Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Most of them were Saudi Citizens, but I don't know exactly which country they flew here from. It's irrelevant because the situation has changed since they arrived here in the US. A better question is where had they been and where did they train and plan the attack from.It's as if liberals are rooting for another 911 so they can blame it on Trump in the media.Can you imagine the snowflake and ACLU outrage if there was a CRIMINAL COURT that had over 80% of their CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED?
The decision is 100% bogus. The State of Washington does not get to determine the foreign threats to America.
Maybe the State should fund their own defense.
Every one of them claims this will help keep us safe at the same moment it makes us less safe.
Where did the 9/11 attackers come from?
Banning "citizens"?! WTF are you talking about?So banning citizens based upon their country doesn't make a lot of sense. Is that what you're saying?
Banning "citizens"?! WTF are you talking about?So banning citizens based upon their country doesn't make a lot of sense. Is that what you're saying?
That was pretty greasy Paco. Citizens!!! FFS!Banning "citizens"?! WTF are you talking about?So banning citizens based upon their country doesn't make a lot of sense. Is that what you're saying?
Lay back down Jethro.
Can you imagine the snowflake and ACLU outrage if there was a CRIMINAL COURT that had over 80% of their CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED?
The decision is 100% bogus. The State of Washington does not get to determine the foreign threats to America.
Maybe the State should fund their own defense.
moron,,,, typical trumpster L lying loon....
Rate of overturned decisions[edit]
From 1999 to 2008, of the 0.151% of Ninth Circuit Court rulings that were reviewed by the Supreme Court, 20% were affirmed, 19% were vacated, and 61% were reversed; the median reversal rate for all federal appellate courts was 68.29% for the same period.[7] Others argue the court's high percentage of reversals is illusory, resulting from the circuit hearing more cases than the other circuits. This results in the Supreme Court reviewing a smaller proportion of its cases, letting stand the vast majority of its cases.[8][9]
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Wikipedia
the reversal rate is 61% AND THE MEEIAN REVERSAL RATE FOR ALL FEDERA APPEALS COURT IS 68.2%
this is why you uninformed, uneducated twits were able to vote for the orange sociopath.
oh....and hint: the supreme court does not take cases from district courts unless they are a) matters of national interest AND THERE IS A SPLIT BETWEEN CIRCUITS.
jeez you people are the stupidest people on the planet... you just keep saying whatever stupid idiocy comes to your underdeveloped brains EVEN WHEN THESE THINGS CAN BE EASILY CHECKED.
Can you imagine the snowflake and ACLU outrage if there was a CRIMINAL COURT that had over 80% of their CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED?
The decision is 100% bogus. The State of Washington does not get to determine the foreign threats to America.
Maybe the State should fund their own defense.
moron,,,, typical trumpster pathetic lying loon....
Rate of overturned decisions[edit]
From 1999 to 2008, of the 0.151% of Ninth Circuit Court rulings that were reviewed by the Supreme Court, 20% were affirmed, 19% were vacated, and 61% were reversed; the median reversal rate for all federal appellate courts was 68.29% for the same period.[7] Others argue the court's high percentage of reversals is illusory, resulting from the circuit hearing more cases than the other circuits. This results in the Supreme Court reviewing a smaller proportion of its cases, letting stand the vast majority of its cases.[8][9]
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Wikipedia
the reversal rate is 61% AND THE MEEIAN REVERSAL RATE FOR ALL FEDERA APPEALS COURT IS 68.2%
this is why you uninformed, uneducated twits were able to vote for the orange sociopath.
oh....and hint: the supreme court does not take cases from district courts unless they are a) matters of national interest AND THERE IS A SPLIT BETWEEN CIRCUITS.
jeez you people are the stupidest people on the planet... you just keep saying whatever stupid idiocy comes to your underdeveloped brains EVEN WHEN THESE THINGS CAN BE EASILY CHECKED.
Judges don't get to decide that, only Congress does.Judges decide on the facts in front of them. And this horribly drafted EO and the clownish defense put on by the government lawyer left the judges no choice. I could write a constitutional EO in an hour. Why aren't we just doing that and not whining and screeching about judges who were handed a stinking pile of monkey dirt and ruled that what they had in front of them is a stinking pile of monkey dirt. Fix the problem. Make us safer. Then move on.Learn how the Supreme Court issues cert. in other words which cases they select to hear. Then take your talking point and think about it.Can you imagine the snowflake and ACLU outrage if there was a CRIMINAL COURT that had over 80% of their CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED?
The decision is 100% bogus. The State of Washington does not get to determine the foreign threats to America.
Maybe the State should fund their own defense.
This ruling by the 9th Circuit Court will not be overturned, because the POTUS does not have the authority to limit immigration?
Why does Washington State get to decide Federal immigration policy. Can you cite the statute?
Can you imagine the snowflake and ACLU outrage if there was a CRIMINAL COURT that had over 80% of their CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED?
