ABC Panel Erupts Into Chaos After Chris Christie Dismantles the Credibility of Jan. 6 Committee

[scruffy]

306>232... Reality.

You do agree with reality, right Blart?

Say the name of your president if you do....

You have 21 more days to peddle this bullshit.

Knock yourself out.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

My guess is your response to being proven wrong will be to claim FactCheck.Org is biased. But you won't be able to refute, in a credible way, the facts they use to make their case.

FactChecking Claims About Asylum Grants and Immigration Court Attendance - FactCheck.org

While discussing ways to quickly determine if people who cross into the U.S. through Mexico are eligible for asylum, Sen. Rob Portman claimed that “only about half of them even show up for their court cases” and “only 15% of them qualify” for asylum. But government statistics aren't that clear-cut.

www.factcheck.org

Homeland Security chief says 90% of asylum seekers miss court dates

The acting Homeland Security secretary said on Tuesday that 90 percent of asylum seekers are missing their court dates after being released into the US. Acting Secretary Kevin McAleenan told the Se…

nypost.com

 

[toobfreak]

Trump said to "march peacefully" to the Capital, and to "fight like hell" when they got there. And he told them to "fight" more than 10 times

So now anyone who tells a group to fight like hell for what they believe in is now criminally liable? Democrats like Maxine Waters told that to people at least a hundred times and the end result was two or three people shot with rifles and another one run over dead, so I guess that makes them all murderers by your standard.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Why not? He's trying to remain relevant with the base to advance his political prospects. So he goes on national TV trying to give credibility to the specious assertion that poor Don is being railroaded. When we know with 100% certainty that is not so. The idea that a lack of Trump loyalists on the panel changes anything of consequence is disingenuous at its best.

He's 100% right on. This is a show trial and nothing more. That's why they hired an entertainment CEO to conduct this clown show. Mind you, I'm no Christie fan, but when somebody is right, they're right. He and Trump has had their fallouts since he left the White House, so he's no Trump kiss ass either. And what political prospects? He's been out of politics for a few years now.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

McConnell's issues began when President Obama first took his oath of office. Packing the Supreme Court by McConnell handcuffed Civil Rights and liberal Democratic Policies.

You and others scream "Socialism" has created fear and led many to believe the ACA is good, but Obamacare is totalitarianism.

This is Trump and Trumpism ^^^ that will damage Democracy in America for decades too. BIG LIES and Conspiracy Fictions are being posted on social (really, anti-social) media when you and others echo the same maladies that existed for decades and blame it all on Biden.

Who was screaming Commie Care was good? Did you have a blindfold on when you heard those screams? Not one Republican voted for it. Please explain the dynamics how Republicans calling Commie Care socialism got people to support it.

How did McConnell pack the Supreme Court? We still have the same amount of justices we've had for well over 100 years. Now if you're talking about Garland, how good of a call was that seeing what he's actually about today. He would have ruled in favor of every deep state issue. I don't even like McConnell.

 

[notmyfault2020]

No one believes their bullshit anymore.

THEY don't even believe it anymore.

probably never did. I sometimes wonder what the hell their schtick really is.. but then I realize that's all it is, a phony schtick

They know the people are tired of it.. so why do they keep running w/ it?

oh yeh.. the old Let's steal it plan..

 

[Polishprince]

Christie lays it out. The committee is a kangaroo court:

​

ABC Panel Erupts Into Chaos After Chris Christie Dismantles the Credibility of Jan. 6 Committee

redstate.com

​

​

Former Gov. Chris Christie created a firestorm on ABC News’ “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” on Sunday, with what he had to say about the Jan. 6 Committee. Christie pointed out that, to many Republicans, the Committee doesn’t have any credibility. That’s because they don’t have any real Republicans on the Committee to make any points against the Democratic narrative.​

​

The January 6 committee was “resigned to having a credibility problem because of the membership of the committee and the way that was done,” Christie opened by saying.​

​

“There are lots of Republicans across this country who just say, there’s nobody there to argue the other side. Kinzinger and Cheney don’t argue the other side to the extent that there is [sic] some arguments there,” Christie added before both anchor George Stephanopoulos and Brazile jumped down his throat.​

​

That comment sparked outrage from host George Stephanopoulos and fellow panelist Donna Brazile, both of whom have been Democratic operatives.​

​

...​

​

Stephanopoulos claimed there was “no other side,” and Brazile demanded to know, “What is the other side?” Christie spoke about the ability to grill the witnesses, something they would normally have at a hearing, which is missing here. Instead, he said, accurately, it was a television production. Brazile just kept shouting at Christie and would barely let him get in a word edgewise.​

​

When he finally got the chance to speak, Christie said, “There are lots of people inside the White House who now have convenient memories about things that didn’t have memories about them before.” But, the Trump team/Republicans weren’t given that option because that’s not allowed, to challenge the narrative. You’re not allowed to know that Trump spoke about acting “peacefully and patriotically” at his rally before the riot. You’re not allowed to question why Democrats didn’t conduct this like a normal hearing.​

