80% of the Letitia James case for "Fraud" was tossed....statute of limitations

[ThisIsMe]

Again, if trump is fined, who does he pay the money to? James has said he defrauded the citizens of New York, banks, and insurers. So, is the 250 million the amount he defrauded New York for? Or combined New York, banks, and insurers?

If it’s all 3, does she plan on writing checks to all those people whom he defrauded, or is she going to sue on behalf of all those other people, but keep all the money for New York?

 

[Marener]

It sure does seem like he was assuming the value was between 18 and 27.6 million

So you’re making an assumption not stated.

Thanks. All I needed to know.

 

[DBA]

Why? It’s true to say that was the tax appraisal.

Do you guys have any idea what fraud is?

Yes, that is true, though irrelevant. The thing is, he used those numbers to erroneously calculate the 2300% number he referenced in the decision, so he didn't just mention them.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Trump just left the court house praising the judge for being fair, since he just tossed 80% of Latitia James' case.
The democrat's "prosecutorial misconduct" exposed.

Hhhmmmm.

Maybe there was a reason even con artist Alan Bragg wouldn't bring this case.

The Dems are so out over their skis at this point, they're being exposed for the absolute hacks they are.

This is totally blowing up in their faces.

And it's marvelous to behold.

 

[DBA]

So you’re making an assumption not stated.

Thanks. All I needed to know.

He used them to calculate the 2300% number you igit.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Who is illiterate?

The judge who agreed with the prosecutor that “Trump and his company deceived banks, insurers and others by massively overvaluing his assets and exaggerating his net worth on paperwork” or his ever-gullible retard followers?

Gee, that's funny.

Because none of the Banks are complaining.

But they're so helpless, with their armies of lawyers, they just couldn't avoid being taken advantage of by the Big Bad Orange Meanie.

Jesus fuck.

Even after Russia collusion, Hunter's laptop, and the rest of the never ending tsunami of lies proliferated by the Legacy Media - you bozos will still buy anything and everything they tell you.

It would be hilarious if it wasn't putting the country at so much risk.

 

[kyzr]

But your honor, I only killed two guys, not ten.

5x easier to prove I didn't kill 2 than 10.

First banana republic of NY case going down in flames...

 

[Marener]

He used them to calculate the 2300% number you igit.

Yes. Was the calculation incorrect?

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Why is NY state bringing this civil case and not the banks, insurers, and others Trump has defrauded? If Trump has bilked money from these companies, why haven't they filed suit against him?

And, while we're asking questions, why are Lefties so fucking stupid?

 

[RhodyPatriot]

A crime with no victim……..

What crime?

Forget the no victim, there isn't even a crime here.

Just a desperate play by a politically ambitious DA that turned out to be an incredibly abysmal strategic decision for the Dems.

 

[kyzr]

Just to give context to the case…this what the orange loser is up against…and I dare any retard to prove me wrong…


Mr. Trump is starting the trial at a significant disadvantage. Justice Engoron ruled last week that the former president had persistently committed fraud, deciding that no trial was needed to determine the claim at the core of Ms. James’s lawsuit.

As an initial punishment, Justice Engoron revoked Mr. Trump’s licenses to operate his New York properties, a move that could crush much of the business known as the Trump Organization.

At trial, Ms. James is seeking more from Justice Engoron, asking that he impose the $250 million penalty and that the former president be permanently barred from running a business in New York. The trial will determine what penalty Mr. Trump must pay and whether he will be banished from the world of New York real estate that made him famous.

Trump Civil Fraud Trial: Trump Begins Fraud Trial by Attacking Attorney General and Judge

Opening statements concluded in the trial of the former president, who has been accused in a lawsuit of inflating his net worth to win favorable terms on loans.

www.nytimes.com

In other words... the orange douchebag has already been found guilty. It is the extent of his fines that this trial is about. But hey, prove me wrong. Go.

1. the judge is not a real estate expert, he's a political hack

2. after the judge sees the actul evidence and hears from real experts the case will be dismissed.

3. the initial judge decision to ignore the statute of limitations was reversed by a higher court, so the kangaroo court may not e happening.

 

[kyzr]

His lawyers? His lawyer forgot to check the box requesting a jury trial

a jury trial would be much longer and more complex,
day-1 80% of the case gone, so far so good.

 

[Quasar44]

And Trump had to waste a good million hiring lawyers for this fake soviet Kangaroo ct

All done to humiliate and embrass him

 

[Dragonlady]

The Democratic corruption is far too deep in NYC for Trump to get a fair shake. It doesn't matter who the defense attorney is.

The Democratic corruption that there's no evidence even exists.

Every time Trump loses, you have excuses for him. It's never because he's guilty of the crimes of which he is accused. The prosecutor hates him. The judge is corrupt. His lawyer is incompetent. It's never because he's fucking guilty as hell!!!!

 

[Couchpotato]

Yes. Was the calculation incorrect?

OMG…….

 

[Dragonlady]

a jury trial would be much longer and more complex,
day-1 80% of the case gone, so far so good.

Nobody has "tossed" anything.

 

[dudmuck]

1. the judge is not a real estate expert, he's a political hack

2. after the judge sees the actul evidence and hears from real experts the case will be dismissed.

3. the initial judge decision to ignore the statute of limitations was reversed by a higher court, so the kangaroo court may not e happening.

In his ruling last week, Engoron wrote that the fraudulent statements of financial condition were still relevant in the case even if they're for transactions completed before 2014 because they were submitted within the applicable statute of limitations.

why did Trump go on an unhinged attack on judge if he has exonerating evidence, makes no sense.

 

[Concerned American]

Yes. Was the calculation incorrect?

Look up caveat emptor.

 

[Marener]

Look up caveat emptor.

Look up bank fraud.

 

[Concerned American]

Look up bank fraud.

What did he defraud them for? Why aren't they suing? Maybe you should read the disclaimers on real estate sales. LMAO. I love it when you morons get your asses handed to you after you figure you'll just TRUMP up some charges for ?????? You'll get him next time--when Adam Schiff finds that evidence. Maybe Alvin Bragg will find his as well. Have you refilled your blood pressure meds?