love fake news thanks

You come from fakeland land of all libturds fake news archive
You're labeling this as fake news in an attempt to censor it, but you know in your heart what that evil man did.
I'm labeling it fake news since it comes from fakeland

And no lie as big as yours will ever be taken seriously
 
It is fairly well known that back in 1983, Jeff Sessions raped a young boy. Disgusting. This alone should disqualify him.
Link pup
This is generally accepted knowledge and does not require a link.
It needs a link little pup. I love fake news thanks

You come from fakeland land of all libturds fake news archive
You're labeling this as fake news in an attempt to censor it, but you know in your heart what that evil man did.
I'm labeling it fake news since it comes from fakeland
Well ignore it at your own peril but you may want to keep young children away from him.

In addition, if I were you, I would start voting for and supporting liberal causes. We only want to help people and make the world a better place. Conservatives are racist.
 
This is generally accepted knowledge and does not require a link.
It needs a link little pup. I love fake news thanks

You come from fakeland land of all libturds fake news archive
You're labeling this as fake news in an attempt to censor it, but you know in your heart what that evil man did.
I'm labeling it fake news since it comes from fakeland
Well ignore it at your own peril but you may want to keep young children away from him.

In addition, if I were you, I would start voting for and supporting liberal causes. We only want to help people and make the world a better place. Conservatives are racist.
I don't ignore it cause it came from fakeland
 
What did Obama say? You can come a long for the ride, but you will have to sit in the back. Your party is out of power, so your opinion means nothing.

Well, sparky, the "opposition" always means something. Didn't Republicans prove that to you?
Democrats have no power. People spoke out against Obama's policies. Also Obama gave Trump powers a president shouldn't have, with your blessing.

Really? Is that why Hillary won the popular vote by 3 million votes?
How many seats did you lose in both houses?

You mean thanks to NaziCon gerrymandering?
Nope just Liberalism lost, even Obama said a vote for Hillary would be a vote for his legacy.
 
The positions and policies he has supported do not uplift America’s shared values of love, justice and mercy.

On Capitol Hill this week, the Senate Judiciary Committee will hold confirmation hearings to consider the first of Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations, Sen. Jefferson B. Sessions of Alabama. 26 years ago, this same committee denied Sessions a recommendation for the federal bench. “Most of Reagan’s judicial appointments have been people with impressive credentials regardless of their ideologies,” the editors of the LA Times wrote. “Sessions is a different story.”

The Senate refused to confirm Sessions in 1986 because the testimony they heard suggested that he sided with his namesake, Jefferson Davis, over America’s commitment to equal protection under the law.

A quarter century later, the Senate must decide if Sessions has changed.

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution.
If the photo of Senator Sessions greeting Donald Trump’s “thank you” tour in Mobile, Alabama, alongside Southern belles in hoop skirts isn’t enough to make clear what past greatness his support of Trump hearkens back to, then the nation should listen to the question of one civil rights veteran from Alabama who asked, in the language of Scripture, “Can a leopard change his spots?”

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee citizenship, equal protection under the law, and the ballot to all Americans.

Indeed. The record is clear. Here are eight reasons why the Senate must reject Sessions.

If Jefferson B. Sessions were confirmed by the Senate in 2017, we would have have an attorney general who, as a senator:
  1. Applauded the Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, which gutted key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1865.
  2. Voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act.
  3. Voted yes on a constitutional ban of same-sex marriage.
  4. Opposed the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.”
  5. Opposed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act.
  6. Voted to ease restrictions on wiretapping of cell-phones.
  7. Voted to abolish a program that helps businesses owned by women and minorities compete for federally funded transportation projects.
  8. Opposed comprehensive immigration reform and nearly every immigration bill that has come before the Senate over the past two decades, including voting against a Senate resolution affirming that the United States must not bar people from the country because of their religion.
More: 8 Reasons The Senate Must Reject Jeff Sessions - Rev. Dr. William J. Barber ll

This should be more than enough to reject Sessions - again!
This is generally accepted knowledge and does not require a link.
It needs a link little pup. I love fake news thanks

You come from fakeland land of all libturds fake news archive
You're labeling this as fake news in an attempt to censor it, but you know in your heart what that evil man did.
I'm labeling it fake news since it comes from fakeland
Well ignore it at your own peril but you may want to keep young children away from him.

In addition, if I were you, I would start voting for and supporting liberal causes. We only want to help people and make the world a better place. Conservatives are racist.


Certainly some conservatives are racist just like some Liberals are racist. To say that the party who supported Civil rights in the 50s and 60s suddenly traded places with the democrats and all became racists is a true distortion. Civil rights was something that was started by the people mostly and politicians were forced into it. Namely the Democrats who tried their best to resist civil rights legislation. They threatened with death, blacks who would vote republican at the time, and its easy to see the political lynchings have never gone away.
Once Democrats saw civil rights as a great vehicle to get elected to office many of them shifted position. Not all I'm sure but there were those who were not sincere, as it is true with all people.

As for wanting to help people and making the world a better place, that alone is no qualification for anything. How many revolutions have began and how many dictators rose up because someone knew better than everyone else what would help people and make the world a better place? Millions have died as a bi-product.
 

Forum List

Back
Top