​

But this is the Democrats’ view in general. Trump is guilty of pushing an “insurrection”–because they say so. He isn’t entitled to a defense. It doesn’t matter what he said, or what evidence might rebut their presumptions. They don’t believe in the rule of law, just the rule of the narrative. That’s why everyone on the Committee — including the Republicans — was already solidly anti-Trump, picked for their bias. That’s why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in an unprecedented move, rejected members who were picked by the Republican side who might have questioned the Democrats.​

​

The last person who should be talking about “credibility” is Donna Brazile. Can anyone forget how Brazile divulged debate questions to Clinton camp officials during the Democratic primaries in the 2016 race? Even the left excoriated her​

​

...​

​

But Christie accurately noted it’s because of that basic unfairness about the formation of the Committee, that most of America have turned the Committee off. They know it’s about trying to get Trump, not about the riot or the rule of law.​

​

“t’s very hard for Democrats to be able to make this a cutting issue, especially in the light of huge inflation, gas prices, crime in the streets, open borders, drug overdoses, those things are things that are affecting people’s everyday lives and they don’t see it that way,” Christie reasoned.​

​

That’s the bottom line. Democrats are pushing issues that aren’t the top issues of concern to voters. They thought they would use Jan. 6 to smear Republicans. But people know it’s a biased show; it’s backfiring on them because voters don’t think they care about anything else, including the issues that are most important to Americans.​

I think the important thing to note here is that Chris Fucking Christie is no particularly close friend of the Trumpster and they have had points of disagreement over the years.

Yet he still recognizes a Kangaroo Court.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

What created Inflation? When did the Border issue first begin? When did the opiate crisis commence?

When has the Republican Party posted any effort to put forth policies to correct each one of these issues?

First issue is the border wall which Trump managed to sneak by. 460 miles of new or replacement wall along our border is quite an anti illegals move. Next Trump told Mexico if they don't stop people crossing their country to get to ours, they risk losing their US financial aid. Mexico sent their military out to their other borders to stop that flow. Trump's new immigration policy was to apply for asylum in your own country at their US embassy. If you didn't do that and made it to our border, but were offered asylum by any other country and refused, that was automatic disqualification for US asylum. And of course the most effective move of all, Trump's stay in Mexico policy.

Inflation is defined by paying more money for the same products and services than you did before. After Dementia got in, he passed the additional unemployment bill that Trump refused to sign. Paying people more to stay home than work left hurting businesses with no other choice than to greatly increase pay offers. Because of the huge increase in gasoline and diesel, those costs also get passed down to our manufacturers. And trust me as a retired truck driver, those costs are huge.

Because fuel generally increases together, businesses also had to pay much higher rates for heat and electricity just like we all are doing for our homes now. Then we add in the spending on the most ridiculous things like climate change garbage. Dementia is less than two years into his term and they already spent close to 5 trillion dollars, and the college bailout (another half-trillion) isn't even in that estimate yet.

Add it all up, we have out of control inflation.

 

[366h34d]

It seems you have not watched a single minute of the Special Committee. No one who watched and listen to the testimonies - of disaffected Republicans, or those who testified under oath - could refute both Christie and you.

testifying under oath, only means you say what you "know". You just need to ask amber heard, it does not mean you are right.

 

[Kondor3]

Christie lays it out. The committee is a kangaroo court:

​

ABC Panel Erupts Into Chaos After Chris Christie Dismantles the Credibility of Jan. 6 Committee

redstate.com

​

​

Former Gov. Chris Christie created a firestorm on ABC News’ “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” on Sunday, with what he had to say about the Jan. 6 Committee. Christie pointed out that, to many Republicans, the Committee doesn’t have any credibility. That’s because they don’t have any real Republicans on the Committee to make any points against the Democratic narrative.​

​

The January 6 committee was “resigned to having a credibility problem because of the membership of the committee and the way that was done,” Christie opened by saying.​

​

“There are lots of Republicans across this country who just say, there’s nobody there to argue the other side. Kinzinger and Cheney don’t argue the other side to the extent that there is [sic] some arguments there,” Christie added before both anchor George Stephanopoulos and Brazile jumped down his throat.​

​

That comment sparked outrage from host George Stephanopoulos and fellow panelist Donna Brazile, both of whom have been Democratic operatives.​

​

...​

​

Stephanopoulos claimed there was “no other side,” and Brazile demanded to know, “What is the other side?” Christie spoke about the ability to grill the witnesses, something they would normally have at a hearing, which is missing here. Instead, he said, accurately, it was a television production. Brazile just kept shouting at Christie and would barely let him get in a word edgewise.​

​

When he finally got the chance to speak, Christie said, “There are lots of people inside the White House who now have convenient memories about things that didn’t have memories about them before.” But, the Trump team/Republicans weren’t given that option because that’s not allowed, to challenge the narrative. You’re not allowed to know that Trump spoke about acting “peacefully and patriotically” at his rally before the riot. You’re not allowed to question why Democrats didn’t conduct this like a normal hearing.​

