🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Abortion amendment?

That’s their business, and if they’re poor, maybe don’t have more kids than you can afford, but of course that means don’t make more kids, not kill your kids which is what you pro-aborts want.


More like an end.


None of your business what businesses want to offer and what prospective employees would accept. “First world” must translate to authoritarian trash.


Canada is a barbaric hellscape, a shithole beyond saving.


Stupid. Profoundly stupid. Insane,

Punishing those who choose to kill other humans is not punishing anyone for having sex.

Canada is the best country in the world to live in. The USA is barely in the top 20 and dropping every year.

We have half your abortion rate, 1/7 the murder rate, and we're not even all that religious. Our poverty rate is 1/3 what yours is and we have the fastest growing middle class in the world. So we seem to be doing a lot of things right.

A thriving and healthy middle class is necessary for a successful capitalist economy - as is a strong social safety net. Republican policies have destroyed the American middle class, and shredded the social safety net.

You claim to want to end abortion, but this post is proof positive that this is NOT your goal at all. You're just directing your hate at women.
 
Canada is the best country in the world to live in. The USA is barely in the top 20 and dropping every year.

We have half your abortion rate, 1/7 the murder rate, and we're not even all that religious. Our poverty rate is 1/3 what yours is and we have the fastest growing middle class in the world. So we seem to be doing a lot of things right.

A thriving and healthy middle class is necessary for a successful capitalist economy - as is a strong social safety net. Republican policies have destroyed the American middle class, and shredded the social safety net.

You claim to want to end abortion, but this post is proof positive that this is NOT your goal at all. You're just directing your hate at women.

So live there and leave us alone. Stupid bitch
 
You can't tell people to not have children they can't afford, and then refuse them the ability to terminate a pregnancy they can't afford.
Yeah, I can, retard, I just did.

Don’t make kids if you can’t support them, obviously, duh.

Just because you can’t support them doesn’t oblige anyone else to pay for your fuck accessories and it sure as shit doesn’t oblige anyone to let you kill kids let alone make us all murderers by making us pay for someone else to kill your kid.

That’s buffoonish clown world territory, only it’s also monstrous and sociopathic, so more like Joker or Pennywise. Actually, Joker is kind of amusing still, and you’re just not, so let’s stick with Pennywise the demonic-esque alien serial killer thing that eats children, that seems a fitting avatar for you and your antics.
 
Last edited:
Canada is the best country in the world to live in.
It’s a frozen authoritarian nightmare where protests are put down with martial law by your socialist dictator; you have no right to self-defense, you have no right to free speech, you have no right to protest, you have no right to life certainly not, you are encouraged to die or kill at taxpayer expense because they want you to die.

And since your own shithole government wants Canuckistani trash like you to die, and you still support them, who am I to argue? Maybe they’re right, at least in some cases.



You're just directing your hate at women.
Insanity.

Just don’t kill kids. If you do, you belong in prison.

If you think that is “hate at women,” read better, retard.
 
You can't tell people to not have children they can't afford, and then refuse them the ability to terminate a pregnancy they can't afford. All while refusing them universal access to birth control or reproductive health care.
This is why no one takes you seriously on the subject of abortion.
So you agree:
"Shall not be infringed" = no constitutionally permissible restrictions.
Good to know.
 
Do you believe the pro-choice crowd will agree that "post viability" restrictions are not infringements on the right to an abortion?
I wonder if the pro-choice crowd that believe a woman who had an abortion because it was best for herself, would agree with the father's for abandoning their children because it was best for themselves.
 
I wonder if the pro-choice crowd that believe a woman who had an abortion because it was best for herself, would agree with the father's for abandoning their children because it was best for themselves.

The two choices aren’t even remotely similar because one of them involves living, breathing children and the other one involves a piece of tissue that will not grow up wondering why Dad left.
 
The two choices aren’t even remotely similar because one of them involves living, breathing children and the other one involves a piece of tissue that will not grow up wondering why Dad left.
The place of child to me is not important to me, inside the womb or outside the womb, they're a person/baby/child/human.

To help you, the father leaves the pregnant mother, because he feels it's in his best interest.
 
The place of child to me is not important to me, inside the womb or outside the womb, they're a person/baby/child/human.

To help you, the father leaves the pregnant mother, because he feels it's in his best interest.

Too bad he doesn’t leave her before taking responsibility for his actions. If he didn’t want to have a child, why wasn’t he wearing a condom?

Women are stuck with all of the responsibilities in bearing and raising the child that was only conceived because Dad wanted to get laid. If Dad didn’t want to have a baby, why wasn’t he wearing a condom or otherwise protecting himself from that potential outcome?

All too often, the women think that they’re creating a family, and by the time they realize that that sentiment is completely one-sided, it’s too late for them to make a different choice.
 
Too bad he doesn’t leave her before taking responsibility for his actions. If he didn’t want to have a child, why wasn’t he wearing a condom?

Women are stuck with all of the responsibilities in bearing and raising the child that was only conceived because Dad wanted to get laid. If Dad didn’t want to have a baby, why wasn’t he wearing a condom or otherwise protecting himself from that potential outcome?

All too often, the women think that they’re creating a family, and by the time they realize that that sentiment is completely one-sided, it’s too late for them to make a different choice.
Too bad the woman isn't responsible before getting pregnant, then the whole topic wouldn't be here. But there we go. My body my choice but make the choice before conceiving. Rocket science isn't it.
 
Too bad he doesn’t leave her before taking responsibility for his actions. If he didn’t want to have a child, why wasn’t he wearing a condom?

Women are stuck with all of the responsibilities in bearing and raising the child that was only conceived because Dad wanted to get laid. If Dad didn’t want to have a baby, why wasn’t he wearing a condom or otherwise protecting himself from that potential outcome?

All too often, the women think that they’re creating a family, and by the time they realize that that sentiment is completely one-sided, it’s too late for them to make a different choice.
And, to you , all of this means it is OK to end and innocent human life.
 

Forum List

Back
Top