A citizen with a gun took out the Texas killer as he fled.

You could with a bomb or truck. Get the point. Unless you want vehicles to be illegal, too...
One of the strictest, from just a few days ago. Nine people dismembered. Rather a bullet than be dismembered.
Police find nine bodies hidden in man’s apartment
Show me any nation that has forbidden guns that has a zero murder rate.
How many MORE laws on firearms would we have to enact, before this stops?

another 1,000?

5,000?

10,000?

We'll never know, since you gun nuts already won. We'll never be one of those nations with a murder rate of 1.0 or less because of that. I've already noted in this thread that the number of guns in this country, and the ease at which criminals can get their hands on them because of that, is the best argument against gun control.
It may not be zero, but it is a hell of a lot lower than in the US.
You don't kill 26 people in a few seconds by dismembering them. Get the fucking point.
 
I don’t know. If he really wanted one, he could get one easily anyways since we’ve been so completely lax on gun laws for so many decades.
Yes indeed, filthy democrats are easy on crime because it pushes their bs gun ban agenda.
^ :cuckoo:
It's a fact liar. You bastards are always wanting to empty prisons. Democrats killed the bill sponsored by the NRA that would have made a crime committed with a gun carry a least 5 years in prison.
You guys supported the NRA’s stance that the mentally ill and potential terrorists on no fly lists should have guns.
You guys supported the NRA’s stance that the mentally ill

people that some desk jockey at the IRS determined to be mentally ill, because they couldn't do their own taxes?

potential terrorists on no fly lists

potential terrorists?

Like,,,Cat Stevens, Teddy Kennedy?

Lot of people on the no-fly list that shouldn't be

Cat Stevens (Yusuf Islam) was suspected of financing terror groups. He was eventually removed.
 
Sure he was. Up until he murdered a bunch of people, proving murder laws only work with law abiding people.

He was law abiding?

yup


up til he got the Dishonorable Discharge.

(Which made it illegal for him to buy a firearm legally)
Boom. Proof that laws don't work. Thank you :clap:


Laws dont' work...

amazingly, they never have,


tell us, O Brilliant One?


How many MORE laws on firearms would we have to enact, before this stops?

another 1,000?

5,000?

10,000?

Do we have the military do house to house, to register firearms?

what is your solution?

Make laws that it's illegal to sell to criminals?
already on the books

(criminals dont' care)
They work in other countries, gun laws. The US has by far the highest number of gun deaths than any other developed nation. If America isn't great, this is one reason.
You should check out Chicago. The strictest gun laws in the country. Also highest murder rate per capita in the country.
I'm getting tired of shooting down your ridiculous posts. You must be embarrassed.
When we talk about gun laws, Chicago is a deflection. Chicago is a center for drug cartels. The killings there are related to an intensely serious drug problem. It is not the same as a private citizen, usually white btw, going out and killing dozens of people in a few seconds during a gun spree. Two very unrelated issues. Illegal guns are in circulation in Chicago. True. But they are in circulation because of the illegal drug cartels there. It's a different situation that also needs to be dealt with.
 
Guns are on the black market. Why aren’t you yelling for stiffer penalties for the criminals selling them illegally? Better task forces to get these guys off the streets? Almost 93% of guns used in murders are illegally acquired!
May have very well saved dozens of more lives had he had plans to go on a further shooting spree.
The shooter was a citizen with a gun too. Maybe people with dishonorable discharges shouldn't be able to buy more than a shotgun, 22, muzzle loader or crossbow?

See there could have been a regulation that would have stopped this. No guns for people who are dishonorably discharged.


Actually if the stories about him being dishonorably discharge are true then he wasn't a "citizen with a gun" because in Texas a DD means you can't legally own a firearm. It is the same as a felony conviction.

He was a criminal with an illegal gun. In other words he didn't abide by the existing laws so what makes you Moon Bats think any other law would have stopped him?
You make it easier for him to get a gun not harder
 
Guns are on the black market. Why aren’t you yelling for stiffer penalties for the criminals selling them illegally? Better task forces to get these guys off the streets? Almost 93% of guns used in murders are illegally acquired!
May have very well saved dozens of more lives had he had plans to go on a further shooting spree.
The shooter was a citizen with a gun too. Maybe people with dishonorable discharges shouldn't be able to buy more than a shotgun, 22, muzzle loader or crossbow?

See there could have been a regulation that would have stopped this. No guns for people who are dishonorably discharged.


Actually if the stories about him being dishonorably discharge are true then he wasn't a "citizen with a gun" because in Texas a DD means you can't legally own a firearm. It is the same as a felony conviction.

