88 million Voters should sue Trump for the attempt to subvert our right to evict him from the White House with our votes.

I welcome related comments from other posters, especially ones that have brains and no hue to read.

Your attempted diversion away from trumps civil liability is duly noted.
Trump has no liability.. He told them to go "PEACFULLY MAKE YOUR VOICES HEARD" He did not do what Chuck Schumer did by inciting democrats to go from Cali to DC and attempt to assassinate a sitting US Supreme Court Justice.. But then its ok to intimidate judges because you don't like their ruling... This violates Federal Code USC 1507.
 
On Thursday night, in a primetime hearing, the House Jan. 6 select committee will begin formally unveiling its findings from its work over the past year investigating the siege of the U.S. Capitol. This may be the most intensive investigation in the history of Congress, with potentially far-reaching historical and political implications. But the real impact of the committee’s work will turn first and foremost — even before the understandable questions about whether it can break through in our fractured media environment or actually affect public opinion — on what the committee has learned as a factual matter.
Thus far, the committee, which has conducted more than 1,000 witness interviews, has already generated an array of discrete and significant revelations, despite being hampered by many Republicans’ refusal to cooperate. The hearings, however, will provide the public’s first insight into whether the committee has been able to answer, in something approximating an authoritative and comprehensive manner, some of the major questions within its broad investigative purview. Those questions may concern what happened on Jan. 6 itself, the failure of federal law enforcement to adequately safeguard the Capitol that day or, perhaps most importantly, the broader, extra-legal campaign by former President Donald Trump, along with his supporters and allies, to overturn the results of the election.

Here are seven yet-unanswered questions that are of particular interest.

 
A. 18 USC § 371: Conspiracy to Defraud the United States
The record of publicly disclosed facts shows that former President Donald Trump and members of his circle—including, at a minimum, outside attorney John Eastman—attempted to interfere with Congress’ electoral count on January 6, 2021. Among other things: They pressed Vice President Mike Pence to groundlessly reject electoral certificates from key states, attempting to deny Joe Biden the electoral college majority that he legitimately won in a fair and secure election. In the alternative, they wanted Pence to delay the electoral count. It furthermore appears that, in coercing leadership to baselessly declare the 2020 election to be tainted by fraud, in direct and unreasonable contravention of authoritative accounts, Trump and those around him—including, at a minimum, DOJ lawyer Jeffrey Clark—planned to interfere with the DOJ’s responsibility to investigate election offenses fairly and evenhandedly. There is substantial evidence supporting the conclusion that those schemes amount to one or more violations of 18 U.S.C. § 371, although any final determination must of course await the completion of the Committee’s hearing and report, and the decision of the DOJ. § 371 creates an offense “f two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy.”200
"and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy.”
This is the critical wording and the report does not provide any evidence that that occurred.
 
88 million BIDEN Voters should file a class action lawsuit against Trump, the 84 fake electors, the proud boys and the oath keepers, the estate of Ashley Babbitt and all the other capitol building attackers, if it’s worth more than a nickel, and all the Republicans in Congress who aided and comforted Trump’s openly hostile to democracy attempt to deny the right to vote and be counted against millions of Biden voters so that he can stay in power.

Trump openly and subversively plotted and carried out an an attempt to subvert our right to evict him with our votes from the White House. There needs to be punitive damages for such a immoral crime against so many millions of Americans. The punishment needs to be if he is not convicted of any federal statutes, that he cannot run for office ever again.

The same goes for all those who aided and abetted the forner and disgraced president in the big lie and the attempt to overturn the election.

That President Trump was involved in the January 6 plot to overthrow the election is plain as day. However the January 6 congressional committee will begin presenting all the evidence and testimony under oath from those who witnessed it up close in the White House and in Congress and in states offices.

So what do you think Trump voters? Will you spend your hard earned cash through the next few years helping Trump pay all his legal bills or are you going to bail on him?

Or do you just continue to believe the big lie and refuse to decide for yourself what the January 6 committee will be presenting starting tonight? How are you will you be watching the World according to Tucker Carlson on Fox News instead?
Now do Obama, Biden, Clapper, Brennan, Comey, Rice who colluded together in the White House to keep Trump 1) from getting elected, 2) discussed the illegal FISA spying on Trump associates and how to frame General Flynn. The FBI even helped to fund the phony dossier.

What about the Democrats who tried to coerce electoral voters to change their vote to Hillary?
 
You'd be hard pressed...

But the answer is simple... Trump was the worst fucking President ever... He had followers but he was no leader..
Take your head out of your ass and take note of the actions of your vegetable over the last year and a half. Uncontrolled borders, human trafficking, record gas prices, worst inflation in forty years, housing costs out of control, increasing interest rates, broken supply chain, critical shortage of baby formula because of a factory shut down by the govt, war in Ukraine, North Korea firing missiles again, China rattling their saber in Taiwan and S. China sea. Yeah, that sounds like a REAL competent president.
 
Link us up to the election results showing your Vegetable Messiah getting “88 million votes”, Stupid.


