Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's what laws are for. Anyway kids have free speech rights while in school, and there's supreme court precedent to back them up. In either case a kid can be a citizen and do tell me where in the constitution it limits rights to minors. Also that T-Shirt did not promote violence.People are free to express hate and promote violence anywhere on the internet or at the dinner table. CHILDREN cannot do that at school. They cannot say it; write it; or wear it. It is not about the LAW - it is about maintaining rules and standards of conduct in the classroom.
God forbid people have views you don't like, you need to remain a control freak.It is despicable that they would want to prevent educators from TEACHING acceptable behavior. I'm hopeful they will lose.
They fight against intelligent design and abstinence education not because they infringe on rights, but because they are part of an order they believe needs to be abolished.
It was founded by communists and though many members and lawyers would say they aren't communist today that foundation influences the way they look at things.
They are militant privacy advocates and anti-government to the point of wanting to take away valid tools from law enforcement.
This is why they helped Rush Limbaugh, not because they support his speech, but because their causes temporarily aligned when the Florida prosecutor's office seized his medical records unjustly.
That is not to say that the government is lily white when it comes to privacy, but to say that monitoring phone calls of suspected terrorists leads to a police state is ludicrous and scare-mongering.
The ACLU attacks the traditional foundation of the family in society. This is why they fight against parental notification of abortions,
In communist nations, the state is the highest authority and all needs and actions must be made in connection with what is best for the state. That is why you can talk about purges and gulags and communists don't flinch. Communism requires them.
Their attacks on Christianity aren't designed to eradicate Christianity, per se. They are designed to establish a social order (or more appropriately destroy the existing order) and customs that advance their ideas and Christianity isn't a part of it. In short, they aren't anti-Christian in intent, they are anti-Christian in effect.
Wow, are you two serious with the going back & forth on eachother or is this an inside joke? Especially in this topic?
How about we say the ACLU is just scattered all over the place.
he believes in censorship out of one side of his mouth and supports the aclu out of the other,, see the irony there?
Did you get taken over by PI?
Neg repping someone is not censorship, it does not inhibit your ability to speak on this site in any way.
Now stop with the bull crap.
Under the First Amendment, there are no illegal ideas. Those who commit illegal acts can be punished for wrongful conduct, but the expression of even offensive ideas is protected by our Constitution," the ACLU said in a statement.
You really are a moron. No offense.
Dear God, so much stupid.
They fight against intelligent design and abstinence education not because they infringe on rights, but because they are part of an order they believe needs to be abolished.
Intelligent Design is not science and it's a religion, so yeah it's unconstitutional to teach it in schools. Abstinence education is a bad joke that doesn't work.
It was founded by communists and though many members and lawyers would say they aren't communist today that foundation influences the way they look at things.
Unprovable speculation, wow color me impressed.
Valid according to whom?
Why is helping Limbaugh in this case a bad thing?
It may violate the 4th so it should be challenged.
No it's because kids are citizens and they are entitled to rights as well. Hell roe v wade was an extension on the 9th amendment right to privacy.
In communist nations, the state is the highest authority and all needs and actions must be made in connection with what is best for the state. That is why you can talk about purges and gulags and communists don't flinch. Communism requires them.
So let me get this straight, they're very anti-state yet they're also communists which requires the state to be the ultimate authority? How the fuck can that be possible? Oh wait I forgot they're all part of a great big socialist conspiracy.
Their attacks on Christianity aren't designed to eradicate Christianity, per se. They are designed to establish a social order (or more appropriately destroy the existing order) and customs that advance their ideas and Christianity isn't a part of it. In short, they aren't anti-Christian in intent, they are anti-Christian in effect.
Dear God, so much stupid.
They fight against intelligent design and abstinence education not because they infringe on rights, but because they are part of an order they believe needs to be abolished.
Intelligent Design is not science and it's a religion, so yeah it's unconstitutional to teach it in schools. Abstinence education is a bad joke that doesn't work.
It was founded by communists and though many members and lawyers would say they aren't communist today that foundation influences the way they look at things.
Unprovable speculation, wow color me impressed.
Valid according to whom?
Why is helping Limbaugh in this case a bad thing?
It may violate the 4th so it should be challenged.
No it's because kids are citizens and they are entitled to rights as well. Hell roe v wade was an extension on the 9th amendment right to privacy.
In communist nations, the state is the highest authority and all needs and actions must be made in connection with what is best for the state. That is why you can talk about purges and gulags and communists don't flinch. Communism requires them.
So let me get this straight, they're very anti-state yet they're also communists which requires the state to be the ultimate authority? How the fuck can that be possible? Oh wait I forgot they're all part of a great big socialist conspiracy.
Their attacks on Christianity aren't designed to eradicate Christianity, per se. They are designed to establish a social order (or more appropriately destroy the existing order) and customs that advance their ideas and Christianity isn't a part of it. In short, they aren't anti-Christian in intent, they are anti-Christian in effect.
The only reason I'm even bothering with you is because of your well established obsession with getting in the last word. I wore down Liarbilly and I can do the same to you.
Go.
you are a liar, you said ACLU did not defend NAMBLA! That's the last word..
You really are a moron. No offense.
Manifold calling somebody a moron is a net positive. Thanks!
The only reason I'm even bothering with you is because of your well established obsession with getting in the last word. I wore down Liarbilly and I can do the same to you.
Go.
you are a liar, you said ACLU did not defend NAMBLA! That's the last word..
I never even mentioned NAMBLA
Massive FAIL!
you are a liar, you said ACLU did not defend NAMBLA! That's the last word..
I never even mentioned NAMBLA
Massive FAIL!
I did ManTwat and you said if I believed that I was stupid. You lie. ACLU did defend NAMBLA
Did they take their case pro-bono or did NAMBLA pay? If they expended one dime defending these scumbags, then they supported them. MASSIVE FAIL MANI.
I never even mentioned NAMBLA
Massive FAIL!
I did ManTwat and you said if I believed that I was stupid. You lie. ACLU did defend NAMBLA
In the post I replied to you said the ACLU SUPPORTS NAMBLA. And if you believe that then indeed you are a stupid twat. I never said they didn't defend NAMBLA's 1st Amendment rights.
So in regards to your poorly conceived attempt at wordplay...
Seriously MASSIVE FAIL!
Did they take their case pro-bono or did NAMBLA pay? If they expended one dime defending these scumbags, then they supported them. MASSIVE FAIL MANI.
Irrelevant.
They support and defend the 1st Amendment rights of all Americans, including scumbags like NAMBLA. But to suggest they "support" NAMBLA implies that they support their cause.
To pretend otherwise makes you look like an ignorant douche. No offense.
