K
KGB
Guest
What are you blathering about? It is physically attached to the woman, draining her body of nutrients to sustain its life.
oh, so you agree that the unborn child is not a part of the woman's body, excellent. More importantly, you agree that it is also alive. So please explain how you can justify murdering it because of some misguided notion of a "right"....
see this is what the so-called "pro-choice" crowd can never get their minds wrapped around. This unborn child is NOT a part of a woman's body, it is a separate entity that temporarily resides inside it. But it is a alive & it is human.
It is attached to her body, it is a part of her body until it is born. What do you call an umbilical cord?
an unborn child's feeding tube. The child isn't a part of her body since it does not share the exact same genetics as the mother. It is a separate human being that is being nourished by the mother.