A 21st Century Genocide

Status
Not open for further replies.

MJB12741

Gold Member
Feb 19, 2012
13,882
3,009
280
We are all aware of the Nazi holocaust against the Jews. But why no Zionist mention of Israel's genocide against the Palestinians? In 1948 there were approximarely 1.2 million Palestinians residing in Israel. And now there are only just over 6 million of them left. And this ethnic cleansing continues even now. Shame on you Zionists for allowing this to happen. LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!


Population Statistics - Israeli-Palestinian Conflict - ProCon.org
 
Just as in basketball when "da ball don' lie" in this case "da numba's don' lie".
 
Just as in basketball when "da ball don' lie" in this case "da numba's don' lie".

From one million to over 6 million. Yep, it's a GENOCIDE, the worst case of ETHNIC CLEASNSING being committed by Israel on the noble, life loving, peace loving Palestinians. And if you don't believe me, just ask PBel & the other Pali supporters. Heh Heh!
 
You still haven't quite understood what the legal definition of Genocide is. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. LOL

By the way, does the fact the world wide Jewish population was higher in 1948 than in 1940 mean that the Germans did not commit Genocide?

 
Last edited:
You still haven't quite understood what the legal definition of Genocide is. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. LOL

Oh hi Monte. Hey, did you hear the one about "Israel is stealing 'Palestinian' land"?
 
You still haven't quite understood what the legal definition of Genocide is. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. LOL

Oh hi Monte. Hey, did you hear the one about "Israel is stealing 'Palestinian' land"?

Yes, about 26,670,455 dunams.

land ownership only.jpg



A Survey of Palestine Volume 2 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner
 
You still haven't quite understood what the legal definition of Genocide is. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. LOL

By the way, does the fact the world wide Jewish population was higher in 1948 than in 1940 mean that the Germans did not commit Genocide?




Do you as I ant see a wholesale mass murder of Palestinian arab muslims taking place. I do see the mass murder of Christians by Palestinian arab muslims though.
 
You still haven't quite understood what the legal definition of Genocide is. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. LOL

By the way, does the fact the world wide Jewish population was higher in 1948 than in 1940 mean that the Germans did not commit Genocide?




Changing the goal posts does not help your cause. Does the fact that European Jewry was decimated by first the Russians and then the Germans reducing the population of European Jews to less than 10% of its figure pre 1900. Does the population of M.E. being reduced by 50% between 1947 and 1967 mean that the arab muslims did mass murder them in reprisal for declaring independence, and then destroying the armies of three arab nations
 
You still haven't quite understood what the legal definition of Genocide is. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. LOL

Oh hi Monte. Hey, did you hear the one about "Israel is stealing 'Palestinian' land"?

Yes, about 26,670,455 dunams.

View attachment 42316


A Survey of Palestine Volume 2 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner




Owned by absentee Ottoman landlords until Mandate was fulfilled and the land was handed over to its legal sovereign owners. A clue the arab muslims refused to have anything to do with the Mandate so gave up their right to anything. It is all in one of your links
 
You still haven't quite understood what the legal definition of Genocide is. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. LOL

Oh hi Monte. Hey, did you hear the one about "Israel is stealing 'Palestinian' land"?

Yes, about 26,670,455 dunams.

View attachment 42316


A Survey of Palestine Volume 2 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner




Owned by absentee Ottoman landlords until Mandate was fulfilled and the land was handed over to its legal sovereign owners. A clue the arab muslims refused to have anything to do with the Mandate so gave up their right to anything. It is all in one of your links

Where does it say Ottoman Landlords? It says Arab population. And don't give that crap about possession not meaning ownership.

164. The Arab population, despite the strenuous efforts of Jews to acquire land in Palestine, at present remains in possession of approximately 85 per cent of the land. The provisions of the land transfer regulations of 1940, which gave effect to the 1939 White Paper policy, have severely restricted the Jewish efforts to acquire new land.

A 364 of 3 September 1947
 
You still haven't quite understood what the legal definition of Genocide is. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. LOL

Oh hi Monte. Hey, did you hear the one about "Israel is stealing 'Palestinian' land"?

Yes, about 26,670,455 dunams.

View attachment 42316


A Survey of Palestine Volume 2 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner




Owned by absentee Ottoman landlords until Mandate was fulfilled and the land was handed over to its legal sovereign owners. A clue the arab muslims refused to have anything to do with the Mandate so gave up their right to anything. It is all in one of your links

Where does it say Ottoman Landlords? It says Arab population. And don't give that crap about possession not meaning ownership.

164. The Arab population, despite the strenuous efforts of Jews to acquire land in Palestine, at present remains in possession of approximately 85 per cent of the land. The provisions of the land transfer regulations of 1940, which gave effect to the 1939 White Paper policy, have severely restricted the Jewish efforts to acquire new land.

A 364 of 3 September 1947





No it says arabs and OTHER MUSLIMS


Destroyed this one once want it again.


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.

