Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Very generous of you. If the pill doesn't work, it would still be the woman's choice.
But if you really care about the issue at all, you should lobby your state to provide easy access to this pill.
If you feel abortion is immoral, then argue it on those grounds. Don't trot out a silly and unworkable compromise.
It's not merely a matter of being immoral. Hell, if that were the case then I would not argue that such would be an option in my MUTUAL compromise. BUT, to suggest that ONLY a woman should make the decision because a child is too much of a burden on her is a crock of shit.
You know what else is a burden? prison. People who murder other human beings should remember that.
I actually think that adopted kids = genetic heirs.
I understand that a man may wish this, but I don't find that compelling. Do you find it compelling that a woman doesn't wish it?
As for alimony, this is again a separate issue. If you feel alimony laws treat men unfairly, then argue for changing those laws.
hey Jill,
My wife really doesn't think it's fair that I get to pee standing up while she has to sit down. Do you think we could get Shoggie here to craft a master compromise that could usher in a brave new world of equality?
Show me how giving someone your sperm gives you the deciding rule.
I've never become pregnant except by express design. You should never impregnate anyone except by express design. If you do, be prepared to deal with the fact that you cannot force a woman to bear your child.
That's a bit better, though your link still doesn't say what you want it to. The article discusses that some men COMPLAIN that child support is used to pay for the ex's lifestyle, but concludes.....
Try again, babe. You might hit it at some point.
yea, Jill.. men pointing out how their "child support" only facilitates a baby mamma standard of living really is just like the elusive fucking bigfoot.
You're kidding, right?
hey Jill,
My wife really doesn't think it's fair that I get to pee standing up while she has to sit down. Do you think we could get Shoggie here to craft a master compromise that could usher in a brave new world of equality?
Except that's not what your article said.
Yet it conveys much of the same to what I'm talking about. Of course it's not going to explore an idea that I am bringing to this thread exclusively, jill.
No. It doesn't. It says "men complain" that women live better on child support and goes on to talk about how men and women pay DIFFERENTLY, but each pays.
Go back and read.
NO, the oint is to allow men the same perogative as a woman in the death of their mutual child since they both made the very same zipper decision.
And so what? it has everything to do with this discussion insomuch that tired ass rhetoric and behemoth accusations won't overturn savvy legislation that totally sidesteps RvW. 30 years of fucked up kids that are the product of judical vagina worship is a relevant reason to let fatherts have input in their kids' lives beyond merely being a source for cable tv money and a lifestyle. If a woman knows that her pussy is not so lucrative then perhaps, PERHAPS we can circumvent the abortion issue with a little MUTUAL SEXUAL RESPONSIBILITY.
I mean, blaming a man for not wearing a condom really is the root of all excuses.
I find it compelling that there is such a stark acception to a blatant double standard according to gender. Name one fucking thing that a man gets full rights to that is as significant as his child. one fucking thing.
and, again, it may be your OPINION that adpted kids = genetic offspring but such is not a universally held belief, obviously.
what the hell do you think "MEN COMPLAIN" means to a man supporting the standard of living of a baby mamma?
ps,
Public Opinion Supports Alito on Spousal Notification Even as It Favors Roe v. Wade
Pew Research Center Pollwatch
