Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he doesn't want a kid he can terminate his parental rights and won't be legally obligated.
If he doesn't want a kid he can terminate his parental rights and won't be legally obligated.
That's true....
But what if he doesn't WANT his child murdered? Sounds like everyone is thinking the man NEVER wants to have that child, but that's not true. If the woman doesn't want it, but the man does....what then?
Abortion is not murder, no matter how many time you repeat that lie.
Oh. On page one.
So why are you still here? *discussing* without taking a stance? How does that work?
What is your legal expertise, Prof?
If he doesn't want a kid he can terminate his parental rights and won't be legally obligated.
Ah..there was this brilliant post...which is patently untrue.....was this your opinion? Or just a lie?
Oh. On page one.
So why are you still here? *discussing* without taking a stance? How does that work?
What is your legal expertise, Prof?
No people quote me and ask a question, I answer it.
Abortion is legal, I don't need a law degree to tell that information.
People can petition a court to terminate their parental rights.
Don't need a law degree to pass on that information either.
If he doesn't want a kid he can terminate his parental rights and won't be legally obligated.
Ah..there was this brilliant post...which is patently untrue.....was this your opinion? Or just a lie?
It is not untrue anyone can petition the court to have their parental rights terminated.
If it is granted like it is in some cases of adoption, that person has no legal or financial obligation to the child.
Ah..there was this brilliant post...which is patently untrue.....was this your opinion? Or just a lie?
It is not untrue anyone can petition the court to have their parental rights terminated.
If it is granted like it is in some cases of adoption, that person has no legal or financial obligation to the child.
Good grief shut up already. That horse is freaking dead.
Oh. On page one.
So why are you still here? *discussing* without taking a stance? How does that work?
What is your legal expertise, Prof?
No people quote me and ask a question, I answer it.
Abortion is legal, I don't need a law degree to tell that information.
People can petition a court to terminate their parental rights.
Don't need a law degree to pass on that information either.
Yes, we all know abortion is legal. You need to step up your game. You're stuck in a rut, einstein.
People can petition a court to terminate their parental rights. But that is by no means a guarantee that their parental rights will actually be terminated. Nobody would ever owe child support if that were true.
What is your purpose here? Just to utter inane untruths?
Because men don't get pregnant, that's why. They have no say in whether the woman has an abortion, because he isn't pregnant, and the pregnancy doesn't involve his body. She gets to make the decision.
What QUESTIONS did you ask? I wasn't aware I was responding to any question.
Why don't you answer mine? What is your purpose in this thread, if you have no opinion?
"legal information" hahaha
You're a fucking troll. Time to shut up, moron.
My orginal post was all about U.S. law. Women claim "It's my body" but shouldn't men be able to claim "Well it's my fetus" since they are finanically obligated? Or emotionally devoted to it and want no abortion no matter what the woman says. Whether men want to keep it or not should be their legal option also don't you think?
I want to say that I would never abort a child, I am absolutely pro-life. I just want to discuss the one sided laws on this issue. In my opinion men have lost equality here and they're getting screwed.
My orginal post was all about U.S. law. Women claim "It's my body" but shouldn't men be able to claim "Well it's my fetus" since they are finanically obligated? Or emotionally devoted to it and want no abortion no matter what the woman says. Whether men want to keep it or not should be their legal option also don't you think?
I want to say that I would never abort a child, I am absolutely pro-life. I just want to discuss the one sided laws on this issue. In my opinion men have lost equality here and they're getting screwed.
(My bold)
Well, if the pregnancy is discovered early enough, the blastocyte can be harvested for either implantation in another uterus, or flash frozen for later implantation. The technology isn't absolutely foolproof, but it gets better with time. That is one way that a prospective father could have his rights in the fetus - if the prospective mother & the court agree.
The second point is harder to discuss. What "equality" have men lost? They never could/did carry the fetus to term - so that hasn't changed. Did they previously have a voice in whether the pregnant woman carried to term? I don't think so - & so that hasn't changed either. So what are we talking about - what does "lost equality" actually mean?
(My bold)
Well, if the pregnancy is discovered early enough, the blastocyte can be harvested for either implantation in another uterus, or flash frozen for later implantation. The technology isn't absolutely foolproof, but it gets better with time. That is one way that a prospective father could have his rights in the fetus - if the prospective mother & the court agree.
The second point is harder to discuss. What "equality" have men lost? They never could/did carry the fetus to term - so that hasn't changed. Did they previously have a voice in whether the pregnant woman carried to term? I don't think so - & so that hasn't changed either. So what are we talking about - what does "lost equality" actually mean?
It's simple, at this point the woman has all the options, the man has none. Why should the man not have the option of relinquishing all moral and financial responsibility, just as the woman can through abortion, if he has no desire to be a father?