you mean this one?in fact it's an experimental device that can cut 1" rebar then expend it's fuel!the difference is your shit is not fact.as if you'd know the difference
This could go on forever!
>> look at the evidence
> thats NOT evidence!
>> look at this, its a demo of thermite cutting steel.
> that isn't evidence!
oh well ......
is AMERICA doomed?
it was not demonstrated that it could cut steel beams ...
Have you seen Johnathan Cole's demo of thermite cutting a steel beam?
false comparison not to mention the prep time and not being caught doing it!
Prep-time + not getting caught installing the devices could be addressed using modular pre-assembled devices that could be installed under the excuse of trades people working on the building, internet wiring up-grades .... or? whatever, the office minions have better things to do than investigate exactly what the workers are doing.
So you cling to your theory despite the fact that in the nearly 13 years since 9/11 no hard evidence of your demo theory has surfaced. None of cut beams. None of explosions. None of site preparation. None of magical pre-assembled modular thermite devices. Nothing.
Even if you ignore all the eye witnesses and testimony from NY fire fighters, how were those magical modular devices planted (and by whom) and when and how did they survive the fires raging in those buildings?
You may want to apply the same measure of cynicism to the conspiracy theories as you do to the official reports. Or not.