BookShaka
Gold Member
- May 22, 2018
- 2,387
- 465
Looks like those Liberals turds at the ACLU have finally admitted they are Leftest assholes.
They are against free speech when it is in conflict with their Leftest agenda of hate and destruction.
Typical for Left Wingers all over the world. Free speech or any or liberty is to be sacrificed for Socialism. or the vile demented Left view of "social justice".
Leaked Internal Memo Reveals the ACLU Is Wavering on Free Speech
Leaked Internal Memo Reveals the ACLU Is Wavering on Free Speech
"Our defense of speech may have a greater or lesser harmful impact on the equality and justice work to which we are also committed."
The American Civil Liberties Union will weigh its interest in protecting the First Amendment against its other commitments to social justice, racial equality, and women's rights, given the possibility that offensive speech might undermine ACLU goals.
"Our defense of speech may have a greater or lesser harmful impact on the equality and justice work to which we are also committed," wrote ACLU staffers in a confidential memo obtained by former board member Wendy Kaminer.
It's hard to see this as anything other than a cowardly retreat from a full-throated defense of the First Amendment. Moving forward, when deciding whether to take a free speech case, the organization will consider "factors such as the (present and historical) context of the proposed speech; the potential effect on marginalized communities; the extent to which the speech may assist in advancing the goals of white supremacists or others whose views are contrary to our values; and the structural and power inequalities in the community in which the speech will occur."
The founder of the ACLU's stated goal was the destruction of the USA. So this is not surprising.
For one there are multiple founders but I assume you're referring to Rodger Baldwin rather than that subversive commie Helen Keller.
Second, he didn't call for the destruction of the USA, you're simply lying and we know that's par for the course.
I believe this is the quote you or something you read sometime was referring to:
I am for socialism, disarmament, and, ultimately, for abolishing the state itself... I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class, and the sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal.
Sounds harsh, but he's not calling for the destruction of the United States and if you remove the Socialism and Communism references he sounds like plenty of the wingnuts on this board who have called for open rebellion and the dismantling of our government.
For the record, I disagree with Roger Baldwin on the quote above but thankfully there are more quotes which begin to paint a broader more complex person such as:
I regard the principle of conscription of life as a flat contradiction of all our cherished ideals of individual freedom, democratic liberty and Christian teaching.
Watch out that commie also likes democracy and Christianity. Time to attack the baby Jesus. Another quote:
So long as we have enough people in this country willing to fight for their rights, we'll be called a democracy.
And another...
would say that social work began in my mind in the Unitarian Church when I was ten or twelve years old, and I started to do things that I thought would help other people.
Another...
The rule of law in place of force, always basic to my thinking, now takes on a new relevance in a world where, if war is to go, only law can replace it.
However in the end the guy is dead and the ACLU has a history of defending the rights of others regardless of their own political ideologies like Rush Limbaugh and the KKK both of whom are staunchly right wing.
So, fuck off with your lyin' self.
I agree he didn’t explicitly state the destruction of the US is his goal, but wouldn’t a Communist America be a destroyed America? America’s values and the values of Communism do not at all match. If we could no longer call the US the “land of the free,” which would happen if it became ruled by Communism, would that not also signify the destruction of the roots of the country?