He was a criminal with an illegal gun. In other words he didn't abide by the existing laws so what makes you Moon Bats think any other law would have stopped him?
You make it easier for him to get a gun not harder
Do it!
 
Boom. Proof that laws don't work. Thank you :clap:


Laws dont' work...

amazingly, they never have,


tell us, O Brilliant One?


How many MORE laws on firearms would we have to enact, before this stops?

another 1,000?

5,000?

10,000?

Do we have the military do house to house, to register firearms?

what is your solution?

Make laws that it's illegal to sell to criminals?
already on the books

(criminals dont' care)
They work in other countries, gun laws. The US has by far the highest number of gun deaths than any other developed nation. If America isn't great, this is one reason.

'Other' countries don't have a 2nd Amendment that allows citizens the right to bear arms.

'Other' countries don't have 400+ million firearms in the hands of their citizens that would have to be confiscated or turned in to make your dream come true

Nobody talks about the millions of legal gun owners that have owned guns for years and never shot anyone or used in any type of crime.

They only want to change the laws because of the hundreds(?) of people that do :rolleyes:
That's an absurd argument. ALL of our laws exist because there are people who do the wrong thing. Most people are not going to murder someone, but we still have laws against murder. Every single law we have is there because of people who do the wrong thing: like drunk driving, like child abuse, and so on. Most people are not drunk drivers, most people don't abuse children, but we still have laws against those things.

And even with those laws in place........SOME people still do the wrong thing by breaking said laws. But nobody is amending those laws (murder, drunk driving, robbery, etc) to make them any tougher......now are they? They're not sensationalizing them either with constant media coverage for hours & days on end, now are they?
 
And yes this is political as the demands for gun control if implemented could have allowed this killer to get away.
Nonsense.

No one is advocating prohibiting citizens from carrying concealed firearms; and any measure seeking to do so would be invalidated, as the courts have held such measures to be un-Constitutional.

At least you’re consistent at being ignorant, wrong, and a liar.


You mean except for California...right? Or the defacto ban in New York.....where they refuse to issue permits.....and where D.C. is slow walking their permits.....you mean except for those...right?
Why do you people pretend that gun laws don't work when they work in other countries?

Actually they don't.......

Gun Facts | Gun Control and Crime in non-US Countries

Do countries with stricter gun laws really have less crime or fewer homicides?

Comparing murder rates and gun ownership across countries - Crime Prevention Research Center
These are not credible sources: they are pro-gun sources. LOL
 
And yes this is political as the demands for gun control if implemented could have allowed this killer to get away.
Nonsense.

No one is advocating prohibiting citizens from carrying concealed firearms; and any measure seeking to do so would be invalidated, as the courts have held such measures to be un-Constitutional.

At least you’re consistent at being ignorant, wrong, and a liar.


You mean except for California...right? Or the defacto ban in New York.....where they refuse to issue permits.....and where D.C. is slow walking their permits.....you mean except for those...right?
Why do you people pretend that gun laws don't work when they work in other countries?

Actually they don't.......

Gun Facts | Gun Control and Crime in non-US Countries

Do countries with stricter gun laws really have less crime or fewer homicides?

Comparing murder rates and gun ownership across countries - Crime Prevention Research Center
These are not credible sources: they are pro-gun sources. LOL

anti gun sources are more reliable?
 
Laws dont' work...

amazingly, they never have,


tell us, O Brilliant One?


How many MORE laws on firearms would we have to enact, before this stops?

another 1,000?

5,000?

10,000?

Do we have the military do house to house, to register firearms?

what is your solution?

Make laws that it's illegal to sell to criminals?
already on the books

(criminals dont' care)
They work in other countries, gun laws. The US has by far the highest number of gun deaths than any other developed nation. If America isn't great, this is one reason.

'Other' countries don't have a 2nd Amendment that allows citizens the right to bear arms.

'Other' countries don't have 400+ million firearms in the hands of their citizens that would have to be confiscated or turned in to make your dream come true

Nobody talks about the millions of legal gun owners that have owned guns for years and never shot anyone or used in any type of crime.

They only want to change the laws because of the hundreds(?) of people that do :rolleyes:
That's an absurd argument. ALL of our laws exist because there are people who do the wrong thing. Most people are not going to murder someone, but we still have laws against murder. Every single law we have is there because of people who do the wrong thing: like drunk driving, like child abuse, and so on. Most people are not drunk drivers, most people don't abuse children, but we still have laws against those things.

