Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
9/11....20 years of lies.
- Thread starter the other mike
- Start date
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,119
- 9,737
- 2,138
Is that why you're hiding him in Iran?There was never an Col osman and Osama did not change from anyone into Osama.Col Tim osman, the CIA/Mossad who became "Osama" was never in Saudi. Saudi lied about that. Saudi was invested in gold, oil(obvious), defense stocks and the long bond on 910.
Crown prince bin salman was epstein's #1 customer....
Osman and Simon Elliot (Baghdadi) live right next to Mike pence's new mansion on the WEST BANK...
The council on foreign relations.
View attachment 504001
The middle of that graphic should be a Star of David
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,853
- 4,783
- 265
Is that why you're hiding him in Iran?There was never an Col osman and Osama did not change from anyone into Osama.Col Tim osman, the CIA/Mossad who became "Osama" was never in Saudi. Saudi lied about that. Saudi was invested in gold, oil(obvious), defense stocks and the long bond on 910.
Crown prince bin salman was epstein's #1 customer....
No one is hiding anyone
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,853
- 4,783
- 265
Still no evidence
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,853
- 4,783
- 265
No it simply translates to anyone on this forum.All free Americans argue with the government. You are not doing so. You are argueing against your betters and you have only stupid fucking claims with no evidence.Who am I to argue with Uncle Sam ?Wrong they are not only possible they are proven by evidence which all your claims are lacking..What's impossible is the NIST conclusions.Which is impossible and which you have zero evidence of.Save the disingenuous sarcasm for the Sunday school kids.Bush used his company West Star Satellite along with Raytheon and pulled electricity off Hoover Dam and shot a Death Ray to incinerate the buildings, which is why they turned to dust. No bombs would turn everything to dust.
It was military grade-nano-thermite charges strategically placed on the core columns by 'elevator maintenance' crews , or fireproofing workers.
"Your betters" = "god's chosen people"
Apparently this one has problems with the
HEBREW TO. ENGLISH
Translation software too....
You are a proven liar and fucking idiot and have been owned on every thread
the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #66
It only takes a little common sense and knowledge of Newton's basic laws of physics to agree with us that neither the twins or Bldg 7 could have collapsed without controlled demolition charges having been placed there prior to 9/11, and it will eventually be shown to a grand jury, and put on record.Still no evidence
Whether or not folks get held accountable means nothing to me....only that the American people learn the truth.
- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,396
- 142,631
- 2,615
Trump pulled the triggerIt only takes a little common sense and knowledge of Newton's basic laws of physics to agree with us that neither the twins or Bldg 7 could have collapsed without controlled demolition charges having been placed there prior to 9/11, and it will eventually be shown to a grand jury, and put on record.Still no evidence
Whether or not folks get held accountable means nothing to me....only that the American people learn the truth.
the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #68
Trum
He couldn't have seen the 'jumpers' from his Trump Tower balcony- even on the clearest of days with a telescope - that would have barely been possible.
Trump knows the truth though.
Uptown near the Empire State bldg......4 miles away.
Trump lied about 9/11.Trump pulled the trigger
He couldn't have seen the 'jumpers' from his Trump Tower balcony- even on the clearest of days with a telescope - that would have barely been possible.
Trump knows the truth though.
Uptown near the Empire State bldg......4 miles away.
Last edited:
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,853
- 4,783
- 265
Wrong.It only takes a little common sense and knowledge of Newton's basic laws of physics to agree with us that neither the twins or Bldg 7 could have collapsed without controlled demolition charges having been placed there prior to 9/11, and it will eventually be shown to a grand jury, and put on record.Still no evidence
Whether or not folks get held accountable means nothing to me....only that the American people learn the truth.
Newtons laws and all other laws of physics prove the opposite and that the buildings had to come down as they did because of the impacts and resultiing fires.
Not one fucking shred of controlled demolition has ever been found and installling such charges would have been impossible,
No evidence has ever existed nor will any be shown to any jury.
