A suggested rule to improve moderation

[bodecea]

It USED to be the policy as you suggested...some mods blew right past that.

I am aware that moderators are members who are free to engage, just like any member, in a thread of interest.

The problem comes in when a moderator puts on her “member” hat to oppose or debate the OP (or any poster, really), and retains moderator capabilities to delete posts or move the entire thread to Badlands when it was originally started in a Zone 1 forum.

I suggest the following: any time a moderator is a participant on a thread - ESPECIALLY when debating the OP’s premise - she cannot simultaneously moderate that thread. The bias is obvious and she cannot objectively do to her “job.”

 

[L.K.Eder]

You can always be counted on for content free personal attacks whenever a thread involves certain people.

It must be a coincidence.

seems like a You problem, geriatric fucktard.

 

[progressive hunter]

I am aware that moderators are members who are free to engage, just like any member, in a thread of interest.

The problem comes in when a moderator puts on her “member” hat to oppose or debate the OP (or any poster, really), and retains moderator capabilities to delete posts or move the entire thread to Badlands when it was originally started in a Zone 1 forum.

I suggest the following: any time a moderator is a participant on a thread - ESPECIALLY when debating the OP’s premise - she cannot simultaneously moderate that thread. The bias is obvious and she cannot objectively do to her “job.”

I was told a memo went out to all mods they were not to moderate a thread they are a part of,,

it seems none of them got the memo,,

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I was told a memo went out to all mods they were not to moderate a thread they are a part of,,

it seems none of them got the memo,,

Doncha know man, when a malignant narcissist abuses the power given them, the way the board demands we deal with it is to go straight to the malignant narcissist.

 

[L.K.Eder]

it's a shame how this right wing board catering to extreme right wing scumbags is persecuting right wing scumbags. not fair.

 

[Blaster]

Posting better stuff is always the answer. Post better. Be better.

Yes, you definitely should post better stuff. Just saying.

 

[hjmick]

Jesus Christ... not this shit again...


Bunch of fucking children...

 

[Unkotare]

End birthright citizenship.


View attachment 837728

If you want to repeal the 14th Amendment, contact your representatives. Don't just bitch about it here. And it remains true that there is no such thing as an "anchor baby."

 

[Ropey]

It's not the 14, you're no slave.

 

[candycorn]

I am aware that moderators are members who are free to engage, just like any member, in a thread of interest.

The problem comes in when a moderator puts on her “member” hat to oppose or debate the OP (or any poster, really), and retains moderator capabilities to delete posts or move the entire thread to Badlands when it was originally started in a Zone 1 forum.

I suggest the following: any time a moderator is a participant on a thread - ESPECIALLY when debating the OP’s premise - she cannot simultaneously moderate that thread. The bias is obvious and she cannot objectively do to her “job.”

Let me guess. You acted in your usual snide manner, went over the line, were slapped down and are now trying to change the rules so you can continue being yourself.

 

[candycorn]

I am aware that moderators are members who are free to engage, just like any member, in a thread of interest.

The problem comes in when a moderator puts on her “member” hat to oppose or debate the OP (or any poster, really), and retains moderator capabilities to delete posts or move the entire thread to Badlands when it was originally started in a Zone 1 forum.

I suggest the following: any time a moderator is a participant on a thread - ESPECIALLY when debating the OP’s premise - she cannot simultaneously moderate that thread. The bias is obvious and she cannot objectively do to her “job.”

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Let me guess. You acted in your usual snide manner, went over the line, were slapped down and are now trying to change the rules so you can continue being yourself.

Having an IQ 40 or 50 points higher than you doesn't mean a person is snide.

 

[Unkotare]

...you're no slave.

No, I'm not.

 

[Unkotare]

It's not the 14,...

The USSC disagrees with you.

 

[Ropey]

THe USSC doesn't talk.

 

[Unkotare]

THe USSC doesn't talk.

I didn't say "talk."

 

[Ropey]

I didn't say "talk."

Then the SSC couldn't disagree or agree.

tia

 

[Unkotare]

Then the SSC couldn't disagree or agree.

tia

Of course it can.

It's ok to stop digging now.

 

[Ropey]

It can't.

That's why there is a Judicial branch.

 

[Unkotare]

It can't.

That's why there is a Judicial branch.

Still digging? It's not working for ya.