Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A person who has no business being a "mom," that's who. Women who want to be mothers are not the ones having abortions. Some people (a LOT of people actually) have other issues obviously. Do we want to force these kinds of people to be parents against their wills? Or to carry out a pregnancy?
I mean, people say, "they are irresponsible, they are irresponsible!" Well, there is no greater responsibility in the world than raising a child, IMO. So, these people do what is right for them. Perhaps it's not worth the health risks, perhaps they have some other issues.
I am certainly NOT falling for the old line that these people care about the babies though. That's bullshit as exhibited by their behaviors when it comes to their tax monies going to help these unwanted babies and children.
You can kill this human above and be "okay" with it? Really?
Fucking WOW! Did you write for the Nazis and Herr Hitler? Switch "It Is". with "Jews are".The brain is not developed into a human brain. There is no consciousness. There is no voluntary motion. The exterior features have a human appearance, but what is inside has no feelings, no thoughts. It is not a person.
You can kill this human above and be "okay" with it? Really?
That's not a choice that you are entitled to make for another woman. It is a very personal decision and should not be reliant upon government or other people's opinions on the matter.
A person who has no business being a "mom," that's who. Women who want to be mothers are not the ones having abortions. Some people (a LOT of people actually) have other issues obviously. Do we want to force these kinds of people to be parents against their wills? Or to carry out a pregnancy?
I mean, people say, "they are irresponsible, they are irresponsible!" Well, there is no greater responsibility in the world than raising a child, IMO. So, these people do what is right for them. Perhaps it's not worth the health risks, perhaps they have some other issues.
I am certainly NOT falling for the old line that these people care about the babies though. That's bullshit as exhibited by their behaviors when it comes to their tax monies going to help these unwanted babies and children.
I agree with your premise, not your conclusion. There are obviously millions of people who should not have had kids, and I am not full of grief for the loss of babies that have been murdered by their own mothers out of convenience. Such sociopaths should have been sterilized during the procedure just in case.
However I don't agree that the people you claim are unwilling to part with tax money resent doing so because they have no compassion for the babies. They resent the waste of the money, because the lives of these children are wasted due to the incompetence of the state. I am very confident that many of these babies could be adopted, and would be adopted if not for state agencies that seem reluctant to allow a baby to be adopted by parents who might spank them, or teach them Christian beliefs.
You can kill this human above and be "okay" with it? Really?
That's not a choice that you are entitled to make for another woman. It is a very personal decision and should not be reliant upon government or other people's opinions on the matter.
It may have had more impact had they allowed the picture.
It's easier for you (and others) to put their heads in the sand...
You can kill this human above and be "okay" with it? Really?
That's not a choice that you are entitled to make for another woman. It is a very personal decision and should not be reliant upon government or other people's opinions on the matter.
It may have had more impact had they allowed the picture.
It's easier for you (and others) to put their heads in the sand...
Hey, let's not make this personal. This is not about me. I have not, nor would I, have an abortion but it is not up to me to tell another woman that she should not. That is her decision and her decision alone (maybe the man's too).
You can kill this human above and be "okay" with it? Really?
That's not a choice that you are entitled to make for another woman. It is a very personal decision and should not be reliant upon government or other people's opinions on the matter.
It may have had more impact had they allowed the picture.
It's easier for you (and others) to put their heads in the sand...
Hey, let's not make this personal. This is not about me. I have not, nor would I, have an abortion but it is not up to me to tell another woman that she should not. That is her decision and her decision alone (maybe the man's too).
People get very upset about protecting those that can't protect themselves.
I put a human at 5 weeks, at any # of weeks, in that category.....
I just don't understand how you can deny this being that you (or anyone else posting on this board) was at that stage.... no exceptions.
A person who has no business being a "mom," that's who. Women who want to be mothers are not the ones having abortions. Some people (a LOT of people actually) have other issues obviously. Do we want to force these kinds of people to be parents against their wills? Or to carry out a pregnancy?
I mean, people say, "they are irresponsible, they are irresponsible!" Well, there is no greater responsibility in the world than raising a child, IMO. So, these people do what is right for them. Perhaps it's not worth the health risks, perhaps they have some other issues.
I am certainly NOT falling for the old line that these people care about the babies though. That's bullshit as exhibited by their behaviors when it comes to their tax monies going to help these unwanted babies and children.
I agree with your premise, not your conclusion. There are obviously millions of people who should not have had kids, and I am not full of grief for the loss of babies that have been murdered by their own mothers out of convenience. Such sociopaths should have been sterilized during the procedure just in case.
However I don't agree that the people you claim are unwilling to part with tax money resent doing so because they have no compassion for the babies. They resent the waste of the money, because the lives of these children are wasted due to the incompetence of the state. I am very confident that many of these babies could be adopted, and would be adopted if not for state agencies that seem reluctant to allow a baby to be adopted by parents who might spank them, or teach them Christian beliefs.
You can kill this human above and be "okay" with it? Really?
That's not a choice that you are entitled to make for another woman. It is a very personal decision and should not be reliant upon government or other people's opinions on the matter.
It may have had more impact had they allowed the picture.
It's easier for you (and others) to put their heads in the sand...
Hey, let's not make this personal. This is not about me. I have not, nor would I, have an abortion but it is not up to me to tell another woman that she should not. That is her decision and her decision alone (maybe the man's too).
People get very upset about protecting those that can't protect themselves.
I put a human at 5 weeks, at any # of weeks, in that category.....
I just don't understand how you can deny this being that you (or anyone else posting on this board) was at that stage.... no exceptions.
I don't find your argument very logical or compelling. Sorry.
That might be the case for some but for many this is a strictly political issue. They pretend to care for unwanted unborn children of strangers when they obviously do not.
That might be the case for some but for many this is a strictly political issue. They pretend to care for unwanted unborn children of strangers when they obviously do not.
Judging from religious conservative I know, I would say the majority would rather adopt thousands of babies and establish orphanages that raised them as best as possible.
It's something I need to research, because before abortion was even considered, millions of babies went to church based orphanages. There are no statistics on those outcomes that I have ever seen though.
I remember stories about "Father Baker" who ran an orphanage in Buffalo NY, and I was threatened with being dropped off there for misbehaving, as were many other kids.
Regardless I don't believe you're right that most opponents of abortion wouldn't prefer to bear the cost of raising the children themselves because in the circles of people I know that isn't the case.
That's not a choice that you are entitled to make for another woman. It is a very personal decision and should not be reliant upon government or other people's opinions on the matter.
It may have had more impact had they allowed the picture.
It's easier for you (and others) to put their heads in the sand...
Hey, let's not make this personal. This is not about me. I have not, nor would I, have an abortion but it is not up to me to tell another woman that she should not. That is her decision and her decision alone (maybe the man's too).
People get very upset about protecting those that can't protect themselves.
I put a human at 5 weeks, at any # of weeks, in that category.....
I just don't understand how you can deny this being that you (or anyone else posting on this board) was at that stage.... no exceptions.
I don't find your argument very logical or compelling. Sorry.
Everyone has different mind sets and ways of thinking....
I really have not desire to force mine on anyone - only to share my perspective.
Some young girls might get an abortion because they really feel that a pregnancy at their age would interfere seriously with their lives. Do you consider them "sociopaths" too?