165. The Arabs consider that all of the territory - of Palestine is by Tight Arab patrimony. Although in an Arab State they would recognize the right of Jews to continue in possession - of land legally acquired by them during the Man-date, they would regard as a violation of their "natural" right any effort, such as partition, to reduce the territory of Palestine.

167. With regard to the promises and pledges made to the Arabs as inducement for their support of the Allies in the First World War, it is to be noted that apparently there is no unequivocal agreement as to whether Palestine was included within the territory pledged to independence by the McMahon-Hussein correspondence. In this connexion, since the question of interpretation was raised Great Britain has consistently denied that Palestine was among the territories to which independence was pledged.

174. It was also Amir Feisal who, representing and acting on behalf of the Arab Kingdom of the Hejaz, signed an agreement with Dr. Weizmann, representing and acting on behalf of the Zionist Organization. In this agreement, Feisal, subject to the condition that the Arabs obtained independence as demanded in his Memorandum to the British Foreign Office of 4 January 1919, accepted the Balfour Declaration and the encouragement of Jewish immigration into Palestine. The Feisal-Weizmann agreement did not acquire validity, since the condition attached was not fulfilled at the time.

176. With regard to the principle of self-determination, although international recognition was extended to this principle at the end of the First World War and it was adhered to with regard to the other Arab territories, at the time of the creation of the "A" Mandates, it was not applied to Palestine, obviously because of the intention to make possible the creation of the Jewish National Home there. Actually, it may well be said that the Jewish National Home and the sui generis Mandate for Palestine run counter to that principle





 
You still haven't quite understood what the legal definition of Genocide is. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. LOL

Oh hi Monte. Hey, did you hear the one about "Israel is stealing 'Palestinian' land"?

Yes, about 26,670,455 dunams.

View attachment 42316


A Survey of Palestine Volume 2 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner




Owned by absentee Ottoman landlords until Mandate was fulfilled and the land was handed over to its legal sovereign owners. A clue the arab muslims refused to have anything to do with the Mandate so gave up their right to anything. It is all in one of your links

Where does it say Ottoman Landlords? It says Arab population. And don't give that crap about possession not meaning ownership.

164. The Arab population, despite the strenuous efforts of Jews to acquire land in Palestine, at present remains in possession of approximately 85 per cent of the land. The provisions of the land transfer regulations of 1940, which gave effect to the 1939 White Paper policy, have severely restricted the Jewish efforts to acquire new land.

A 364 of 3 September 1947

The troll just keeps repeating the same propaganda with the same set of mutilated and misrepresented documents.
 
You still haven't quite understood what the legal definition of Genocide is. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer. LOL

Oh hi Monte. Hey, did you hear the one about "Israel is stealing 'Palestinian' land"?

Yes, about 26,670,455 dunams.

View attachment 42316


A Survey of Palestine Volume 2 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner




Owned by absentee Ottoman landlords until Mandate was fulfilled and the land was handed over to its legal sovereign owners. A clue the arab muslims refused to have anything to do with the Mandate so gave up their right to anything. It is all in one of your links

Where does it say Ottoman Landlords? It says Arab population. And don't give that crap about possession not meaning ownership.

164. The Arab population, despite the strenuous efforts of Jews to acquire land in Palestine, at present remains in possession of approximately 85 per cent of the land. The provisions of the land transfer regulations of 1940, which gave effect to the 1939 White Paper policy, have severely restricted the Jewish efforts to acquire new land.

A 364 of 3 September 1947





No it says arabs and OTHER MUSLIMS


Destroyed this one once want it again.


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.

165. The Arabs consider that all of the territory - of Palestine is by Tight Arab patrimony. Although in an Arab State they would recognize the right of Jews to continue in possession - of land legally acquired by them during the Man-date, they would regard as a violation of their "natural" right any effort, such as partition, to reduce the territory of Palestine.

167. With regard to the promises and pledges made to the Arabs as inducement for their support of the Allies in the First World War, it is to be noted that apparently there is no unequivocal agreement as to whether Palestine was included within the territory pledged to independence by the McMahon-Hussein correspondence. In this connexion, since the question of interpretation was raised Great Britain has consistently denied that Palestine was among the territories to which independence was pledged.

174. It was also Amir Feisal who, representing and acting on behalf of the Arab Kingdom of the Hejaz, signed an agreement with Dr. Weizmann, representing and acting on behalf of the Zionist Organization. In this agreement, Feisal, subject to the condition that the Arabs obtained independence as demanded in his Memorandum to the British Foreign Office of 4 January 1919, accepted the Balfour Declaration and the encouragement of Jewish immigration into Palestine. The Feisal-Weizmann agreement did not acquire validity, since the condition attached was not fulfilled at the time.

176. With regard to the principle of self-determination, although international recognition was extended to this principle at the end of the First World War and it was adhered to with regard to the other Arab territories, at the time of the creation of the "A" Mandates, it was not applied to Palestine, obviously because of the intention to make possible the creation of the Jewish National Home there. Actually, it may well be said that the Jewish National Home and the sui generis Mandate for Palestine run counter to that principle




"Actually, it may well be said that the Jewish National Home and the sui generis Mandate for Palestine run counter to that principle."