The decision is 100% bogus. The State of Washington does not get to determine the foreign threats to America.
Maybe the State should fund their own defense.
Excluding the Ninth Circuit, the Supreme Court overturns 67% of cases.
http://www.americanbar.org/content/...azine/LandslideJan2010_Hofer.authcheckdam.pdf
That's not surprising. They only take cases that have serious constitutional concerns.
Judges don't get to decide that, only Congress does.Judges decide on the facts in front of them. And this horribly drafted EO and the clownish defense put on by the government lawyer left the judges no choice. I could write a constitutional EO in an hour. Why aren't we just doing that and not whining and screeching about judges who were handed a stinking pile of monkey dirt and ruled that what they had in front of them is a stinking pile of monkey dirt. Fix the problem. Make us safer. Then move on.Learn how the Supreme Court issues cert. in other words which cases they select to hear. Then take your talking point and think about it.Can you imagine the snowflake and ACLU outrage if there was a CRIMINAL COURT that had over 80% of their CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED?
The decision is 100% bogus. The State of Washington does not get to determine the foreign threats to America.
Maybe the State should fund their own defense.
This ruling by the 9th Circuit Court will not be overturned, because the POTUS does not have the authority to limit immigration?
Why does Washington State get to decide Federal immigration policy. Can you cite the statute?
Only Congress has the power to judge the actions of president when they are within his authority(impeachment, holding cabinet members in contempt of congress etc)Judges don't get to decide that, only Congress does.Judges decide on the facts in front of them. And this horribly drafted EO and the clownish defense put on by the government lawyer left the judges no choice. I could write a constitutional EO in an hour. Why aren't we just doing that and not whining and screeching about judges who were handed a stinking pile of monkey dirt and ruled that what they had in front of them is a stinking pile of monkey dirt. Fix the problem. Make us safer. Then move on.Learn how the Supreme Court issues cert. in other words which cases they select to hear. Then take your talking point and think about it.Can you imagine the snowflake and ACLU outrage if there was a CRIMINAL COURT that had over 80% of their CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED?
The decision is 100% bogus. The State of Washington does not get to determine the foreign threats to America.
Maybe the State should fund their own defense.
This ruling by the 9th Circuit Court will not be overturned, because the POTUS does not have the authority to limit immigration?
Why does Washington State get to decide Federal immigration policy. Can you cite the statute?
Huh? Only Congress gets to decide the terms of executive orders? I like Steely Dan, but this pretzel logic is beyond me.
Only Congress has the power to judge the actions of president when they are within his authority(impeachment, holding cabinet members in contempt of congress etc)Judges don't get to decide that, only Congress does.Judges decide on the facts in front of them. And this horribly drafted EO and the clownish defense put on by the government lawyer left the judges no choice. I could write a constitutional EO in an hour. Why aren't we just doing that and not whining and screeching about judges who were handed a stinking pile of monkey dirt and ruled that what they had in front of them is a stinking pile of monkey dirt. Fix the problem. Make us safer. Then move on.Learn how the Supreme Court issues cert. in other words which cases they select to hear. Then take your talking point and think about it.
This ruling by the 9th Circuit Court will not be overturned, because the POTUS does not have the authority to limit immigration?
Why does Washington State get to decide Federal immigration policy. Can you cite the statute?
Huh? Only Congress gets to decide the terms of executive orders? I like Steely Dan, but this pretzel logic is beyond me.
Even the idiots on the 9th circuit admitted that the Judicial branch is not one of the "political branches".
Only Congress has the power to judge the actions of president when they are within his authority(impeachment, holding cabinet members in contempt of congress etc)Judges don't get to decide that, only Congress does.Judges decide on the facts in front of them. And this horribly drafted EO and the clownish defense put on by the government lawyer left the judges no choice. I could write a constitutional EO in an hour. Why aren't we just doing that and not whining and screeching about judges who were handed a stinking pile of monkey dirt and ruled that what they had in front of them is a stinking pile of monkey dirt. Fix the problem. Make us safer. Then move on.Learn how the Supreme Court issues cert. in other words which cases they select to hear. Then take your talking point and think about it.
This ruling by the 9th Circuit Court will not be overturned, because the POTUS does not have the authority to limit immigration?
Why does Washington State get to decide Federal immigration policy. Can you cite the statute?
Huh? Only Congress gets to decide the terms of executive orders? I like Steely Dan, but this pretzel logic is beyond me.
Even the idiots on the 9th circuit admitted that the Judicial branch is not one of the "political branches".
Judges don't get to decide that, only Congress does.Judges decide on the facts in front of them. And this horribly drafted EO and the clownish defense put on by the government lawyer left the judges no choice. I could write a constitutional EO in an hour. Why aren't we just doing that and not whining and screeching about judges who were handed a stinking pile of monkey dirt and ruled that what they had in front of them is a stinking pile of monkey dirt. Fix the problem. Make us safer. Then move on.Learn how the Supreme Court issues cert. in other words which cases they select to hear. Then take your talking point and think about it.Can you imagine the snowflake and ACLU outrage if there was a CRIMINAL COURT that had over 80% of their CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED?