In the presidential election, there were 81,282,903 votes cast for Biden and 74,223,030 votes cast for President Donald Trump, according to a current tally from USA TODAY.

I am adding all the Republicans like Liz Cheney who didn’t vote for Biden but they don’t think Trump should’ve tried to steal the election by throwing her vote and everybody else’s vote out. I’m sure many of them will join us
 
Or do you just continue to believe the big lie and refuse to decide for yourself what the January 6 committee will be presenting starting tonight? How are you will you be watching the World according to Tucker Carlson on Fox News instead?
Why did the Capitol Police Chief RESIGN IMMEDIATELY AFTER the facilitated break-in of the Capitol? Will Ray Epps be present at the hearings to explain why he was inciting the crowds to invade the Capitol? Will Officer Byrd be held accountable for murdering an unarmed woman who was not an eminent threat to him?
 
Trump has no liability.. He told them to go "PEACFULLY MAKE YOUR VOICES HEARD" He did not do what Chuck Schumer did by inciting democrats to go from Cali to DC and attempt to assassinate a sitting US Supreme Court Justice.. But then its ok to intimidate judges because you don't like their ruling... This violates Federal Code USC 1507.
For the sake of discussion, let's pretend Trump has no culpability for the riot. You do understand that is only one component of the attempted coup, right?
 
On Thursday night, in a primetime hearing, the House Jan. 6 select committee will begin formally unveiling its findings from its work over the past year investigating the siege of the U.S. Capitol. This may be the most intensive investigation in the history of Congress, with potentially far-reaching historical and political implications. But the real impact of the committee’s work will turn first and foremost — even before the understandable questions about whether it can break through in our fractured media environment or actually affect public opinion — on what the committee has learned as a factual matter.
Thus far, the committee, which has conducted more than 1,000 witness interviews, has already generated an array of discrete and significant revelations, despite being hampered by many Republicans’ refusal to cooperate. The hearings, however, will provide the public’s first insight into whether the committee has been able to answer, in something approximating an authoritative and comprehensive manner, some of the major questions within its broad investigative purview. Those questions may concern what happened on Jan. 6 itself, the failure of federal law enforcement to adequately safeguard the Capitol that day or, perhaps most importantly, the broader, extra-legal campaign by former President Donald Trump, along with his supporters and allies, to overturn the results of the election.

Here are seven yet-unanswered questions that are of particular interest.

Haha haha hahaha hahaha
 
Take your head out of your ass and take note of the actions of your vegetable over the last year and a half. Uncontrolled borders, human trafficking, record gas prices, worst inflation in forty years, housing costs out of control, increasing interest rates, broken supply chain, critical shortage of baby formula because of a factory shut down by the govt, war in Ukraine, North Korea firing missiles again, China rattling their saber in Taiwan and S. China sea. Yeah, that sounds like a REAL competent president.
And you actually think all those crises all at once under Trump and his helter skelter non existent confirmed administration would have handled all of this any better?

That's where we differ!
 
Roflmao, nobody tries a coup unarmed

There is your pea in a pod you idiot

Five myths about coups

Coups are violent, bloody fights for power, just like civil wars.

“When you play the game of thrones, you win or you die,” as the hit TV show put it. “There is no middle ground.” Observers regularly contrast violent coups (“bullets”) with nonviolent elections (“ballots”), as political scientist Brian P. Klaas did in a 2015 paper. Encyclopaedia Britannica goes so far as to define coups as “the sudden, violent overthrow of an existing government by a small group,” lumping them together with rebellions and revolutions as forms of collective violence. PITF researchers likewise often analyze coups alongside revolutionary or ethnic civil wars, genocide and politicide.

Unlike in armed conflict and civil wars, fighting and death are not defining features of coups. Sure, all coup attempts involve at least the implicit threat of force, but fewer than half result in fatalities, according to data compiled by the political scientist Erica De Bruin. My own data suggests that 80 percent of coup attempts under autocracy involved explicit threats of force, less than 60 percent saw shots fired, less than 15 percent led to at least 25 deaths (a standard threshold among scholars for armed conflict) and only 1 percent escalated to fighting that caused at least 1,000 deaths (a standard threshold for civil war). In Tunisia’s “medical coup” in November 1987, for example, President Habib Bourguiba was ousted by Prime Minister Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, who sent doctors to the presidential palace in the middle of the night to examine Bourguiba and declare him unfit. As Naunihal Singh argues, coups may be better thought of as complex “coordination games” rather than “pitched battles” among military factions.


 
We have galloping inflation, food prices are going through the roof, it costs the better part of a $100 bill to fill a gas tank, babies are starving for lack of formula, maniacs are attempting to murder Supreme Court Justices, invaders are massing at the southern border, foreign policy is in shambles and Biden says things ain't likely to get better. What does the left complain about? You guessed it, Trump.
 
I'm confident he knows a coup requires fire power
It doesn't. And even if it did, just as conspiring to rob a bank is illegal, so too is conspiring to steal a presidential election. As we know some elements of the attempt were acted on. Like the plan to have certain battleground states submit sets of fake electors.
 

Forum List

Back
Top