No need to provide more evidence that the "principle of self-determination" was not applied to Palestine in contravention of Article 22 of Covenant of the League of Nations. I already knew that.
 
The mentally ill moron is delusional. Now he's trying to say that the League of Nations and British DID NOT intend to create a Jewish national home in the Palestine mandate.

One doesn't even know where to start with retards like this. There is no cure for his type.
 
You do have a reading comprehension problem. I stated that the British confirmed, in the sentence in question, that "principle of self determination" for the people of Class A Mandates as stated in Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations was contravened by Britain at the expense of the Christians and Muslims of Palestine. What there is no cure for is your lack of intelligence and your inability to communicate without spouting obscenities and hurling personal insults. I suspect it has to do with your self-esteem issues and cowardice. In person you wouldn't dare behave as you do online.
 
^^^^^
Who gives a fuck. The League of Nations and British did as they saw fit with conquered Ottoman territory. There were many fuck ups the Britush engaged in, for example the division of India and Pakistan, etc. in the case of the Palestine mandate the British should have told the Arab Muslims to take a hike. They had already turned all of the ME into these Muslim states we see today.
 
^^^^^
Who gives a fuck. The League of Nations and British did as they saw fit with conquered Ottoman territory. There were many fuck ups the Britush engaged in, for example the division of India and Pakistan, etc. in the case of the Palestine mandate the British should have told the Arab Muslims to take a hike. They had already turned all of the ME into these Muslim states we see today.

Well, the Christians and Muslims of Palestine certainly "gave a f-ck" as you so elegantly put it. And, people that believe in justice and fairness continue to care about it, as you can see from this forum.
 
Oh hi Monte. Hey, did you hear the one about "Israel is stealing 'Palestinian' land"?

Yes, about 26,670,455 dunams.

View attachment 42316


A Survey of Palestine Volume 2 Berman Jewish Policy Archive NYU Wagner




Owned by absentee Ottoman landlords until Mandate was fulfilled and the land was handed over to its legal sovereign owners. A clue the arab muslims refused to have anything to do with the Mandate so gave up their right to anything. It is all in one of your links

Where does it say Ottoman Landlords? It says Arab population. And don't give that crap about possession not meaning ownership.

164. The Arab population, despite the strenuous efforts of Jews to acquire land in Palestine, at present remains in possession of approximately 85 per cent of the land. The provisions of the land transfer regulations of 1940, which gave effect to the 1939 White Paper policy, have severely restricted the Jewish efforts to acquire new land.

A 364 of 3 September 1947





No it says arabs and OTHER MUSLIMS


Destroyed this one once want it again.


163. The Arabs of Palestine consider themselves as having a "natural" right to that country, although they have not been in possession of it as a sovereign nation.

165. The Arabs consider that all of the territory - of Palestine is by Tight Arab patrimony. Although in an Arab State they would recognize the right of Jews to continue in possession - of land legally acquired by them during the Man-date, they would regard as a violation of their "natural" right any effort, such as partition, to reduce the territory of Palestine.

167. With regard to the promises and pledges made to the Arabs as inducement for their support of the Allies in the First World War, it is to be noted that apparently there is no unequivocal agreement as to whether Palestine was included within the territory pledged to independence by the McMahon-Hussein correspondence. In this connexion, since the question of interpretation was raised Great Britain has consistently denied that Palestine was among the territories to which independence was pledged.

174. It was also Amir Feisal who, representing and acting on behalf of the Arab Kingdom of the Hejaz, signed an agreement with Dr. Weizmann, representing and acting on behalf of the Zionist Organization. In this agreement, Feisal, subject to the condition that the Arabs obtained independence as demanded in his Memorandum to the British Foreign Office of 4 January 1919, accepted the Balfour Declaration and the encouragement of Jewish immigration into Palestine. The Feisal-Weizmann agreement did not acquire validity, since the condition attached was not fulfilled at the time.

176. With regard to the principle of self-determination, although international recognition was extended to this principle at the end of the First World War and it was adhered to with regard to the other Arab territories, at the time of the creation of the "A" Mandates, it was not applied to Palestine, obviously because of the intention to make possible the creation of the Jewish National Home there. Actually, it may well be said that the Jewish National Home and the sui generis Mandate for Palestine run counter to that principle




"Actually, it may well be said that the Jewish National Home and the sui generis Mandate for Palestine run counter to that principle."

No need to provide more evidence that the "principle of self-determination" was not applied to Palestine in contravention of Article 22 of Covenant of the League of Nations. I already knew that.





This is what it says in the same paragraph

176. With regard to the principle of self-determination, although international recognition was extended to this principle at the end of the First World War and it was adhered to with regard to the other Arab territories, at the time of the creation of the "A" Mandates, it was not applied to Palestine,



See freddy boy you cherry picked again and ended up with more egg on your face.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top