The decision is 100% bogus. The State of Washington does not get to determine the foreign threats to America.
Maybe the State should fund their own defense.
This ruling by the 9th Circuit Court will not be overturned, because the POTUS does not have the authority to limit immigration?
Why does Washington State get to decide Federal immigration policy. Can you cite the statute?
Only Congress has the power to judge the actions of president when they are within his authority(impeachment, holding cabinet members in contempt of congress etc)Judges don't get to decide that, only Congress does.Judges decide on the facts in front of them. And this horribly drafted EO and the clownish defense put on by the government lawyer left the judges no choice. I could write a constitutional EO in an hour. Why aren't we just doing that and not whining and screeching about judges who were handed a stinking pile of monkey dirt and ruled that what they had in front of them is a stinking pile of monkey dirt. Fix the problem. Make us safer. Then move on.Learn how the Supreme Court issues cert. in other words which cases they select to hear. Then take your talking point and think about it.
This ruling by the 9th Circuit Court will not be overturned, because the POTUS does not have the authority to limit immigration?
Why does Washington State get to decide Federal immigration policy. Can you cite the statute?
Huh? Only Congress gets to decide the terms of executive orders? I like Steely Dan, but this pretzel logic is beyond me.
Even the idiots on the 9th circuit admitted that the Judicial branch is not one of the "political branches".
Only Congress has the power to judge the actions of president when they are within his authority(impeachment, holding cabinet members in contempt of congress etc)Judges don't get to decide that, only Congress does.Judges decide on the facts in front of them. And this horribly drafted EO and the clownish defense put on by the government lawyer left the judges no choice. I could write a constitutional EO in an hour. Why aren't we just doing that and not whining and screeching about judges who were handed a stinking pile of monkey dirt and ruled that what they had in front of them is a stinking pile of monkey dirt. Fix the problem. Make us safer. Then move on.This ruling by the 9th Circuit Court will not be overturned, because the POTUS does not have the authority to limit immigration?
Why does Washington State get to decide Federal immigration policy. Can you cite the statute?
Huh? Only Congress gets to decide the terms of executive orders? I like Steely Dan, but this pretzel logic is beyond me.
Even the idiots on the 9th circuit admitted that the Judicial branch is not one of the "political branches".
Well, when you block an EO that is 100% CONSTITUTIONAL, it's political.
Can you imagine the snowflake and ACLU outrage if there was a CRIMINAL COURT that had over 80% of their CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED?
The decision is 100% bogus. The State of Washington does not get to determine the foreign threats to America.
Maybe the State should fund their own defense.
Can you imagine the snowflake and ACLU outrage if there was a CRIMINAL COURT that had over 80% of their CONVICTIONS OVERTURNED?
The decision is 100% bogus. The State of Washington does not get to determine the foreign threats to America.
Maybe the State should fund their own defense.
Only Congress has the power to judge the actions of president when they are within his authority(impeachment, holding cabinet members in contempt of congress etc)Judges don't get to decide that, only Congress does.Judges decide on the facts in front of them. And this horribly drafted EO and the clownish defense put on by the government lawyer left the judges no choice. I could write a constitutional EO in an hour. Why aren't we just doing that and not whining and screeching about judges who were handed a stinking pile of monkey dirt and ruled that what they had in front of them is a stinking pile of monkey dirt. Fix the problem. Make us safer. Then move on.This ruling by the 9th Circuit Court will not be overturned, because the POTUS does not have the authority to limit immigration?
Why does Washington State get to decide Federal immigration policy. Can you cite the statute?
Huh? Only Congress gets to decide the terms of executive orders? I like Steely Dan, but this pretzel logic is beyond me.
Even the idiots on the 9th circuit admitted that the Judicial branch is not one of the "political branches".
Well, when you block an EO that is 100% CONSTITUTIONAL, it's political.
Only Congress has the power to judge the actions of president when they are within his authority(impeachment, holding cabinet members in contempt of congress etc)Judges don't get to decide that, only Congress does.Judges decide on the facts in front of them. And this horribly drafted EO and the clownish defense put on by the government lawyer left the judges no choice. I could write a constitutional EO in an hour. Why aren't we just doing that and not whining and screeching about judges who were handed a stinking pile of monkey dirt and ruled that what they had in front of them is a stinking pile of monkey dirt. Fix the problem. Make us safer. Then move on.
Huh? Only Congress gets to decide the terms of executive orders? I like Steely Dan, but this pretzel logic is beyond me.
Even the idiots on the 9th circuit admitted that the Judicial branch is not one of the "political branches".
Well, when you block an EO that is 100% CONSTITUTIONAL, it's political.
And that is why Trump won't appeal the 9th Circuit's decision to the Supreme Court? Because the decision was political?