Most recently CNN is reporting that Republican Senators are suggesting to Trump that he not bring up the impeachment in the "State of the Union" address. There are apparently some nerves, some disgust, some unknowns, some disappointments: Enough in the offing to warrant a "No Comment!"
Impeachment trial of President Trump: Live updates - CNNPolitics
That leads anyone to count: Rubio, Collins, Romney, Murkowski, Ernst, Cramer, Graham, and Alexander. Those Senators are Republicans, and accepted the House evidence, and expressed that DJT had done something wrong--that should never been thought able to even be thinkable, much less something that could actually happen. Then that made it only sufficiently imperfect to have warranted the various public expressions of disdain(?)
So at at least there can be a basis hypothetical.
There could be a vote of 44 for exoneration, 55 for condemnation: With basis in 99 Senators voting. That would be actual behavior following apparent disdain. That would tend to be supportive of the nationwide polling.
Then in Holy Exoneration: The Republicans could get back to separating infants from mothers at the border(?)! History is often said repetitive.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
(So if 3000 males were killed in matter of the Golden Calf, and 6 mil. gender all-encompassing were killed in the matter of Deut. 23:19-20, (Usury Economics): Could it be said that something was at least madly wrong?!? Does anyone notice any claims of social progress and justice(?)!)
Impeachment trial of President Trump: Live updates - CNNPolitics
That leads anyone to count: Rubio, Collins, Romney, Murkowski, Ernst, Cramer, Graham, and Alexander. Those Senators are Republicans, and accepted the House evidence, and expressed that DJT had done something wrong--that should never been thought able to even be thinkable, much less something that could actually happen. Then that made it only sufficiently imperfect to have warranted the various public expressions of disdain(?)
So at at least there can be a basis hypothetical.
There could be a vote of 44 for exoneration, 55 for condemnation: With basis in 99 Senators voting. That would be actual behavior following apparent disdain. That would tend to be supportive of the nationwide polling.
Then in Holy Exoneration: The Republicans could get back to separating infants from mothers at the border(?)! History is often said repetitive.
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
(So if 3000 males were killed in matter of the Golden Calf, and 6 mil. gender all-encompassing were killed in the matter of Deut. 23:19-20, (Usury Economics): Could it be said that something was at least madly wrong?!? Does anyone notice any claims of social progress and justice(?)!)