And even with those laws in place........SOME people still do the wrong thing by breaking said laws. But nobody is amending those laws (murder, drunk driving, robbery, etc) to make them any tougher......now are they? They're not sensationalizing them either with constant media coverage for hours & days on end, now are they?
Again totally wrong. We have continuously made the laws against drunk driving more severe. Perhaps you are not old enough to know that. We have regularly increased the penalties for robbery, murder and other violent crimes. We have gone from hardly recognizing it as a reality to seriously monitoring it and creating severe penalties for child abuse. I think maybe you are not a very informed or circumspect person.
 
Nonsense.

No one is advocating prohibiting citizens from carrying concealed firearms; and any measure seeking to do so would be invalidated, as the courts have held such measures to be un-Constitutional.

At least you’re consistent at being ignorant, wrong, and a liar.


You mean except for California...right? Or the defacto ban in New York.....where they refuse to issue permits.....and where D.C. is slow walking their permits.....you mean except for those...right?
Why do you people pretend that gun laws don't work when they work in other countries?

Actually they don't.......

Gun Facts | Gun Control and Crime in non-US Countries

Do countries with stricter gun laws really have less crime or fewer homicides?

Comparing murder rates and gun ownership across countries - Crime Prevention Research Center
These are not credible sources: they are pro-gun sources. LOL

anti gun sources are more reliable?
Unbiased sources are reliable. Is the entire world simply black and white to you? Them and us?
 
May have very well saved dozens of more lives had he had plans to go on a further shooting spree.
Your point is so ridiculous, so fucked up. If they guy had not had automatic guns to go in and kill all those people, no one would need a gun to shoot him. You're saying isn't it great we have dentists to fill cavaties when if people took care of their teeth, they wouldn't have cavaties. If we didn't let private citizens have automatic weapons, they couldn't go into a place and kill 26 people in seconds in the first place. You gun nuts are absurd.
How do you "not let" citizens have automatic weapons? Make them illegal? Then, only criminals will have automatic weapons.
Don't quite have all your groceries bagged - doya?
Poor logic and poor knowledge of the facts. In countries with very strict gun laws, guns go out of circulation in general and it is not a fact that only criminals have guns. Criminals can't get a hold of them either.

And another point: someone whose screen name is kill a liberal has absolutely no credibility whatsoever.
Huh? My screename is depicting a muslim smoking a cigarette.
And if you don't think that criminals won't find a way to get guns, they wouldn't be very good criminals. This country has very good criminals. Hillary is a good example.
I'm not talking about your picture, I'm talking about your screen name. It says smoke a lib, which means kill a liberal. And I have reported you.
Lol! Poor little butthurt leftist...
 
May have very well saved dozens of more lives had he had plans to go on a further shooting spree.
Your point is so ridiculous, so fucked up. If they guy had not had automatic guns to go in and kill all those people, no one would need a gun to shoot him. You're saying isn't it great we have dentists to fill cavaties when if people took care of their teeth, they wouldn't have cavaties. If we didn't let private citizens have automatic weapons, they couldn't go into a place and kill 26 people in seconds in the first place. You gun nuts are absurd.
How do you "not let" citizens have automatic weapons? Make them illegal? Then, only criminals will have automatic weapons.
Don't quite have all your groceries bagged - doya?
Poor logic and poor knowledge of the facts. In countries with very strict gun laws, guns go out of circulation in general and it is not a fact that only criminals have guns. Criminals can't get a hold of them either.

And another point: someone whose screen name is kill a liberal has absolutely no credibility whatsoever.
Huh? My screename is depicting a muslim smoking a cigarette.
And if you don't think that criminals won't find a way to get guns, they wouldn't be very good criminals. This country has very good criminals. Hillary is a good example.
I'm not talking about your picture, I'm talking about your screen name. It says smoke a lib, which means kill a liberal. And I have reported you.

Are you on crack? He's been here nearly as long as you have and now because he says something you don't like......you report him? WTF??
 
You mean except for California...right? Or the defacto ban in New York.....where they refuse to issue permits.....and where D.C. is slow walking their permits.....you mean except for those...right?
Why do you people pretend that gun laws don't work when they work in other countries?

Actually they don't.......

Gun Facts | Gun Control and Crime in non-US Countries

Do countries with stricter gun laws really have less crime or fewer homicides?

Comparing murder rates and gun ownership across countries - Crime Prevention Research Center
These are not credible sources: they are pro-gun sources. LOL

anti gun sources are more reliable?
Unbiased sources are reliable. Is the entire world simply black and white to you? Them and us?

what do you consider 'unbiased' in regard to firearms?
 

Forum List

Back
Top