​

But this is the Democrats’ view in general. Trump is guilty of pushing an “insurrection”–because they say so. He isn’t entitled to a defense. It doesn’t matter what he said, or what evidence might rebut their presumptions. They don’t believe in the rule of law, just the rule of the narrative. That’s why everyone on the Committee — including the Republicans — was already solidly anti-Trump, picked for their bias. That’s why House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in an unprecedented move, rejected members who were picked by the Republican side who might have questioned the Democrats.​

​

The last person who should be talking about “credibility” is Donna Brazile. Can anyone forget how Brazile divulged debate questions to Clinton camp officials during the Democratic primaries in the 2016 race? Even the left excoriated her​

​

...​

​

But Christie accurately noted it’s because of that basic unfairness about the formation of the Committee, that most of America have turned the Committee off. They know it’s about trying to get Trump, not about the riot or the rule of law.​

​

“t’s very hard for Democrats to be able to make this a cutting issue, especially in the light of huge inflation, gas prices, crime in the streets, open borders, drug overdoses, those things are things that are affecting people’s everyday lives and they don’t see it that way,” Christie reasoned.​

​

That’s the bottom line. Democrats are pushing issues that aren’t the top issues of concern to voters. They thought they would use Jan. 6 to smear Republicans. But people know it’s a biased show; it’s backfiring on them because voters don’t think they care about anything else, including the issues that are most important to Americans.​

Fat Boy barks... RumpBots listen? That's a switch...

 

[Dragonlady]

You are a liar.

link to him saying “March peacefully to the Capital and fight like hell”.

Watch Dragonlady squirm.

That's not what I said. I never linked those to phrases together, but you did you lying piece of shit.

He said "March peacefully to the capital", once in that entire speech and "fight like hell" more than 10 times.

 

[Dragonlady]

testifying under oath, only means you say what you "know". You just need to ask amber heard, it does not mean you are right.

That's because Heard was lying, and wasn't credible. The evidence didn't back up her testimony. The Committee didn't put anyone on TV who wasn't credible, and whose testimony couldn't be verified by other sources or documents.

Notice how Trump Secret Service guy who you claimed would refute the story of Trump grabbing the wheel, never testified, and quit before having to speak to the Committee. Not once did he ever deny that story under oath.

 

[Coyote]

You are a liar.

link to him saying “March peacefully to the Capital and fight like hell”.

Watch Dragonlady squirm.

What Dragonlady actually said:
Especial that "peacefully" horseshit. Trump said to "march peacefully" to the Capital, and to "fight like hell" when they got there.

From his speech…

”…We fight like hell. And if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore…”

Literally what he said.

“I know that everyone here will soon be marching over to the Capitol building to peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

Not literal, but close enough that meaning doesn’t change.


Why should Dragonlady squirm?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

306>232... Reality.

You do agree with reality, right Blart?

Say the name of your president if you do....

Blart you aren't part of reality youre delusional

 

[BULLDOG]

These 8 States Allow Abortion Up To The Moment Of Birth | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

And which of those states allow partial birth abortion?

 

[beagle9]

If the Republicans take the House next month which is highly likely and start up committee hearings into Hunter biden's business dealings and any involvement Joe Biden might have had in them and conduct it in the same way the Democrats did the January 6th committe I suspect people on both sides will have very different views on the credibility of said committe. Those who supported the 1-6 committe will not support this one and those who did not support the 1-6 committe will support this one.

The only differences will be that the 1/6 hearing was a witch hunt, and the other one with the name Biden attached to it is the real stinker. Hopefully America has finally wised up. Good grief already. It's time to call a spade a spade, and get to prosecuting the real culprit's who have set this COUNTRY on fire.

 

[366h34d]

That's because Heard was lying, and wasn't credible. The evidence didn't back up her testimony. The Committee didn't put anyone on TV who wasn't credible, and whose testimony couldn't be verified by other sources or documents.

Notice how Trump Secret Service guy who you claimed would refute the story of Trump grabbing the wheel, never testified, and quit before having to speak to the Committee. Not once did he ever deny that story under oath.

Was she under oath?

 

[Nostra]

It's you and the GOP who have made this wedge issue on social media and used it to the foolish. The Biden Administration has followed the laws of immigration. What do you think you need to do, get whips and slash the backs of all the women and children running away from poverty and gangs?

You claimed the GOP is lying about the border, Simp.

Stop dodging and link us up to the lies you claim.

GO Rye Catcher

 

[Nostra]

Nice piece of sophistry, sadly there is more to the policies the Biden/Harris Administration attempted to pass. McConnell and the Senate don't allow an up and down vote.

McConnell doesn’t run the Senate, Halfwit.

 

[Nostra]

That's because Heard was lying, and wasn't credible. The evidence didn't back up her testimony. The Committee didn't put anyone on TV who wasn't credible, and whose testimony couldn't be verified by other sources or documents.

Notice how Trump Secret Service guy who you claimed would refute the story of Trump grabbing the wheel, never testified, and quit before having to speak to the Committee. Not once did he ever deny that story under oath.

The Agents offered to testify, the SS said they could.

Nazi Piglosi didn’t want their testimony on record, so they never asked them to testify.

Grow a brain, Fuckwit.