Those are facts you cannot refute
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,853
- 4,783
- 265
Who cares about what trummp said?Trum
Trump lied about 9/11.Trump pulled the trigger
He couldn't have seen the 'jumpers' from his Trump Tower balcony- even on the clearest of days with a telescope - that would have barely been possible.
Trump knows the truth though.
View attachment 504137
Uptown near the Empire State bldg......4 miles away.
View attachment 504138
the other mike
Diamond Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,853
- 4,783
- 265
They did resist briefly and then collapsed as the laws of physics demand.The core columns would have resisted the collapses and cost too
Those are facts you cannot refute
much to clean up. Lucky Larry knew that.
the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #73
"They did resist briefly and then collapsed as the laws of physics demand."
Each tower fell straight down at near-freefall speed,
absolutely impossible...
...without demolition charges taking out the resisting core columns.
Each tower fell straight down at near-freefall speed,
absolutely impossible...
...without demolition charges taking out the resisting core columns.
the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #74
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,853
- 4,783
- 265
Each tower had to fall straight down at less than free fall speed. Each gtower fell down as they should have and near free fall speed means less than free fall speed by definition."They did resist briefly and then collapsed as the laws of physics demand."
Each tower fell straight down at near-freefall speed,
absolutely impossible...
View attachment 504213
...without demolition charges taking out the resisting core columns.
Not only possible but a certianty.
No demo charges were needed and no evidence exists that any were used.
the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #76
Let the kids decide for themselves.Each tower had to fall straight down at less than free fall speed. Each gtower fell down as they should have and near free fall speed means less than free fall speed by definition."They did resist briefly and then collapsed as the laws of physics demand."
Each tower fell straight down at near-freefall speed,
absolutely impossible...
View attachment 504213
...without demolition charges taking out the resisting core columns.
Not only possible but a certianty.
No demo charges were needed and no evidence exists that any were used.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,853
- 4,783
- 265
Let the kids decide for themselves.Each tower had to fall straight down at less than free fall speed. Each gtower fell down as they should have and near free fall speed means less than free fall speed by definition."They did resist briefly and then collapsed as the laws of physics demand."
Each tower fell straight down at near-freefall speed,
absolutely impossible...
View attachment 504213
...without demolition charges taking out the resisting core columns.
Not only possible but a certianty.
No demo charges were needed and no evidence exists that any were used.
Physics are not based on agreement and the laws of physics prove you wrong .
the other mike
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #78
Controlled demolition technician Tom Sullivan on 9/11 Free Fall
On this week’s episode of 9/11 Free Fall, former controlled demolition technician Tom Sullivan joins host Andy Steele to explain the process involved in leveling skyscrapers and offer his insights into the destruction of the World Trade Center.
Let the kids decide for themselves.Each tower had to fall straight down at less than free fall speed. Each gtower fell down as they should have and near free fall speed means less than free fall speed by definition."They did resist briefly and then collapsed as the laws of physics demand."
Each tower fell straight down at near-freefall speed,
absolutely impossible...
View attachment 504213
...without demolition charges taking out the resisting core columns.
Not only possible but a certianty.
No demo charges were needed and no evidence exists that any were used.
Adults have dismissed you and your ilk a long time ago.
- Dec 9, 2013
- 16,853
- 4,783
- 265
Still no evidence.Controlled demolition technician Tom Sullivan on 9/11 Free Fall
On this week’s episode of 9/11 Free Fall, former controlled demolition technician Tom Sullivan joins host Andy Steele to explain the process involved in leveling skyscrapers and offer his insights into the destruction of the World Trade Center.www.ae911truth.org
Similar threads
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 199
- Replies
- 123
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 89
- Views
- 771
- Poll
- Replies
- 50
- Views
- 652
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 52
- Views
- 530
- Replies
- 167
- Views
- 733
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 132
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8081
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-